본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

인공발목관절의 임상시험 가이드라인 개발을 위한 문헌적 고찰

Review of Literatures for Development of Clinical Trial Guideline for Total Ankle Arthroplasty

2

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

Purpose: The purpose of this study is to develop guidelines for clinical trial of the total ankle replacement system for premarket approval. Materials and Methods: We selected and analyzed nine peer-reviewed articles whose quality had been proven in a previous phase. Two investigators extracted parameters for guideline criteria, including number of cases, patient age, follow-up period, failure rate, radiographic osteolysis rate, residual pain rate, and percentage of satisfaction. In addition, the inclusion and exclusion criteria were analyzed and developed. Results: Eight level IV studies and one level II study were included. The average number of cases was 159 cases and the mean patient age was 63.5 years. The mean follow-up period was 4.2 years, ranging from two to nine. The average failure rate of total ankle replacement in mid- to long-term follow-up was approximately 13% (2%∼32.3%). The rate of osteolysis was approximately 18%. Residual pain was common (21.4%∼46%), but overall patient satisfaction was approximately 85.6% (67.5%∼97%). Conclusion: The results could be used as criteria for designing the clinical studies, such as number of cases, patient age (over 60 years), and follow-up period (minimum two years). The clinical scoring system and 36-item short form health survey (SF-36) was the most commonly used method for clinical evaluation for total ankle arthroplasty. In addition, the overall results, including failure rate, osteolysis rate, and patient satisfaction, could be used as a parameter of guidelines for premarket approval.

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study is to develop guidelines for clinical trial of the total ankle replacement system for premarket approval. Materials and Methods: We selected and analyzed nine peer-reviewed articles whose quality had been proven in a previous phase. Two investigators extracted parameters for guideline criteria, including number of cases, patient age, follow-up period, failure rate, radiographic osteolysis rate, residual pain rate, and percentage of satisfaction. In addition, the inclusion and exclusion criteria were analyzed and developed. Results: Eight level IV studies and one level II study were included. The average number of cases was 159 cases and the mean patient age was 63.5 years. The mean follow-up period was 4.2 years, ranging from two to nine. The average failure rate of total ankle replacement in mid- to long-term follow-up was approximately 13% (2%∼32.3%). The rate of osteolysis was approximately 18%. Residual pain was common (21.4%∼46%), but overall patient satisfaction was approximately 85.6% (67.5%∼97%). Conclusion: The results could be used as criteria for designing the clinical studies, such as number of cases, patient age (over 60 years), and follow-up period (minimum two years). The clinical scoring system and 36-item short form health survey (SF-36) was the most commonly used method for clinical evaluation for total ankle arthroplasty. In addition, the overall results, including failure rate, osteolysis rate, and patient satisfaction, could be used as a parameter of guidelines for premarket approval.

참고문헌 (23)

  1. Lord G, "Total ankle prosthesis. Technic and 1st results. Apropos of 12 cases", Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot, 59, pp.139~151 (1973)
  2. Gougoulias NE, "History and evolution in total ankle arthroplasty", Br Med Bull, 89, pp.111~151 (2009)
  3. Cracchiolo A, "Design features of current total ankle replacements : implants and instrumentation", J Am Acad Orthop Surg, 16, pp.530~540 (2008)
  4. Anderson T, "Uncemented STAR total ankle prostheses. Three to eight-year follow-up of fifty-one consecutive ankles", J Bone Joint Surg Am, 85, pp.1321~1329 (2003)
  5. Bonnin M, "Midterm results of the Salto Total Ankle Prosthesis", Clin Orthop Relat Res, (424), pp.6~18 (2004)
  6. Hurowitz EJ, "Outcome analysis of agility total ankle replacement with prior adjunctive procedures : two to six year followup", Foot Ankle Int, 28, pp.308~312 (2007)
  7. Knecht SI, "The Agility total ankle arthroplasty. Seven to sixteen-year follow-up", J Bone Joint Surg Am, 86, pp.1161~1171 (2004)
  8. Saltzman CL, "Prospective controlled trial of STAR total ankle replacement versus ankle fusion : initial results", Foot Ankle Int, 30, pp.579~596 (2009)
  9. Schweitzer KM, "Early prospective clinical results of a modern fixed-bearing total ankle arthroplasty", J Bone Joint Surg Am, 95, pp.1002~1011 (2013)
  10. Valderrabano V, "Scandinavian total ankle replacement: a 3.7-year average followup of 65 patients", Clin Orthop Relat Res, (424), pp.47~56 (2004)
  11. Valderrabano V, "Sports and recreation activity of ankle arthritis patients before and after total ankle replacement", Am J Sports Med, 34, pp.993~999 (2006)
  12. Wood PL, "Total ankle replacement : mediumterm results in 200 Scandinavian total ankle replacements", J Bone Joint Surg Br, 90, pp.605~609 (2008)
  13. Takakura Y, "Low tibial osteotomy for osteoarthritis of the ankle. Results of a new operation in 18 patients", J Bone Joint Surg Br, 77, pp.50~54 (1995)
  14. Kellgren JH, "Radiological assessment of osteo-arthrosis", Ann Rheum Dis, 16, pp.494~502 (1957)
  15. Kofoed H, "Cylindrical cemented ankle arthroplasty : a prospective series with long-term follow-up", Foot Ankle Int, 16, pp.474~479 (1995)
  16. Kitaoka HB, "Clinical rating systems for the ankle-hindfoot, midfoot, hallux, and lesser toes", Foot Ankle Int, 15, pp.349~353 (1994)
  17. Buechel FF, "New Jersey low contact stress total ankle replacement : biomechanical rationale and review of 23 cementless cases", Foot Ankle, 8, pp.279~290 (1988)
  18. Domsic RT, "Ankle osteoarthritis scale", Foot Ankle Int, 19, pp.466~471 (1998)
  19. Martin RL, "A survey of self-reported outcome instruments for the foot and ankle", J Orthop Sports Phys Ther, 37, pp.72~84 (2007)
  20. Ware JE Jr, "The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection", Med Care, 30, pp.473~483 (1992)
  21. Hintermann B, "The HINTEGRA ankle: rationale and short-term results of 122 consecutive ankles", Clin Orthop Relat Res, (424), pp.57~68 (2004)
  22. Roos EM, "Validation of the foot and ankle outcome score for ankle ligament reconstruction", Foot Ankle Int, 22, pp.788~794 (2001)
  23. Lee KM, "Transcultural adaptation and testing psychometric properties of the Korean version of the Foot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS)", Clin Rheumatol, 32, pp.1443~1450 (2013)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (15건)