본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

예비 생물교사의 SSI(Socio-Scientific Issues) 글쓰기에 나타난 논증 수준과 구조 변화 분석

Analysis on Changes of Argumentation Level and Structure Presented in Pre-Service Biology Teachers’ SSI(Socio-Scientific Issues) Writing

2

조회

0

다운로드

5

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류교육학

초록

The purpose of this study was to investigate the changes of argumentation structures shown in SSI writing by pre-service biology teachers. Also it was to analyze the level of argumentation. To this end, we developed SSI writing activities that incorporated definitions and characteristics of SSI, the relationship between SSI education and scientific knowledge, SSI education and writing, the meaning and necessity for essay writing, and SSI reasoning and applied it to pre-service biology teachers. Over three writing tasks, the level of argumentation by the pre-service biology teachers gradually increased. In the result of the analysis, pre-service biology teachers clearly presented the purpose of the writing and used rebuttal in their argumentation writing. The application of the SSI writing program was shown to be effective in improving the SSI writing argumentation structure of them. The result of this study suggest that need for SSI writing education in the teacher training curriculum.

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to investigate the changes of argumentation structures shown in SSI writing by pre-service biology teachers. Also it was to analyze the level of argumentation. To this end, we developed SSI writing activities that incorporated definitions and characteristics of SSI, the relationship between SSI education and scientific knowledge, SSI education and writing, the meaning and necessity for essay writing, and SSI reasoning and applied it to pre-service biology teachers. Over three writing tasks, the level of argumentation by the pre-service biology teachers gradually increased. In the result of the analysis, pre-service biology teachers clearly presented the purpose of the writing and used rebuttal in their argumentation writing. The application of the SSI writing program was shown to be effective in improving the SSI writing argumentation structure of them. The result of this study suggest that need for SSI writing education in the teacher training curriculum.

참고문헌 (34)

