본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

전쟁 소재 역사소설에서의 만남과 이산의 주체와 타자 - 「최척전」·「김영철전」·「강로전」을 중심으로 -

The Subject and Others of Dispersion and Meeting Again in a War Historical Novel - Focused on ChoiCheok-Jeon(崔陟傳)·KimYoungCheol-Jeon(金英哲傳)·GangRo-Jeon(姜虜傳) -

0

조회

0

다운로드

12

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류한국어와문학

초록

This study aims at defining peculiarity of a war historical-classic novel eg. ChoiCheok-Jeon(崔陟傳)】KimYoungCheol-Jeon(金英哲傳)】GangRo-Jeon(姜虜傳). Most of all, war historical novel is one of genres not only to show clearly the matter that the subject(主體) is influenced by others(他者) like a war(eg. Japanese Invasion of Korea in 1592) or an irresistable force, but also to clear most definitely a distance between the subject and others. It is notable that others take an active hand to form the subject in these works. Here the subject means heroes or writer or contemporary ideal, a sense of values of those days etc. The other side, others means other things surrounding the subject. Hero and his family in above three war historical works experience to get scattered each other by war, and manage to meet again contingently. In this case, their dispersion and meeting again happen accidently on account of influence of numerous others(irresistable force, fortune, god's helping etc.) From the point of Choseon, it is easy for Japan or even China(which built by barbarian nation) to be recognized by others. But, above three works tell us that true identity means 'attitude or thinking which is able to accept the difference of others'. Therefore, basic perspective for dispersion and meeting again of hero as the subject in war historical novels is about how broad-minded mutual relation between the subject and others works. That is, one of topic of three war historical novels is related to love for humanity of a East Asian countries without any discrimination of nation. Three war historical novels are worthy of setting high value from a point of view that not nation but an ordinary person is created as the subject, and writer actually catches the process(=reality) of getting personal identity by others. Historical truth from a war historical novel is ultimately connected that becoming the subject due to others and self-rationality are able to descript through the relationship between dispersion and meeting again with open narrative structure.

Abstract

This study aims at defining peculiarity of a war historical-classic novel eg. ChoiCheok-Jeon(崔陟傳)】KimYoungCheol-Jeon(金英哲傳)】GangRo-Jeon(姜虜傳). Most of all, war historical novel is one of genres not only to show clearly the matter that the subject(主體) is influenced by others(他者) like a war(eg. Japanese Invasion of Korea in 1592) or an irresistable force, but also to clear most definitely a distance between the subject and others. It is notable that others take an active hand to form the subject in these works. Here the subject means heroes or writer or contemporary ideal, a sense of values of those days etc. The other side, others means other things surrounding the subject. Hero and his family in above three war historical works experience to get scattered each other by war, and manage to meet again contingently. In this case, their dispersion and meeting again happen accidently on account of influence of numerous others(irresistable force, fortune, god's helping etc.) From the point of Choseon, it is easy for Japan or even China(which built by barbarian nation) to be recognized by others. But, above three works tell us that true identity means 'attitude or thinking which is able to accept the difference of others'. Therefore, basic perspective for dispersion and meeting again of hero as the subject in war historical novels is about how broad-minded mutual relation between the subject and others works. That is, one of topic of three war historical novels is related to love for humanity of a East Asian countries without any discrimination of nation. Three war historical novels are worthy of setting high value from a point of view that not nation but an ordinary person is created as the subject, and writer actually catches the process(=reality) of getting personal identity by others. Historical truth from a war historical novel is ultimately connected that becoming the subject due to others and self-rationality are able to descript through the relationship between dispersion and meeting again with open narrative structure.

참고문헌 (26)

  1. 강동엽, "<최척전>에 나타난 임진왜란과 동아시아 in : 동아시아 비교문학의 전망" (2003), 동국대출판부
  2. 강신주, "莊子:타자와의 소통과 주체의 변형" (2003), 태학사
  3. 권혁래, "전란 중 민생의 포착 : <최척적> 유형", 조선후기 역사소설의 성격 (2000), 박이정
  4. 권혁래, "나손본 <김철전>의 史實性과 여성적 시각의 변모", 고전문학연구, 15 (2004), 한국고소설학회
  5. 권혁래, "<김영철전>의 작가와 작가의식", 고소설연구, 22 (2006), 한국고소설학회
  6. 김대현, "조선시대 소설사 연구" (1996), 국학자료원
  7. 김장동, "조선조 역사소설연구" (1986), 이우출판사
  8. "님쟝군젼, 경판 27장본", 국립도서관 소장본
  9. 민영대, "조위한의 삶과 문학" (2000), 국학자료원
  10. 박희병, "한국 고전소설 작품론" (1990), 집문당
  11. 박희병, "17세기 동아시아 전란과 민중의 삶-<김영철전>의 분석", 한국 근대문학사의 쟁점 (1990), 창작과 비평사
  12. 박희병, "조선후기 전의 소설적 성향 연구" (1993), 성대 대동문화연구원
  13. 박희병, "17세기 초의 崇明排胡論과 부정적 소설주인공의 등장-<姜虜傳>에 대한 고찰", 한국고전소설과 서사문학(上) (1998), 집문당
  14. 박희병, "‘병신’에의 視線-前近代 텍스트에서의-", 고전문학연구, 24, pp.11~361 (2003), 한국고전문학회
  15. 朴熙秉 標點, "韓國漢文小說 交合句解" (2005), 소명출판
  16. 박희병, "전란의 소용돌이 속에서" (2007), 돌베개
  17. 서동욱, "차이와 타자" (2000), 문학과지성사
  18. 소재영, "동아시아문학 속에서의 한국 한문소설 연구", 동아시아문학 속에서의 한국 한문소설 연구 (2002), 고려대 민족문화연구원
  19. 송하준, "조선후기 역사소설의 변모양상과 주제의식", 박사, pp.2004
  20. 양승민, "<김영철전(金英哲傳)>의 형상화 방식과 그 작가의식", 국어국문학, 138(138), pp.277~304 (2004), 국어국문학회
  21. 윤채근, "차이와 세계:서정과 서사의 존재론" (2000), 월인
  22. 정출헌, "초기 한문소설에서의 현실주의 논의와 그 전망: 15세기 『금오신화』에서 18세기초 <김영철전>까지", 고전소설사의 구도와 시각 (1999), 소명출판
  23. 정환국, "16~17세기 동아시아 전란과 애정전기", 민족문학사연구, 15 (1999), 민족문학사연구소
  24. 정환국, "17세기 實記類와 小說의 거리 -전후 소설사의 흐름과 관련하여", 漢文學報, 7(1), pp.101~128 (2002), 우리한문학회
  25. 조동일, "한국문학통사 3 (제4판)" (2004), 지식산업사
  26. 현진건, "역사소설 문제" (1939), 문장

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (7건)