형사절차에서 전자적 증거의 원본성과 의미와 기능
The Meaning and Function of Originality(Authenticity) of Electronic Evidence in Criminal Procedure
0
조회
0
다운로드
4
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This paper addresses several important evidentiary issues arising when the prosecutor seeks to admit computer records or electronically stored data in court or the courts make a decision about that, including admissibility of evidence, hearsay rule and the foundation to establish the authenticity or originality of computer records or electronically stored data. In Korean Criminal Procedural Law is there no special statute ruling how the judge should decide the admissibility of electronic evidence. In cases which the Korean Supreme Court had decided if the electronic evidence is admissible to the court have Judges decided the admissibility of hearsay evidence by analogy with the Article 313 of Korean Criminal Procedural Law. But this paper criticizes the attitude of these precedents. Above all it is to emphasize that the defendant may challenge the authenticity of the electronic records by challenging the identity of their author, and the authorship cannot be replaced with authenticity or originality. The lawmaker and the Courts have to find proper prerequisites for confirming the author of electronic evidence.
Abstract
This paper addresses several important evidentiary issues arising when the prosecutor seeks to admit computer records or electronically stored data in court or the courts make a decision about that, including admissibility of evidence, hearsay rule and the foundation to establish the authenticity or originality of computer records or electronically stored data. In Korean Criminal Procedural Law is there no special statute ruling how the judge should decide the admissibility of electronic evidence. In cases which the Korean Supreme Court had decided if the electronic evidence is admissible to the court have Judges decided the admissibility of hearsay evidence by analogy with the Article 313 of Korean Criminal Procedural Law. But this paper criticizes the attitude of these precedents. Above all it is to emphasize that the defendant may challenge the authenticity of the electronic records by challenging the identity of their author, and the authorship cannot be replaced with authenticity or originality. The lawmaker and the Courts have to find proper prerequisites for confirming the author of electronic evidence.
참고문헌 (18)
- The United States Department for Justice Computer Crime and Intellectual Property Section Criminal Division, "Prosecuting Computer Crimes", published by Office of Legal Education Executive Office for United States Attorneys, ~ (2010)
- The United States Department for Justice Computer Crime and Intellectual Property Section Criminal Division, "Searching and Seizing Computers and Obtaining Electronic Evidence in Criminal Investigations", published by Office of Legal Education Executive Office for United States Attorneys, ~ (2009)
- 강맹진, "우리나라 디지털 증거수사의 효율성 증진방안", 한국콘텐츠학회 논문지, 7(2), pp.180~190 (2007), 한국콘텐츠학회
- 권오걸, "디지털증거의 개념ㆍ특성 및 증거능력의 요건", IT와 법연구, 5(5), pp.291~318 (2011), IT와 법연구소
- 김성룡, "IT 기술의 발달에 따른 형사절차법의 문제점과 대처방안(I)-위치추적을 중심으로, IT와 법 연구", 경북대학교 IT와 법연구소, 3, pp.161~177 (2009)
- 김성룡, "디지털 시대의 압수ㆍ수색과 관련한 미국 연방법원의 판단기준", IT와 법연구, (6), pp.239~261 (2012), IT와 법연구소
- 김성룡, "이메일 압수․수색에 관한 독일 연방헌법재판소 결정의 주요 내용과 그 시사점", 법학논고, (32), pp.181~214 (2010), 법학연구원
- 박수희, "전자증거의 수집과 강제수사", 한국공안행정학회보, 16(4), pp.125~154 (2007), 한국공안행정학회
- 손동권, "새로이 입법화된 디지털 증거의 압수·수색제도에 관한 연구 - 특히 추가적 보완입법의 문제 -", 형사정책, 23(2), pp.325~349 (2011), 한국형사정책학회
- 양근원, "증거법상의 새로운 화두 : 디지털 증거와 디지털 포렌식, 경찰법연구", 한국경찰법학회, 5(1), pp.136~163 (2007)
- 오기두, "전자증거의 증거능력, 법률신문(2012년 8월 27일 제4059호) 판례ㆍ논단(http:", LawPnnn, pp.Pnnyn, PnnynContent.aspx?m=pnnyn&serial=2107)
- 원혜욱, "과학적 수사방법에 의한 증거수집- 전자증거의 압수·수색을 중심으로 -", 비교형사법연구, 5(2-1), pp.7~190 (2003), 한국비교형사법학회
- 이경열, "디지털정보 관련 증거의 압수·수색 규정의 도입방안 연구", 홍익법학, 13(3), pp.483~521 (2012), 법학연구소
- 이숙연, "전자정보에 대한 압수수색과 기본권, 그리고 영장주의에 관하여 - 대법원 2011모1190 결정에 대한 평석을 중심으로 한 연구 -", 헌법학연구, 18(1), pp.1~44 (2012), 한국헌법학회
- 전명길, "디지털증거의 수집과 증거능력", 법학연구, (41), pp.317~336 (2011), 한국법학회
- 전승수, "디지털 정보에 대한 압수수색영장의 집행- 대법원 2011. 5. 26.자 2009모1190 결정 -", 법조, 61(7), pp.237~276 (2012), 법조협회
- 조상수, "디지털 증거의 무결성 보장 절차에 대한 개선", 정보과학회논문지 : 정보통신, 39(2), pp.184~191 (2012), 한국정보과학회
- 탁희성, "전자증거의 압수·수색에 관한 일고찰", 형사정책연구, 15(1), pp.21~62 (2004), 한국형사정책연구원