AHP를 활용한 디자인 콘셉트의 창의성 평가에 관한 연구
Creativity evaluation of design concepts using AHP
0
조회
0
다운로드
8
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Purpose: Evaluation of the creativity level of design concepts. Methods: 14 winners of design concepts area of the 2015 Red dot Award are used to evaluate the creativity level of design concepts. Among the 14 winners, one is the highest award (; luminary) winner, 4 are the second highest award(; best of the best) winners, and the remaining 9 are winners. AHP model was developed to evaluate the creativity levels of design concepts, and applied to the 14 winners of the reddot award. Results: Originality and practicality have been used to evaluate creativity level of new product ideas in the previous study. In this study, it is identified that originality is composed of innovativeness and topicality, and practicality is composed of utility and realizability. The design concepts which won higher level awards have higher level of originality. Among the two dimensions of originality, topicality has more significant relationship than innovativeness. Conclusion: The design concepts with higher level of originality, especially higher level of topicality, have a fair chance to be recognized as creative. It is notable that higher level of originality does not guarantee higher profit. According to the previous studies on the commercial success of new products, practicality is more important than originality.
Abstract
Purpose: Evaluation of the creativity level of design concepts. Methods: 14 winners of design concepts area of the 2015 Red dot Award are used to evaluate the creativity level of design concepts. Among the 14 winners, one is the highest award (; luminary) winner, 4 are the second highest award(; best of the best) winners, and the remaining 9 are winners. AHP model was developed to evaluate the creativity levels of design concepts, and applied to the 14 winners of the reddot award. Results: Originality and practicality have been used to evaluate creativity level of new product ideas in the previous study. In this study, it is identified that originality is composed of innovativeness and topicality, and practicality is composed of utility and realizability. The design concepts which won higher level awards have higher level of originality. Among the two dimensions of originality, topicality has more significant relationship than innovativeness. Conclusion: The design concepts with higher level of originality, especially higher level of topicality, have a fair chance to be recognized as creative. It is notable that higher level of originality does not guarantee higher profit. According to the previous studies on the commercial success of new products, practicality is more important than originality.
참고문헌 (28)
- Altshuller, G., "Creativity as an Exact Science" (1984), Gordon and Breach
- Amabile, T. M., "Creativity and innovation in organizations", Harvard Business Review, 5 (1996)
- Amabile, T. M., "Creativity in the R&D Laboratory" (1987), Center for Creativity Leadership
- Boden, M., "The Creative Mind : Myths and Mechanisms" (1992), Basic Books
- Clayton, M., "What's the BIG Idea?", Harvard Business School Case 602-105, ~ (2001)
- Cropley, A. J, "Creativity and cognition : producting effective novelty", Roeper Review, 21, pp.253~260 (1999)
- Finke, R. A., "Creative Imagery : Discoveries and Inventions in Visualization" (1990), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
- Finke, R. A., "Explorations of Creative visual Synthesis in Mental Imagery", Memory &Cognition, 16(3), pp.252~257 (1998)
- Goldenberg, J., "Toward identifying the inventive templates of new products : a channeled ideation approach", Journal of Marketing Research, 36, pp.200~210 (1999)
- Goldenberg, J., "The idea itself and the circumstances of its emergence as predictors of new product success", Management Science, 47, pp.69~84 (2001)
- 허건, "창의적인 식품 개발에 있어서 SIT의 효과성에 관한 연구 - H사의 신제품을 중심으로 -", 품질경영학회지, 44(1), pp.95~108 (2016), 한국품질경영학회[DOI]
- Horowitz, R., "From TRIZ to ASIT in 4 Steps", TRIZ journal (2001)
- Jang, K. H., "A study on the Improvement of Buyer Utility Map in the Blue Ocean Strategy", 석사, pp.2009
- Jo, K. T., "The Analytic Hierarchy Process" (2003), Donghyun Publisher
- Jo, K. T., "Decision Making for Leaders" (2003), Donghyun Publisher
- 강익선, "아이디어의 창의성과 고객만족의 측정에 관한 연구", 품질경영학회지, 44(1), pp.139~152 (2016), 한국품질경영학회[DOI]
- Kim, W. C., "Blue Ocean Strategy" (2005), Kyobobook Publishers
- Kim, E. S., "A Comparative Study on the Effectiveness of the Creative Tools", 석사, pp.2012
- Kim, E. J., "Development of the Evaluation Tool for Creativity in Design. PhD. diss., Chonbuk National University", PhD, pp.2008
- 이충석, "R&D 기술 선정을 위한 시계열 특허 분석 기반 지능형 의사결정지원시스템", 지능정보연구, 18(3), pp.79~96 (2012), 한국지능정보시스템학회
- Lubart, T. I., "Creativity Thinking and Problem Solving" (1994), Academic Press
- Na, Y. S., "The Effect of New Product Creativity on Market Performance", 석사, pp.2015
- 박영택, "품질경영과 창의혁신", 품질경영학회지, 43(1), pp.1~10 (2015), 한국품질경영학회[DOI]
- Shin, J. H., "Analysis of Buyer Utility Map in Creative Products Design", 석사, pp.2013
- Stevens, G., "3,000 Raw Ideas Equals 1 Commercial Sucess!", Research Technology Management, 40, pp.16~27 (1997)
- Thomas L. Saaty, "A Scaling Method for Priorities in Hierarchical Structures", Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 15, pp.234~281 (1977)
- Thomas L. Saaty, "How to make a decision : The Analytic Hierarchy Process", European Journal of Operational Research, 48, pp.9~26 (1990)
- Yu, S. B., "A Study on SIT 5 Thinking Tools and Utility Levers", 석사, pp.2014