『신문학사』와 『한국 문학사』의 동일성 소고 - 문학사 방법론과 언어 의식을 중심으로 -

Abstract

This paper aims at investigating common features of Im Hwa's text of the history of literature and Kim Yoon-shik․Kim Hyun's those. Their texts of the history of literature seem to be on the basis of very different historical views and the method of historical description. Kim Yoon-shik․Kim Hyun had regarded Im Hwa's text as 'an argument of transplanted culture'. So They thought that Their text will have to overcome that by illustrating the history of literature as 'an argument of immanent development'. But they misinterpreted Im Hwa's text. The methodology of Kim Yoon-shik․Kim Hyun's text was based on materialism, which regarded a language as a characteristic class. Therefor, a struggle of classes becomes a struggle of a language. The suppressed class breaks up the ruling class's unrealistic idealism with a language as a characteristic class. Their philosophical background is the so-called The Master-Slave dialectic of Hegelian dialectic. The methodology of Im Hwa's text is identical with Kim Yoon-shik․Kim Hyun's that. But Im, Wha had vested the history of Korean literature with realism as literary tradition. The reason which realism was able to be become literary tradition dues to Korean what has a mode to have relation to realism in the heart of it.