본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

1994년의 호명, 주체로서의 벌새 만들기

The Interpellation in 1994, Making Hummingbird as Subject

0

조회

0

다운로드

4

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류예술일반

초록

The purposes of this study are to find out what Eun-hee, the protagonist of House of Hummingbird (KIM Bora, 2018), interpellates as a subject, to grasp how Ideological State Apparatuses(ISA) are operated, and to understand the reason why the film set in 1994 is important at the present time. The close textual analysis has been performed with the theoretical frameworks of the educational ISA and the family ISA that the two dominant ISAs suggested by Althusser. As a result the analysis Ideological State Apparatuses represented by Schools and the Family maintained and reinforced the capitalist ideologies and the mode of production in 1994 through the direct and indirect violence on Eun-hee. Repressive patriarchal ideology and the violence of the state power strongly supported that. The significance of the film can be viewed as following three. The first, House of Hummingbird makes us ruminate on the present educational and family ISA, which have been grown strongly, via Eun-hee’s daily life in 1994. The second, the film make us ask to introspect the historical trauma by means of narrativizing the violence on Eun-hee that is the result of the combination of RSA and ISA, in other words penetration of the state power into everyday life. Finally, the film gives us the strict warning that ISA associated with RSA may annihilate individuals’ free will by representing the death of Young-ji that is the consequence of ruling ideology’s incapacitating anti-ideological forces, in other words, the state power’s eliminating resistant individuals.

Abstract

The purposes of this study are to find out what Eun-hee, the protagonist of House of Hummingbird (KIM Bora, 2018), interpellates as a subject, to grasp how Ideological State Apparatuses(ISA) are operated, and to understand the reason why the film set in 1994 is important at the present time. The close textual analysis has been performed with the theoretical frameworks of the educational ISA and the family ISA that the two dominant ISAs suggested by Althusser. As a result the analysis Ideological State Apparatuses represented by Schools and the Family maintained and reinforced the capitalist ideologies and the mode of production in 1994 through the direct and indirect violence on Eun-hee. Repressive patriarchal ideology and the violence of the state power strongly supported that. The significance of the film can be viewed as following three. The first, House of Hummingbird makes us ruminate on the present educational and family ISA, which have been grown strongly, via Eun-hee’s daily life in 1994. The second, the film make us ask to introspect the historical trauma by means of narrativizing the violence on Eun-hee that is the result of the combination of RSA and ISA, in other words penetration of the state power into everyday life. Finally, the film gives us the strict warning that ISA associated with RSA may annihilate individuals’ free will by representing the death of Young-ji that is the consequence of ruling ideology’s incapacitating anti-ideological forces, in other words, the state power’s eliminating resistant individuals.

참고문헌 (18)

  1. 원용진, "(새로 쓴) 대중 문화의 패러다임" (2010), 한나래출판사
  2. Althusser, L., "아미엥에서의 주장" (1991), 솔
  3. Althusser, L., "재생산에 대하여" (2007), 동문선
  4. Callinicos, A., "바로 읽는 알뛰세" (1992), 백의
  5. 강경덕, "알튀세르와 버틀러, 발리바르 - 주체화 양식의 논점과 일반화", 철학연구, (53), pp.159~206 (2016), 철학연구소
  6. 김명혜, "영화 <여고괴담 두 번째 이야기>에 나타난 동성애 주체성 재현방식", 미디어, 젠더 & 문화, (4) (2005)
  7. 김은주, "대중(multitude)의 ‘호명’에서 감정의 역할 ‒『신학정치론』 히브리 신정의 사례와 알튀세르의 스피노자 독해에서 빠진 것‒", 철학, (139), pp.197~228 (2019), 한국철학회[DOI]
  8. 심광현, "영화적 미메시스와 이데올로기 : 브레히트적 영화와 알튀세르 이데올로기론의 현행화를 중심으로", 문화과학, (92) (2017)
  9. 윤복실, "TV 드라마 <디어 마이 프렌즈>에 재현된 가부장 이데올로기 고찰", 한국사상과 문화, (89), pp.439~466 (2017), 한국사상문화학회
  10. 윤태진, "디지털 게임의 마법 : ‘주체’와 ‘호명’의 환상", 게임산업저널, (10) (2005)
  11. 전주희, "‘가족의 위기’ 시대, 가족 이데올로기의 재구성 : 알튀세르의 이데올로기론을 중심으로", 문화과학, (92) (2017)
  12. 진태원, "알튀세르 효과" (2011), 그린비출판사
  13. 진태원, "마르크스와 알튀세르 사이의 푸코", 철학사상, (68), pp.195~237 (2018), 철학사상연구소[DOI]
  14. 최원, "알튀세르 효과" (2011), 그린비출판사
  15. 한승옥, "페미니즘적 시각에서 본 『무정』 -가부장제 이데올로기에 희생된 젊은이들-", 어문논집, (58), pp.383~406 (2008), 민족어문학회
  16. 허석헌, "포스트모더니즘과 주체 6: 알튀세르와 이데올로기적 주체", 제3시대, 105호, ~ (2017)
  17. Philips, D., "Understanding Film: Marxist Perspectives" (2005), Pluto Press
  18. Gillot, P., "알튀세르 효과" (2011), 그린비

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (5건)