본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

今本『孔子家語』所附『後序』考 ―以日藏『孝經述議』引文為參照

A Textual Study of Post order Attached to Confucius Family Language:Reference to the Quotations of the Commentary on the Filial Piety in Japan

1

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

At the end of the book 「Confucius’s Family Language」 by Liu Shi Yu Hai Tang ben, Si Kuben, and Japan's Kuan Yong ben, there is a「Postscript」 without author. Its main message are about an authenticity, author, character ect. Through the analysis of Liu Xuan’s 「Preface of the Family Words」, 「Postscript of family Words」 in Jing Du University in Japan and 「Postscript」 the current book, we can know 「Postscript」 has many errors. At the same time, according to the different name 「Preface of the Family Words」 and 「Postscript of Family Words」 in the 「Shu Yi」, we can know there are two kinds of works in the current 「Postscript」, the first ons is written by Kong an guo and the second one is posterity’s retouch of the 「Confucius’s Family Language」. Through the analysis of the three books mensioned so far, we can know these books were not written by same writter.

Abstract

At the end of the book 「Confucius’s Family Language」 by Liu Shi Yu Hai Tang ben, Si Kuben, and Japan's Kuan Yong ben, there is a「Postscript」 without author. Its main message are about an authenticity, author, character ect. Through the analysis of Liu Xuan’s 「Preface of the Family Words」, 「Postscript of family Words」 in Jing Du University in Japan and 「Postscript」 the current book, we can know 「Postscript」 has many errors. At the same time, according to the different name 「Preface of the Family Words」 and 「Postscript of Family Words」 in the 「Shu Yi」, we can know there are two kinds of works in the current 「Postscript」, the first ons is written by Kong an guo and the second one is posterity’s retouch of the 「Confucius’s Family Language」. Through the analysis of the three books mensioned so far, we can know these books were not written by same writter.

참고문헌 (8)

  1. 李學勤, "竹簡家語與漢魏孔氏家學", 孔子研究, (2) (1987)
  2. 可參張岩, "孔子家語研究綜述", 孔子研究, (4) (2004)
  3. 胡平生, "阜陽雙古堆漢簡與孔子家語", 國學研究, 7
  4. 寧鎮疆, "家語的“層累”形成考論——阜陽雙古堆一號木牘所見章題與今本家語之比較", 齊魯學刊, (3) (2007)
  5. 張固也, "從孔子家語·後序看其成書過程", 魯東大學學報, (5) (2009)
  6. 郝虹, "孔子家語是否王肅偽作問題新探——從漢魏思想史角度的辨析", 孔子研究, (1) (2011)
  7. 李傳軍, "孔子家語辨疑", 孔子研究, (2) (2004)
  8. 巫雪如, "孔子閒居及論禮若干異文的語言分析——兼論孔子家語的 成書問題", 漢學研究, 28(4) (2010)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (11건)