기교파라는 ‘권력’과 기교파이지 않을 ‘권리’ - 조선어 구어의 ‘노래’를 찾아가는 임화의 근대시 기획에 대하여

Abstract

‘Technists’ imply discontinuity and non-homogeneity both terminologically and historically; it is an another strategy of enonciation. If the ‘technique’ is substituted to the ‘technology,’ the value-neutral word, this ‘technology’s searching process is the one of modern poetry’s style for the melodic execution of Chosuneo spoken language. Lim hwa, who had criticized Modernism and Technicalism as the leading theorist of KAPF, could reorganize the history of modern poetry in terms of objectivity and reflection beyond dogmatic prejudice. On the history of it, the authority as Technists must be changed to the right of Technicians. Writing the history of literature, he approached the music of Chosuneo spoken language as poem’s describing problem; it shows the aspect of poet-technician deviant of self-contradiction. ‘How could you write the poem so well with Chosuneo spoken language?’ When it comes to this problem, Kim kirim, Park yongchul, even Lim hwa had not been in outside the border of Technicalism. Lim hwa had had big interest in sense problem of Chosuneo. Lim hwa’s active assessment to the new generation of end of Japanese imperialism(O Janghwan, Kim kwangkyun, Seo jungju, Yoon konkang etc.) also has relationship with the language(technology)’s problem; this rising poets’ role model were older ones, who had realized a sense of beauty of everyday words and natural Chosuneo so excellently. If Chosuneo spoken language’s melodical execution and succession take place in modern poetry’s syntactic plan, rising poets also were located in the structure of the plan. In this viewpoint, relationship between Kim uk, Kim kirim, and Lim hwa makes the discussion of the argument of Technists’ authority meaningless. Just the noble plan of modern poetry as the completion of Chosuneo poem could replace the role of this ‘authority’.