  1. Balgopal, M., "Writing-to-learn, writingto-communicate, & science literacy", The American Biology Teacher, 75(3), pp.170~175 (2013)
  2. Christenson, N., "A framework for teachers’ assessment of socio-scientific argumentation:An example using the GMO issue", Journal of Biological Education, 49(2), pp.204~212 (2015)
  3. Clark, D. B., "Assessing dialogic argumentation in online environments to relate structure, grounds and conceptual equality", Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45(3), pp.293~321 (2008)
  4. Driver, R., "Establishing the norms of scientific argumentation in classroom", Science Education, 84(3), pp.287~312 (2000)
  5. Evagorou, M., "Preparing preservice science teachers to teach socio-scientific (SSI)argumentation", Science Teacher, 69, pp.39~48 (2014)
  6. Flower, S. R., "Moral sensitivity in the context of socio-scientific issues in high school science students", International Journal of Science Education, 31(2), pp.279~296 (2009)
  7. Gray, D. S., "Socio-scientific issues in science education : Implication for the professional development of teachers", Cambridge Journal of Education, 36(2), pp.171~192 (2006)
  8. Gray, D. S., "Socio-scientific issues in science education : Implications for the professional development of teachers", Cambridge Journal of Education, 36(2), pp.171~192 (2006)
  9. Gunel, M., "Writing for different audiences : Effects on high-school students'conceptual understanding of biology", Learning and Instruction, 19(4), pp.354~367 (2009)
  10. 강경희, "예비 생물교사의 SSI(Socio-Scientific Issue) 관련 글쓰기에 나타난 논증구조 분석", 생물교육, 46(1), pp.55~62 (2018), 한국생물교육학회[DOI]
  11. 김선영, "예비 생물교사들의 생명윤리 논쟁거리에 대한 논증 활동의 효과", 생물교육, 43(1), pp.27~36 (2015), 한국생물교육학회[DOI]
  12. 권수희, "SSI-PCK 향상을 위한 교사교육이예비 과학교사들의 SSI 교육에 대한 이해 및 교수 효능감에 미치는 영향", 학습자중심교과교육연구, 18(21), pp.211~236 (2018), 학습자중심교과교육학회[DOI]
  13. 이봉우, "탐구 토론에서 예비과학교사들의 논증 분석", 한국과학교육학회지, 30(6), pp.739~751 (2010), 한국과학교육학회
  14. Lee, H., "Conceptualization of a SSI-PCK framework for teaching socio-scientific issues", Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 35(4), pp.539~550 (2016)
  15. Lee, H., "Korean science teachers’ perceptions of the introduction of socioscientific issues into the science curriculum", Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 6(2), pp.97~117 (2010)
  16. Lee, H., "Developing character and values for global citizens:Analysis of preservice science teachers' moral reasoning on socio-scientific issues", International Journal of Science Education, 34(6), pp.925~953 (2012)
  17. 이현주, "과학과 관련된 사회․윤리적 문제(SSI) 교육 프로그램이 예비 과학 교사들의 SSI 교수에 대한 인식에 미치는 영향", 교과교육학연구, 15(4), pp.913~932 (2011), 교과교육연구소[DOI]
  18. Lee, H., "Science teachers’ inspiration for teaching socio-scientific issues: Disconnection with reform efforts", International Journal of Science Education, 31(7), pp.931~960 (2009)
  19. 이선경, "소집단 토론에서 발생하는 학생들의 상호작용적 논증 유형 및 특징", 대한화학회지, 50(1), pp.79~88 (2006), 대한화학회
  20. Loughran, J., "In search of pedagogical content knowledge in science: Developing ways of articulating and documenting professional practice", Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(4), pp.370~391 (2004)
  21. 2015 Revised Science Curriculum, "Ministry of Education", Ministry of Education, Science and Technology, ~ (2015)
  22. O’Donnell, A. M., "Cognitive Perspectives on Peer Learning" (1998), Erlbaum
  23. Osborne, J. F., "Enhancing the quality of argument in school science", Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(10), pp.994~1020 (2004)
  24. 백성혜, "중학교 1학년 상태변화 실험수행과정에서 나타난 예비과학교사의 논증구조 및 이에 영향을 미치는 요인과 예비교사교육에 대한 인식 분석", 한국과학교육학회지, 34(3), pp.197~206 (2014), 한국과학교육학회[DOI]
  25. 박영신, "교실에서의 실질적 과학 탐구를 위한 과학적 논증 기회에 대한 이론적 고찰", 한국지구과학회지, 27(4), pp.401~415 (2006), 한국지구과학회
  26. Ritchie, S., "Writing stories to enhance scientific literacy", International Journal of Science Education, 33(5), pp.685~707 (2011)
  27. Sadler, T. D., "Socioscience and ethics in science classroom:Teacher perspectives and strategies", Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 43(4), pp.353~376 (2006)
  28. Simon, S., "Learning to teach argumentation: Research and development in the science classroom", International Journal of Science Education, 28(2), pp.235~260 (2006)
  29. 위수민, "지구과학 관련 사회적 문제(socio-scientific issue)와 관련된 논증적 글쓰기를 통해 알아본 예비교사들의 논증구조 발달 분석", 대한지구과학교육학회지, 7(1), pp.11~23 (2014), 대한지구과학교육학회
  30. Wellington, J., "Language and Literacy in Science Education" (2001), Open University Press
  31. 양일호, "과학적 논증과정 평가를 위한 루브릭 개발", 한국과학교육학회지, 29(2), pp.203~220 (2009), 한국과학교육학회
  32. 윤선미, "소집단의 논변활동을 위한 과학 탐구 과제의 개발과 적용", 한국과학교육학회지, 31(5), pp.694~708 (2011), 한국과학교육학회
  33. Zeidler, D. L., "The role of moral reasoning in argumentation: Conscience, character, and care", Argumentation in Science Education, pp.201~216 (2007)
  34. Zeidler, D. L., "Beyond STS : A research-based framework for socio-scientific issues education", Science Education, 89(3), pp.357~377 (2005)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (13건)