과학 관련 사회적 문제(SSI) 상황에서 반박자료와 감정이입상황에 따른 초등학생의 의사결정 변화
Elementary School Students’ Decision-Making Change through Refutation Materials and Empathic Situation on Socio-Scientific Issue
0
조회
0
다운로드
10
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This study is to investigate an argumentation level for elementary school students after analysing an argumentation structure about a socio scientific issue(SSI), and inquire a change of the decision-making according to the refutation materials and empathic situation. This data was collected from the semi-structured interview with the 14 students, grade 6th. For this, the first stage is to present the reading materials about the SSI to the students, let them decision-making and make them argue pro and con about the SSI during the interview. After that, facing with the refutation materials against the existing contention and the empathic situation, the change of the decision-making of the students was conducted. After the research, the level of the argumentation of the students was low, and the students who didn’t have the background knowledge about the theme made the decisions according to the values, emotions or intuitions of their own. And the decision-making of the students changed more when presented with the refutation materials and the empathic situation, they were difficult to make the decision because of new information and various stances. Besides, they lacked in the ability that recognize the situation related with their own life, just used the fragmentary knowledge associated with value of life respect. Through these result, it is necessary to produce the refutation materials and empathic materials about the SSI to the students for improving the level of argumentation.
Abstract
This study is to investigate an argumentation level for elementary school students after analysing an argumentation structure about a socio scientific issue(SSI), and inquire a change of the decision-making according to the refutation materials and empathic situation. This data was collected from the semi-structured interview with the 14 students, grade 6th. For this, the first stage is to present the reading materials about the SSI to the students, let them decision-making and make them argue pro and con about the SSI during the interview. After that, facing with the refutation materials against the existing contention and the empathic situation, the change of the decision-making of the students was conducted. After the research, the level of the argumentation of the students was low, and the students who didn’t have the background knowledge about the theme made the decisions according to the values, emotions or intuitions of their own. And the decision-making of the students changed more when presented with the refutation materials and the empathic situation, they were difficult to make the decision because of new information and various stances. Besides, they lacked in the ability that recognize the situation related with their own life, just used the fragmentary knowledge associated with value of life respect. Through these result, it is necessary to produce the refutation materials and empathic materials about the SSI to the students for improving the level of argumentation.
참고문헌 (32)
- Bae, J. I, "Analysis of the types of claims and argumentations in science debate classes of fifth graders", Science education proceedings, 20(1), pp.63~83 (2014)
- Bell, R. L, "Understandings of the nature of science and decision-making on science and technology based issues", Science Education, 87(3), pp.352~377 (2003)
- 장현숙, "College Students’ Decision-Making Tendencies in the Context of Socioscientific Issues (SSI)", 한국과학교육학회지, 30(7), pp.887~900 (2010), 한국과학교육학회
- Driver, R, "Establishing the norms of scientific argumentation in classrooms", Science Education, 84(3), pp.287~312 (2000)
- Erduran, S, "Argumentation in Science Education: Perspectives from classroom-based research", pp.47~69 (2008)
- Fleming, R, "Adolescent reasoning in socioscientific issues. Part Ⅰ : Social cognition", Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 23, pp.677~687 (1986)
- 장해리, "과학과 관련된 사회∙윤리적 문제에 대한 의사결정 시 수행하는 비형식적 추론 분석", 한국과학교육학회지, 29(2), pp.253~266 (2009), 한국과학교육학회
- 장지영, "과학과 관련된 사회∙윤리적 문제(SSI)의 맥락에 따른 중학생들의 인성적 태도와 가치관 분석", 한국과학교육학회지, 32(7), pp.1124~1138 (2012), 한국과학교육학회
- Jeong, E. Y, "The application of biology instructional models for value inquiry education", Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 21(1), pp.160~173 (2001)
- 조헌국, "과학 관련 사회적 쟁점을 다룬 국내 학술 논문에 대한 문헌 연구 - 의사결정을 중심으로 -", 교과교육학연구, 18(1), pp.191~213 (2014), 교과교육연구소
- 주인애, "생명공학과 관련된 사회적 쟁점에 대한 중학생들의 가치판단 및 의사결정 과정에서 드러난 가치 적용 방식 유형", 한국과학교육학회지, 33(1), pp.79~93 (2013), 한국과학교육학회
- Kim, H. B, "Secondary students’attitudes toward science-technology related issues in korea", Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 16(4), pp.461~469 (1996)
- 김희경, "학생의 논변활동을 강조한 개방적 과학탐구활동 모형의 탐색", 한국과학교육학회지, 24(6), pp.1216~1234 (2004), 한국과학교육학회
- Kolsto, S. D, "Scientific literacy for citizenship : Tools for dealing with the science dimension of controversial socioscientific issues", Science Education, 85(3), pp.291~310 (2001)
- 곽경화, "과학적 논의과정 활동을 통한 학생들의 논의과정 변화 및 논의상황에 따른 논의과정 특성", 한국과학교육학회지, 29(4), pp.400~413 (2009), 한국과학교육학회
- 이현주, "과학과 관련된 사회적·윤리적 문제에 대한 예비 과학교사들의 의사결정유형", 교과교육학연구, 12(2), pp.377~396 (2008), 교과교육연구소
- 이지영, "갈등 상황에서 구성된 중학생들의 소집단 논변활동 유형", 생물교육, 39(2), pp.235~247 (2011), 한국생물교육학회
- 임미연, "생명공학 SSI 수업에서 나타난 영재 중학생들의 의사결정 변화의 유형 분석", 교과교육학연구, 17(4), pp.1501~1522 (2013), 교과교육연구소
- Osborne, J. E, "Enhancing the quality of argumentation in school science", Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(10), pp.994~1020 (2004)
- Park, Y. B, "The effects of decision-making activities about bioethical issues on students` rational decision-making ability in high school biology", Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 22(1), pp.54~63 (2002)
- 박영신, "교실에서의 실질적 과학 탐구를 위한 과학적 논증 기회에 대한 이론적 고찰", 한국지구과학회지, 27(4), pp.401~415 (2006), 한국지구과학회
- Quinn, V, "Critical thinking in young minds" (1997), David Fulton
- Sadler, T. D, "Moral and ethical dimensions of socioscientific decision-making as integral components of scientific literacy", The Science Educator, 13, pp.39~48 (2004)
- Sadler, T. D, "The morality of socioscientific issues : Construal and resolution of genetic engineering dilemmas", Science Education, 88, pp.4~27 (2004)
- Sadler, T. D, "Patterns of informal reasoning in the context of socioscientific decision making", Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42(1), pp.112~138 (2005)
- Sadler, T. D, "Socioscience and ethics in science classrooms: teacher perspecctives and strategies", Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 43(4), pp.353~376 (2006)
- Sadler, T. D, "Socioscientific argumentation: The effects of content knowledge and morality", International Journal of Science Education, 28(12), pp.1463~1488 (2006)
- Toulmin, S, "The uses of argument" (1958), Cambridge University Press
- Yun, M. H, "The analysis of decision-making process based on the nature of science : Focused on socio-scientific issues", Journal of science education, 34, pp.85~98 (2007)
- Zeidler, D. L, "Tangled up in views: Beliefs in the nature of science and responses to socioscientific dilemmas", Science Education, 86(3), pp.343~367 (2002)
- Zeidler, D. L, "Beyond STS : A research-based framework for socioscientific issues education", Science Education, 89(3), pp.357~377 (2005)
- Zohar, A, "Fostering student's knowledge and argumentation skills through dilemmas in human genetics", Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(1), pp.35~62 (2002)