문서위조죄에서의 복사와 행사의 개념
0
조회
0
다운로드
8
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Any copies of documents or drawings reproduced using the electronic reproduction machines, facsimile telegraphs or other similar apparatus should be considered as document or drawing in Criminal Law. But it seems not to coincide with the concept of copy and meaning of duplicated document. Especially as far as media records, such as another person's electromagnetic records are concerned, there are many unsettled problems. The interests protected by law of crime concerning Documents are public credibility. so I think that constituent elements of a crime have to be interpreted by means of improving public credibility. That's to say that we should connect with crime-concerning condition and something protected by criminal law. but Supreme court didn't accept copies of documents concerning copy from documents to electromagnetic records in 2007do7480 and 2008do 5200. Any copies of documents should be protected because they establish the existence of original documents. that's reason that Any copies of documents reproduced using the electronic reproduction machines, facsimile telegraphs or other similar apparatus should be considered as document or drawing in Criminal Law. So someone would scan the documents and make new electromagnetic reproduction records of the scanned document, we must regard that as duplicated documents.
Abstract
Any copies of documents or drawings reproduced using the electronic reproduction machines, facsimile telegraphs or other similar apparatus should be considered as document or drawing in Criminal Law. But it seems not to coincide with the concept of copy and meaning of duplicated document. Especially as far as media records, such as another person's electromagnetic records are concerned, there are many unsettled problems. The interests protected by law of crime concerning Documents are public credibility. so I think that constituent elements of a crime have to be interpreted by means of improving public credibility. That's to say that we should connect with crime-concerning condition and something protected by criminal law. but Supreme court didn't accept copies of documents concerning copy from documents to electromagnetic records in 2007do7480 and 2008do 5200. Any copies of documents should be protected because they establish the existence of original documents. that's reason that Any copies of documents reproduced using the electronic reproduction machines, facsimile telegraphs or other similar apparatus should be considered as document or drawing in Criminal Law. So someone would scan the documents and make new electromagnetic reproduction records of the scanned document, we must regard that as duplicated documents.
참고문헌 (27)
- 김일수, "복사문서도 문서위조 및 동 행사죄의 객체인 문서인가?", 법률구조 (1992)
- 김일수, "형법각론" (2007), 박영사
- 류전철, "위조범죄의 보호법익으로서의 ‘공공의 신용’과 복사물", 형사판례연구, 13 (2005), 한국형사판례연구회
- 류전철, "문서죄에 대한 개정 입법론", 형사법연구, (22) (2004), 한국형사법학회
- 류전철, "보호법익으로서 공공의 신용 의 형법해석론상 의미", 형사법연구, (18), pp.309~332 (2002), 한국형사법학회
- 류전철, "형법상 문서개념의 재구성", 형사법연구, (11) (1999), 한국형사법학회
- 박상기, "형법각론" (2008), 박영사
- 배종대, "형법각론" (2006), 홍문사
- 법무부, "형법개정법률안 제안이유서", ~ (1992)
- 손동권, "형법각론" (2006), 율곡출판사
- 양천수, "형법상 법익 개념의 새로운 근거설정 필요성과 가능성", 고려법학, 47 (2006), 고려대학교 법학연구원
- 오영근, "형법각론" (2009), 박영사
- 이재상, "형법각론" (2009), 박영사
- 이정원, "문서위조 및 동 행사죄의 객체로서의 복사문서", 영남법학, (26) (2008), 영남대학교 법학연구소
- 이형국, "형법각론" (2007), 법문사
- 정성근, "형법각론" (2006), 삼지사
- 정영일, "형법각론" (2008), 박영사
- 최우찬, "형법상 복사문서의 불법사용", 인권과 공익법, 1 (2007), 서강대학교 법학연구소
- 하태훈, "복사문서의 문서성", 형사판례연구, 1 (1993), 한국형사판례연구회
- Hassemer, Winfried, "Grundlinien einer personalen Rechtsgutslehre. in: Strafen im rechtsstaat" (2000)
- Hassemer, Winfried, "Theorie und Soziologie des Verbrechens", ~ (1973)
- Joecks, "Münchener Kommentar zum Strafgegetzbuch, Bd. 3" (2005), Beck Juristischer Verlag
- Lackner, Karl, "Strafgesetzbuch (StGB)" (2001), C.H.Beck
- Rudolphi, Hans-Joachim, "Systematischer Kommentar zum Strafgezetzbuch, 5. 6, bzw. 7. Aufl" (2003), Luchterhand
- Schönke, Adolf, "Strafgezetzbuch, 26. Aufl" (2001), C.H.Beck
- Tröndle, Herbert, "Strafgezetzbuch, 51. Aufl" (2003), C.H.Beck
- 1, 25. Aufl, "Strafrecht Besonderer Teil", pp.2001, Wessels, Johannes