‘아동·청소년이용음란물’의 개념 및 판단기준
A Study on the Term and the Standard of Judgment of “Child or Juvenile Pornography”
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Recently, the Supreme Court suggested the standard of judgment of “child or juvenile pornography” where persons or representations that can be perceived as children or juveniles appear(2013Do4503). According to the standard, a depiction’s main content, appearances, states of physical development and identities of the characters, etc. must be considered in judging whether it is “child or juvenile pornography” or not, and it is not to be easily concluded that the depiction is “child or juvenile pornography”, even if the characters look somewhat younger. But I guess that this standard will not have a great effect on the judgment, because there are the conceptual element of “can be” and the principle of “in dubio pro reo”. From the point of view of the principle of clarity, the use of the conceptual element like “can be” is to be restrained in articles of criminal law, if possible. Therefore, it is proper that the term “child or juvenile pornography” should be reorganized as a depiction where real persons appear. The gap of punishment resulting from here will not happen. Criminal Act and Information and Communications Network Act will bridge the gap.
Abstract
Recently, the Supreme Court suggested the standard of judgment of “child or juvenile pornography” where persons or representations that can be perceived as children or juveniles appear(2013Do4503). According to the standard, a depiction’s main content, appearances, states of physical development and identities of the characters, etc. must be considered in judging whether it is “child or juvenile pornography” or not, and it is not to be easily concluded that the depiction is “child or juvenile pornography”, even if the characters look somewhat younger. But I guess that this standard will not have a great effect on the judgment, because there are the conceptual element of “can be” and the principle of “in dubio pro reo”. From the point of view of the principle of clarity, the use of the conceptual element like “can be” is to be restrained in articles of criminal law, if possible. Therefore, it is proper that the term “child or juvenile pornography” should be reorganized as a depiction where real persons appear. The gap of punishment resulting from here will not happen. Criminal Act and Information and Communications Network Act will bridge the gap.
참고문헌 (27)
- 고제성, "구 아동·청소년의 성보호에 관한 법률 제2조 제5호의 ‘아동·청소년으로 인식될 수 있는 사람이 등장하는 아동·청소년이용음란물’인지판단하는 기준", 대법원판례해설, (102) (2015)
- 김성규, "아동·청소년이용음란물의 개념적 한정성(限定性)-「아동·청소년의 성보호에 관한 법률」제2조의 문제점 -", 형사정책, 25(1), pp.227~247 (2013), 한국형사정책학회
- 김성진, "미국에서의 아동성범죄에 대한 형사법적 대응 :아동음란물의 규제입법 및 인터넷상 함정수사를 중심으로", 중앙법학, 15(1), pp.91~120 (2013), 중앙법학회
- 김일수, "새로쓴 형법각론", pp.223~224 (2015), 박영사
- 배종대, "형법각론" (2015), 홍문사
- 박경신, "춘향전을 영화로 만들어도 아동성범죄인가", 경향신문, ~ (2012)
- 박용철, "아동ㆍ청소년이용음란물의 범위에 대하여", 강원법학, 43, pp.237~268 (2014), 비교법학연구소
- 심희기, "아동 포르노그라피와 한국의 청소년 성보호법", 비교형사법연구, 5(2-1), pp.33~904 (2003), 한국비교형사법학회
- 임웅, "형법상명확성의 원칙", 성균관법학, 16(1), pp.481~498 (2004), 법학연구소
- 임정호, "아동·청소년의 성보호에 관한 법률상 아동음란물 정의규정에 대한 미국법과의 비교 연구", 법학논총, 25(3), pp.9~33 (2013), 법학연구소
- Eser, Albin, "StrafrechtⅠ" (1992)
- Fischer, Thomas, "Strafgesetzbuch", pp.1~4 (2015)
- Laufhütte, Heinrich Wilhelm, "Strafgesetzbuch: Leipziger Kommentar, Band 6" (2010)
- Schönke, Adolf, "Strafgesetzbuch : Kommentar" (2014)
- "제311회국회(정기회) 아동·여성대상성폭력대책특별위원회회의록(법안심사소위원회) 제4호, 2012. 11. 14", ~ (2012)
- "법무부, 국민이 알기 쉽도록 ｢형법｣ 개정 추진", 법무부(검찰국 형사법제과), ~ (2015)
- "아동포르노 소지자 일본도 처벌하기로", 한겨레신문, ~ (2014)
- "일본, 아동 포르노 단순 소지자도 15일부터 처벌", 연합뉴스, ~ (2015)
- "국회 의안정보시스템"[URL]
- "대한민국 법원 종합법률정보"[URL]
- "법무부"[URL]
- "법제처 국가법령정보센터"[URL]
- "헌법재판소"[URL]