진술과 기록의 증거능력
Admissibility of Recorded Statement
0
조회
0
다운로드
7
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Although vivid testimony of the witness and/or the defendant in the courtroom is very important in fact-finding, hearsay evidences are widely accepted in relation to the criminal cases. Recently diverse medias such as documents, audio-tapes, video-tapes, computer discs or electronic files which recorded statements spoken by a private person under the private circumstance are available as evidences to prove the fact asserted in such statements. According to the Criminal Procedure Act in Korea the document which contains the statements of the defendant or the witness written by a private person is admissible when autograph, sign or seal of the writer or the speaker is certified and correctness of recording is confirmed by the writer or the speaker in the courtroom during the trial. But the document which contains the statement of the defendant is admissible when correctness of recording is confirmed by the writer in the courtroom during the trial and especially reliable circumstance is affirmed, even if the speaker deny the statement in the document. With regard to the admissibility of recorded statement, the authentication of record might be established by the speaker or the recorder. And the correctness of recording in principle should be confirmed by the speaker. But the defendant is inclined to deny his/her own past statement which may be construed as evidence leading to conviction. So the recorder might confirm the correctness of recording if the speaker made the statement under the especially reliable circumstance.
Abstract
Although vivid testimony of the witness and/or the defendant in the courtroom is very important in fact-finding, hearsay evidences are widely accepted in relation to the criminal cases. Recently diverse medias such as documents, audio-tapes, video-tapes, computer discs or electronic files which recorded statements spoken by a private person under the private circumstance are available as evidences to prove the fact asserted in such statements. According to the Criminal Procedure Act in Korea the document which contains the statements of the defendant or the witness written by a private person is admissible when autograph, sign or seal of the writer or the speaker is certified and correctness of recording is confirmed by the writer or the speaker in the courtroom during the trial. But the document which contains the statement of the defendant is admissible when correctness of recording is confirmed by the writer in the courtroom during the trial and especially reliable circumstance is affirmed, even if the speaker deny the statement in the document. With regard to the admissibility of recorded statement, the authentication of record might be established by the speaker or the recorder. And the correctness of recording in principle should be confirmed by the speaker. But the defendant is inclined to deny his/her own past statement which may be construed as evidence leading to conviction. So the recorder might confirm the correctness of recording if the speaker made the statement under the especially reliable circumstance.
참고문헌 (47)
- Best, "Evidence" (2007), Aspen Publishers
- "Black’s Law Dictionary" (2004)
- Eisenberg, Ulrich, "Beweisrecht der StPO" (2008), C. H. Beck
- Fisher, George, "Evidence" (2002), Foundation Press
- 강구진, "형사소송법원론" (1982)
- 강동범, "녹음테이프의 증거능력", 형사판례연구, 6 (1998)
- 권오걸, "전문증거의 개념과 범위", 형사법연구, 24(1), pp.217~246 (2012), 한국형사법학회[DOI]
- 권오병, "소위 특신상태와 증거능력에 관한 문제", 법조 (1964)
- 권오병, "형사증거법론" (1965), 법문사
- 김대휘, "사진과 비디오테이프의 증거능력", 형사판례연구, 6 (1998)
- 김민기, "형사소송법상 특신상태의 의미와 인정방법, In 형사재판의 쟁점과 과제" (2008), 사법발전재단
- 김영기, "디지털 증거의 진정성립부인과 증거능력 부여 방안", 형사판례연구, 19, pp.509~539 (2011), 한국형사판례연구회
- 김일룡, "증거의 진정성과 증거규정 체계의 재구성 - 미국연방증거규칙으로부터의 시사점-", 형사법의 신동향, (32), pp.50~83 (2011), 대검찰청
- 김형진, "공판외 진술의 증거능력", 재판자료, 23 (1984), 법원행정처
- 노명선, "형사소송법" (2009), 성균관대학교 출판부
- 대검찰청, "형사소송법 제정․개정 자료집" (1997)
- 박미숙, "사인에 의한 비밀녹음테이프의 증거능력", 형사판례연구, 11 (2003)
- 박송하, "서증의 성립진정과 내용의 진정", 재판자료, 23 (1984), 법원행정처
- 박용철, "변호사가 의뢰인에게 작성해 준 의견서가 압수된 경우 그 의견서의 증거능력 - 대법원 2012. 5. 17. 2009도6788 판결 -", 형사법연구, 24(2), pp.335~362 (2012), 한국형사법학회[DOI]
- 배종대, "신형사소송법" (2012), 홍문사
- 백형구, "조해 형사소송법" (2002)
- 법원행정처, "법원실무제요: 형사 II" (2008)
- 서일교, "한국의 민주주의와 신형사소송법의 초점", 법정, 10(11) (1955)
- 서희석, "우리 형사소송법상의 전문법칙", 재판자료, 23 (1984), 법원행정처
- 손동권, "형사소송법 개정신판" (2010), 세창출판사
- 송병기, "한말근대법령자료집 V" (1971), 대한민국국회도서관
- 송시섭, "변호사 법률의견서의 증거능력 -대법원 2012. 5. 17. 2009도6788 판결을 중심으로-", 동아법학, (58), pp.401~422 (2013), 법학연구소
- 신동운, "일제하의 형사절차에 관한 연구, In 한국법사학논총(박병호교수환갑기념) II" (1991)
- 신동운, "신형사소송법 제4판" (2012), 법문사
- 원혜욱, "불법감청에 의한 대화녹음테이프의 증거능력", 형사판례연구, 10 (2002)
- 이광일, "수사서류의 증거능력", 재판자료, 22 (1984), 법원행정처
- 이상원, "전자증거와 원본증거의 법칙", 형사법의 신동향, (36), pp.50~104 (2012), 대검찰청
- 이완규, "사인작성 컴퓨터문서의 진정성립입증과 증거능력", 형사판례연구, 16 (2008)
- 이완규, "진술증거의 전문증거성과 진정성 문제의 구별", 형사판례연구, 20, pp.527~559 (2012), 한국형사판례연구회
- 이완규, "해외주재 영사작성 진술기재서면의 성질과 증거능력", 형사판례연구, 16 (2008)
- 이완규, "형사소송법상 증거법의 연혁과 미래-조서 규정을 중심으로", 형사법연구, 19(3-하), pp.111~136 (2007), 한국형사법학회
- 백승민, "미국 증거법" (2009), 탐구사
- 이은모, (2011), 박영사
- 이재상, "형사소송법" (2012), 박영사
- 임동규, "형사소송법" (2012), 법문사
- 전봉진, "피고인 작성의 진술서", 재판자료, 23 (1984), 법원행정처
- 정진연, "형사소송법 제313조 제1항의 해석과 관련한 소고", 성균관법학, 17(3), pp.357~382 (2005), 법학연구소
- 최병각, "공판중심주의와 참고인진술조서", 형사판례연구, 15 (2007)
- 최병각, "사인 작성 진술서면의 증거능력", 홍익법학, 14(1), pp.391~417 (2013), 법학연구소
- 최병각, "영상녹화물에 수록된 성폭력범죄피해자의 진술", 동아법학, (50), pp.201~230 (2011), 법학연구소
- 최병각, "탄핵증거로서의 증거능력과 증거조사", 형사법연구, 22(1), pp.383~405 (2010), 한국형사법학회
- 하태훈, "사인이 비밀리에 녹음한 녹음테이프의 증거능력", 형사판례연구, 8 (2000)