본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

수업형태와 수업환경에 대한 과학영재와 일반 학생들의 선호도 비교

The Comparison on Preferences about Class Forms and Class Environments between the Science Gifted Students and Normal Students

2

조회

0

다운로드

5

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

The purpose of this study was to be a help with designing science curriculum and developing science programs for the science gifted students by comparing their preferences about science class forms and class environments between science gifted students and normal students. For this study, 2 classes of science gifted students and 5 classes of normal students in 4th, 5th grade joined in this survey and their preferences about science class forms and class environments were checked using questionnaire. As a result, the following findings were obtained. First, in the area of class form, from comparing their preferences about teaching content domain, science gifted students showed meaningful higher preferences in all factors such as clarification, structuralization, thinking of high level and diversification. In comparing their preferences about teaching process domain, science gifted students also showed meaningful higher preferences in all factors such as diversification and self directed learning. Second, in the area of class environment, from comparing their preferences about classroom domain, science gifted students showed meaningful higher preferences in all factors such as teacher’s support and rule and organization. In comparing their preferences about mentality domain, science gifted students also showed meaningful higher preferences in all factors such as influence of friends and parents. Third, in science gifted students, from comparing their preferences by gender about science class forms and class environments, female students showed meaningful higher preferences in factors of clarification. And in other factors females showed similar preference tendency with male students. In normal students’ comparing, female students showed meaningful higher preferences in factors of teacher’s support. And male students showed meaningful higher preferences in factors of high level thinking and influence of friend and influence of parents.

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to be a help with designing science curriculum and developing science programs for the science gifted students by comparing their preferences about science class forms and class environments between science gifted students and normal students. For this study, 2 classes of science gifted students and 5 classes of normal students in 4th, 5th grade joined in this survey and their preferences about science class forms and class environments were checked using questionnaire. As a result, the following findings were obtained. First, in the area of class form, from comparing their preferences about teaching content domain, science gifted students showed meaningful higher preferences in all factors such as clarification, structuralization, thinking of high level and diversification. In comparing their preferences about teaching process domain, science gifted students also showed meaningful higher preferences in all factors such as diversification and self directed learning. Second, in the area of class environment, from comparing their preferences about classroom domain, science gifted students showed meaningful higher preferences in all factors such as teacher’s support and rule and organization. In comparing their preferences about mentality domain, science gifted students also showed meaningful higher preferences in all factors such as influence of friends and parents. Third, in science gifted students, from comparing their preferences by gender about science class forms and class environments, female students showed meaningful higher preferences in factors of clarification. And in other factors females showed similar preference tendency with male students. In normal students’ comparing, female students showed meaningful higher preferences in factors of teacher’s support. And male students showed meaningful higher preferences in factors of high level thinking and influence of friend and influence of parents.

참고문헌 (14)

  1. Cho Yoon-jin, "An analysis of trend in research related to the gifted and talented education in Korea: 2007-2011", 석사, pp.2012
  2. Dong Hyo-kwan, "The effect of teaching program based on the characteristics of the gifted in science on conceptual change of genetics and creativity", 박사, pp.2002
  3. 동효관, "과학영재가 선호하는 수업형태와 수업환경 조사를 통한 수업 전략의 개발", 생물교육, 31(1), pp.16~23 (2003), 한국생물교육학회
  4. Heller, K. A, "Identifying and Nurturing the Gifted: An International Perspective", pp.33~38 (1986), Huber
  5. Kaplan, S, "Providing programs for the gifted and talented: A handbook" (1974), Office of the Ventura County Superintendent of Schools
  6. Kim Sang-mi, "The Analysis of operation condition and program about elementary math gifted class", 석사, pp.2014
  7. Lee Dae-won, "Math teaching method and classroom environment preferred by the gifted", 석사, pp.2011
  8. 이대원, "고등학교 영재 학생들이 선호하는 수학 수업형태와 수업환경", 영재교육연구, 22(1), pp.23~37 (2012), 한국영재학회[DOI]
  9. "National Digital Library"[URL]
  10. Redding, R. E, "Learning preferences and skill patterns among underachieving gifted adolescents", Gifted Child Quarterly, 34(1), pp.72~75 (1990)
  11. Renzulli, J. S, "What makes Giftedness? Reexamining a definition", Phi Delta Kappa, 60(3), pp.180~184 (1978)
  12. Shin Young-jun, "Development of girl friendly science teaching strategy based on the analysis of gender gaps in science learning background in secondary science classes", 박사, pp.2000
  13. Tremaine, R. V, "Syntax and Piagetation operational thought" (1975), Georgetown University Press
  14. Whitmore, J. R, "Understanding a lack of motivation to excel", Gifted Child Quarterly, 30(1), pp.66~69 (1986)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (14건)