근세 한국과 중국의 道里記체계 비교연구

Abstract

This study focused on the fact that existing studies on Dorigi(道里記) Itinerary during the Joseon Dynasty are missing the perspective of comparative analysis with Chinese one, which is believed to have been greatly influenced politically and culturally each other. Through comparison, I have analyzed three axes: the presence of genealogical influence spread each other, the differences in the purposes and usage, and the geographic differences between the two countries. The subjects of analysis include major “Dorogo(道路考)”, Yeojigo Dorijo from “Dongguk Munheonbigo”(東国文献備考輿地考道里条), “Doripyo(道里表)”, and Kim Jeong-ho(金正浩)’s “Daedongjiji(大東地志)”, in Josen Korea, and two Chinese Dorigi Itineraries, one from Ming Dynasty and the other from Qing Dynasty. As a result, significant similarities between the two nations were confirmed in the selection and notation of place names, marking of transit points, and classification of routes, making the existence of genealogical exchanges each other seem certain. Meanwhile, unlike the Chinese side, the Joseon Dynasty's Dorigi did not contain miscellaneous information targeting the private sector such as commerce, but instead was based on the fusion of natural and human geographical information such as mountains and streams with reads, confirming a tendency to place more importance on expressing national geographical awareness than practicality.