국내 중소건설업체의 효율성 평가에 관한 연구
A Study on the Evaluation of Efficiency in the Korean Small and Medium sized Construction Firms
0
조회
0
다운로드
3
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
In this study, we evaluate the efficiency of Construction Industry using Data Envelopment Analysis(DEA). Since the Construction Industry has been traditionally operated through competition, it is important to measure the efficiency. In this paper, we empirically analyze the Efficiency of the 50 Korean Construction Industry. In detail, we used the scale of efficiency in order that efficiency cannot be affected by the total technical efficiency of each company and the scale of DMU by applying CCR or BBC model. Also, we analyzed the changes of measurement DEA model score. we adopted the basic DEA, RTS Region and MPSS(Most Productive Scale Size)method which are combined with efficiency measurement model in order to analyze the operational status. Furthermore, by complementing the shortfalls of the scale efficiency value of the DEA Model, RTS Region Model can be recommended to be appropriate in the evaluation of ideal input/output Quantity. In particular, input variables are total assets, construction capacity, the technical staff and output variables are sales volume, operating income. The result of RTS Region and MPSS shows that 9 DMUs of the efficiency frontier in the Construction Industry are analyzed to be relatively efficient DMUs, and 41 DMUs are analyzed to be inefficient DMUs, and finally inefficient DMUs are separated with Region 1 and Region 6.
Abstract
In this study, we evaluate the efficiency of Construction Industry using Data Envelopment Analysis(DEA). Since the Construction Industry has been traditionally operated through competition, it is important to measure the efficiency. In this paper, we empirically analyze the Efficiency of the 50 Korean Construction Industry. In detail, we used the scale of efficiency in order that efficiency cannot be affected by the total technical efficiency of each company and the scale of DMU by applying CCR or BBC model. Also, we analyzed the changes of measurement DEA model score. we adopted the basic DEA, RTS Region and MPSS(Most Productive Scale Size)method which are combined with efficiency measurement model in order to analyze the operational status. Furthermore, by complementing the shortfalls of the scale efficiency value of the DEA Model, RTS Region Model can be recommended to be appropriate in the evaluation of ideal input/output Quantity. In particular, input variables are total assets, construction capacity, the technical staff and output variables are sales volume, operating income. The result of RTS Region and MPSS shows that 9 DMUs of the efficiency frontier in the Construction Industry are analyzed to be relatively efficient DMUs, and 41 DMUs are analyzed to be inefficient DMUs, and finally inefficient DMUs are separated with Region 1 and Region 6.
참고문헌 (22)
- 김기현, "건설기업에 적합한 성과측정시스템 대안 평가", 석사, pp.2004
- 김대현, "균형성과표를 이용한 건 설사업 성과측정 구축방향에 관한 연구", 한국건설관리학회 추계학술대회 논문집, pp.494~499 (2004)
- 김우섭, "건축공사 사후평가를 위한 평가항목 선정에 관한 연구", 대한건축학회논문집 구조계, 19(2), pp.171~178 (2003), 대한건축학회
- 박찬식, "건설엔지니어링 기업의 경영성과측정모형- H사의 사례를 중심으로 -", 한국건설관리학회 논문집, 5(2), pp.202~210 (2004), 한국건설관리학회
- 신용일, "건설사업 성과측정기법 비교분석 및 성과측정 Best Practice에 관한 연구", 대한건축학회논문집 구조계, 20(3), pp.109~116 (2004), 대한건축학회
- 유일한, "비교가능한 건설산업의 성과측정 Framework", 한국건설관리학회 논문집, 5(5), pp.172~182 (2004), 한국건설관리학회
- 이형록, "DEA기법을 이용한 시공능력평가 순위와 건설업체 운영효율성의 상관관계 분석", 대한건축학회논문집 구조계, 26(05), pp.125~132 (2010), 대한건축학회
- 정순오, "건설 프로젝트 Life Cycle Process의 효율성 평가", 박사, pp.2005
- 정순오, "건설생산의 Life Cycle을 고려한 효율성 측정방안", 한국건설관리학회 학술대회발표논문, pp.608~611 (2004)
- 정원조, "건설기업의 규모에 다른 성과지표 가중치 비교분석", 석사, pp.2004
- 정인환, "아파트 공사의 공법별 노동 생산성 분석", 대한건축학회 논문집 구조계, 11(6), pp.153~159 (1995)
- 한국건설산업연구원, "건설산업의 당면 현안과 정책대응 방안", 한국건설산업연구원, 1~210 (2010)
- Banker,D.R, "Some models for estimating technical and scale inefficiencies in data envelopment analysis", Management Science, 30(9), pp.1078~1092 (1984)
- Charnes,A, "Measuring the Efficiency of Decision Marking Units", European Journal of Operational Research, (2), pp.429~444 (1978)
- Färe,R, "Production Frontiers" (1994), Cambridge University Press
- Farrell,M,J., "The Measurement of Productive Efficiency", Journal of Royal of Statistical Society, 120(3), pp.253~290 (1957)
- Kagioglou,M, "Performance Management in Construction:A Conceptual Framework", Construction Management and Economics, 19(1), pp.85~94 (2001)
- Russell,J.S, "Continuous Assessment of Project Performance", Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 123(1), pp.64~71 (1997)
- Seiford,L.M, "An Investigation of Returns to Scale in Data Envelopment Analysis", Omega-International Journal of Management Science, 27(1), pp.1~11 (1999)
- Ward,S.C, "Objectives and performance in Construction projects", Construction Management and Economics, 9(4), pp.343~353 (1991)
- Zhu,J, "Setting scale efficient targets in DEAvia returns to scale estimation method", Journalof Operational Research Society, 51(3), pp.376~378 (2000)
- Zhu,J, "Quantitative Models for Performance Evaluation and Benchmarking" (2003), Kluwer Academic Publishers