본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

한국 문인들의 韓愈 「送窮文」변용 창작 試論

A Study on ancient Korean literati's transfiguration of Han Yu's SongQiongWen(送窮文): Focus on their Recognition and Transformation of Style, Borrowing of Subject Matter

0

조회

0

다운로드

5

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

Han Yu(韓愈)'s SongQiongWen(送窮文) has its own complex and ambiguous characteristics. So, each previous editors attributed it to a different style in their anthology. These complex features have also influenced the creation of ancient Korean writers who have honored Han Yu's prose works as a paradigm. These forms of creation in ancient Korea can be summarized as two main ways. First, It is the series of GuShiMaMun(驅詩魔文), which is one of writing form ZaWen(雜文) that has strong fable character. Second, It is the series of SongDuShinMun(送痘神文), which is one of writing form ZaWen or Poetry(詩詞) that has strong character of funeral oration(祭文). These can be attributed to the stylistic complexities of Han Yu's SongQiongWen. Especially, as series of SongDuShinMun that can be seen as cultural products which were occurred from the backdrop of the cultural environment in the late Joseon Dynasty. Therefore, these are worth the research as an example of the creative form of literature that Joseon writers have adopted and transformed Chinese literature independently.

Abstract

Han Yu(韓愈)'s SongQiongWen(送窮文) has its own complex and ambiguous characteristics. So, each previous editors attributed it to a different style in their anthology. These complex features have also influenced the creation of ancient Korean writers who have honored Han Yu's prose works as a paradigm. These forms of creation in ancient Korea can be summarized as two main ways. First, It is the series of GuShiMaMun(驅詩魔文), which is one of writing form ZaWen(雜文) that has strong fable character. Second, It is the series of SongDuShinMun(送痘神文), which is one of writing form ZaWen or Poetry(詩詞) that has strong character of funeral oration(祭文). These can be attributed to the stylistic complexities of Han Yu's SongQiongWen. Especially, as series of SongDuShinMun that can be seen as cultural products which were occurred from the backdrop of the cultural environment in the late Joseon Dynasty. Therefore, these are worth the research as an example of the creative form of literature that Joseon writers have adopted and transformed Chinese literature independently.

참고문헌 (24)

  1. 宗懔, "荆楚歲時記" (1987), 山西人民出版社
  2. 徐師曾, "文體明辨序說" (1998), 人民文學出版社
  3. 吳曾祺, "涵芬樓古今文鈔 99~100冊" (1914), 商務印書館
  4. 顧廷龍, "續修四庫全書 史部ㆍ時令 第885册" (1995), 上海古籍出版社
  5. 高海夫, "唐宋八大家文鈔校注集評" (1998), 三秦出版社
  6. 민족문화추진회 편집부, "立巖集 권6" (1988), 민족문화추진회
  7. 민족문화추진회 편집부, "東國李相國集 全集 권4" (1990), 민족문화추진회
  8. 민족문화추진회 편집부, "西陂集 권18" (1995), 민족문화추진회
  9. 민족문화추진회 편집부, "破齋稿 권11" (2002), 민족문화추진회
  10. 李能和, "朝鮮巫俗考" (1991), 동문선
  11. 陳浦淸, "中國古代寓言史" (1996), 湖南敎育出版社
  12. 呂湘瑜, "通代古文評點選本硏究", 박사, pp.2008
  13. 康保成, "韓愈「送窮文」與驅儺、祭竈風俗", 中山大學學報, (8) (1993)
  14. 李豊茂, "『道藏』所收早期道書的瘟疫觀", 中國文哲硏究集刊, (3) (1993)
  15. 李豊茂, "行瘟與送瘟: 道敎與民衆瘟疫觀的交流和分岐", 民間信仰與中國文化國際硏討會論文集 (1994)
  16. 沈文嘉, "論唐代古文運動對文賦體式形成的影響", 聊城大學學報, (1) (2011)
  17. 金美羅, "‘送窮’與 ‘送痘神’: 中韓兩國民間風俗小考", 韓國硏究論叢, 37(1) (2019)
  18. 이승수, "祭文 형식의 미학적 가능성", 한국사상과, 17 (2002)
  19. 이은영, "哀祭文의 특징과 변천과정", 동방한문학, (31), pp.257~297 (2006), 동방한문학회
  20. 강찬수, "中國刻本 《古文眞寶》에 대한 연구-紹興圖書館 所藏 《魁本大字諸儒箋解古文眞寶》 를 중심으로-", 중국문학연구, (32), pp.73~94 (2006), 한국중문학회
  21. 고대원, "숙종의 痘瘡에 관한 『承政院日記』의 醫案 연구", 한국의사학회지, 25(1), pp.43~51 (2012), 한국의사학회[DOI]
  22. 김미라, "唐宋 寓言의 變化 樣相 小考 ― 古文家들의 寓言 創作을 中心으로", 중국소설논총, (35), pp.35~63 (2011), 한국중국소설학회[DOI]
  23. 정인숙, "<서신전송가(西神餞送歌)>에 나타난 두신(痘神) 전송(餞送) 의례와 그 의미", 한국시가연구, 38, pp.285~312 (2015), 한국시가학회[DOI]
  24. 고광민, "韓愈 <送窮文>의 후대 수용 연구― <送窮文> 모방작을 중심으로", 중국어문학논집, (109), pp.365~384 (2018), 중국어문학연구회

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (12건)