본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

초등과학 영재들의 환경문제 인식에 따른 환경소양의 차이 : 낙관론과 비관론을 중심으로

Differences in environmental literacy according to environmental problem awareness of elementary science gifted students : Focusing on optimism and pessimism

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

본 연구는 학습자들의 환경 인식(낙관론/비관론)에 따른 환경 소양의 차이와 환경 인식의 차이에 대한 주요 원인을 찾기 위한 연구이다. 연구의 실행은 P 대학교의 부설 영재원에 재학중인 초등학교 5~6학년 19명을 대상으로 이루어졌으며, 환경소양 검사지와 환경 인식에 대한 서술식 설문지를 주요 데이터로 사용하였다. 연구의 결과, 질적 분류에 따라 낙관론군과 비관론군으로 분류되었으며, 환경소양에서는 낙관론군이 비관론군에 비해 환경소양에서 환경적 기능과 환경적 실천 영역이 우수한 것으로 나타났다. 또한 서술형 데이터 분석 결과, 낙관론군은 환경문제를 개인화된 문제로 인식하였으며, 우리의 행동과 노력으로 극복할 수 있다는 인식을 보여주고 있다. 반면, 비관론군은 환경문제를 기술과 시간의 문제로 인식하고 있으며, 우리의 행동과 노력과 연결시키지 못하는 인식을 보여주고 있다. 이 같은 결론을 바탕으로 환경교육의 관점에서 유용한 시사점을 주는 제언을 하였다.

Abstract

This study investigates the differences in environmental literacy according to learners' environmental awareness (optimism/pessimism) and to find the main causes of the differences in environmental awareness. The study was conducted on 19 elementary school students in grades 5 and 6 attending the P University Gifted Center, and the environmental literacy test and descriptive questionnaire on environmental awareness were used as the main data. As a result of the study, they were classified into “optimistic group” and “pessimistic group” according to qualitative classification, and in terms of environmental literacy, the optimistic group was found to be superior to the pessimistic group in environmental function and environmental practice areas. In addition, the results of the descriptive data analysis showed that the optimistic group recognized environmental problems as individualized problems and showed the perception that they can be overcome with our actions and efforts. On the other hand, the pessimistic group recognized environmental problems as problems of technology and time and showed the perception that they cannot be connected to our actions and efforts. Based on this conclusion, suggestions that provide useful implications from the perspective of environmental education were made.

참고문헌 (25)

  1. 교육부, "2022 개정 과학과 교육과정 총론", 교육부, ~ (2022)
  2. 김순식, "PBL 을 적용한 환경글쓰기 수업이초등학생들의 기후소양 및 환경감수성에 미치는 효과", 대한지구과학교육학회지, 15(3), pp.345~353 (2022)
  3. 김윤경, "환경소양 요인별 수준에따른 환경행동 실천 경험의 차이", 대한지구과학교육학회지, 16(1), pp.153~165 (2023)
  4. 김윤지, "SDGs 연계 교육에서 예비 지구과학 교사들의 탄소 소양", 대한지구과학교육학회지, 14(3), pp.292~301 (2021)
  5. 남윤경, "중등학생을 위한환경소양 검사 도구의 개발", 환경교육, 34(3), pp.319~337 (2021)
  6. 진옥화, "환경 소양 개념의 변천과 환경소양측정 연구", 환경교육, 18(2), pp.31~43 (2005)
  7. Ahmadabadi, H. Z., "Measuring sustainable performance of OECD countries considering CO2 emissions : A new optimistic-pessimistic distance friction Minimization Model", Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 96, pp.102055~ (2024)
  8. Ardoin, N. M., "Environmental education and K-12 student outcomes : A review and analysis of research", The Journal of Environmental Education, 49(1), pp.1~17 (2017)
  9. Bamberg, S., "Twenty years after Hines, Hungerford, and Tomera : A new meta-analysis of psycho-social determinants of pro-environmental behaviour", Journal of Environmental Psychology, 27(1), pp.14~25 (2007)
  10. Blei, D. M., "Latent dirichlet allocation", Journal of Machine Learning Research, 3, pp.993~1022 (2003)
  11. Chawla, L., "Growing up green : Becoming an agent of care for the natural world", The Journal of Developmental Processes, 4(1), pp.6~23 (2009)
  12. Disinger, J. F., "Environmental literacy", ERIC, 1992
  13. Gifford, R., "The dragons of inaction : Psychological barriers that limit climate change mitigation and adaptation", American Psychologist, 66(4), pp.290~302 (2011)
  14. Gopinathan, S., "Role of behavioral intention in implementation of green information systems among Malaysians", Research Square. PREPRINT, ~ (2024)
  15. Developing a framework for assessing environmental literacy, "Hollweg, K. S.", North American Association for Environmental Education, 122~ (2011)
  16. Kaiser, F. G., "Social learning towards a sustainable world", pp.111~126 (2009), Greenleaf
  17. Kamada, T., "An algorithm for drawing general undirected graphs", Information Processing Letters, 31(1), pp.7~15 (1989)
  18. Kasera, O. A., "Africa in global public policy : Theoretical perspectives and the role of international law in shaping public policy in Africa", International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, 8(6), pp.910~937 (2024)
  19. Kheradmandzadeh, E., "Presenting the financial behavior model of investors based on corporate social responsibility according to the role of perceptions of stock returns", International Journal of Nonlinear Analysis and Applications, 16(3), pp.343~360 (2025)
  20. Leiserowitz, A. A., "Climate change in the American mind: November 2016", Yale University and George Mason University, ~ (2016)
  21. Milfont, T. L., "A cross-cultural study of environmental motive concerns and their implications for pro-environmental behavior", Environment and Behavior, 42(6), pp.747~776 (2010)
  22. Ojala, M., "Hope and worry in climate change communication-Insights from publics in four Nordic countries", Environmental Communication, 13(2), pp.183~197 (2019)
  23. Rieckmann, M., "Education for sustainable development goals: Learning objectives" (2017), UNESCO publishing
  24. Sharma, P., "Eco-consciousness through the dialectics of hope and hopelessness in Cormac McCarthy’s the road", SCHOLARS : Journal of Arts & Humanities, 6(2), pp.79~90 (2024)
  25. Stevenson, R. B., "International handbook of research on environmental education" (2013), Routledge

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (10건)