金昌協의 산문 批評을 통해 본 글쓰기 방법론 - ‘주제 잡기’와 ‘단락 구성’의 문제
The Study of writing method perceived through Kim, Chang-hyup(金昌協)'s prose criticism
0
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This essay is to review Kim, Chang-hyup(金昌協)'s prose criticism, and through that, to devise some specific writing guidelines which is useful to today's composition curriculum. Kim, Chang-hyup(金昌協), as a distinguished scholar and a good writer in 17th Joseon Dynasty, criticized an imitative writing custom called Yongsa(用事), and advanced an alternative methods considering prose writing characteristics. The Yongsa(用事) is a method of conventional composition that quotes or modifies former text in expressions level, for using it, the common writers in the Joseon Dynasty must memorize a great many phrase and sentence in various classics. Kim, Chang-hyup(金昌協) thought that the writing based on Yongsa(用事) made a lot of mistake when quote former classical text, and had been attended by evil effects of imitation. So he roundly criticized the imitative writing custom and raised a writing methods which is suitable for the prose itself. He suggested that the prose writer had to learn the method on ‘fixing a central themes’ and ‘arranging paragraphs’, not imitating the expression of it from a great work, especially the Sagi(史記) which had been become a canon in the history of prose writing. By analyzing his literary criticism about several classical prose work writtin by Kim, Chang-hyup(金昌協), I set before each five detailed guidelines on ‘fixing a subject’ and ‘composing paragraphs’ at this essay, and had in place an available guidelines nowaday which is applying the classic literary criticism at the same time.
Abstract
This essay is to review Kim, Chang-hyup(金昌協)'s prose criticism, and through that, to devise some specific writing guidelines which is useful to today's composition curriculum. Kim, Chang-hyup(金昌協), as a distinguished scholar and a good writer in 17th Joseon Dynasty, criticized an imitative writing custom called Yongsa(用事), and advanced an alternative methods considering prose writing characteristics. The Yongsa(用事) is a method of conventional composition that quotes or modifies former text in expressions level, for using it, the common writers in the Joseon Dynasty must memorize a great many phrase and sentence in various classics. Kim, Chang-hyup(金昌協) thought that the writing based on Yongsa(用事) made a lot of mistake when quote former classical text, and had been attended by evil effects of imitation. So he roundly criticized the imitative writing custom and raised a writing methods which is suitable for the prose itself. He suggested that the prose writer had to learn the method on ‘fixing a central themes’ and ‘arranging paragraphs’, not imitating the expression of it from a great work, especially the Sagi(史記) which had been become a canon in the history of prose writing. By analyzing his literary criticism about several classical prose work writtin by Kim, Chang-hyup(金昌協), I set before each five detailed guidelines on ‘fixing a subject’ and ‘composing paragraphs’ at this essay, and had in place an available guidelines nowaday which is applying the classic literary criticism at the same time.
참고문헌 (32)
- 金昌協, "農巖集", 민족문화추진회
- 강명관, "농암잡지평석" (2007), 소명
- 강혜선, "金昌協 古文 硏究", 석사, pp.1990
- 강혜선, "조선후기 小品文과 글쓰기 교육", 작문연구, (5), pp.43~74 (2007), 한국작문학회
- 김광년, "息庵 金錫胄 散文 硏究", 석사, pp.2003
- 김성룡, "典範 학습과 중세의 문학교육", 문학교육학, (창간) (1997)
- 김영진, "朝鮮後期의 明淸小品 수용과 小品文의 전개양상", 박사, pp.2003
- 김철범, "한문고전의 글쓰기 이론과 그 현재적 의미", 작문연구, (1), pp.65~110 (2005), 한국작문학회
- 박경남, "金昌協의 비판을 통해 본 王世貞 散文의 진면목-商販 碑誌文을 중심으로", 2009년도 한국한문학회 동계 학술대회 발표문 (2009)
- 박영목, "作文 硏究의 動向과 課題", 작문연구, (1), pp.9~38 (2005), 한국작문학회
- 배수찬, "근대적 글쓰기의 형성과정 연구" (2008), 소명
- 배수찬(裵秀燦), "쓰기 교육의 기원과 발달에 대한 연구-‘재현(再現)’과 ‘표현(表現)’의 발생을 중심으로-", 고전문학과 교육, (16), pp.207~236 (2008), 한국고전문학교육학회
- 배수찬, "국어교육의 근대적 전환에 대한 연구 서설", 고전문학과 교육, (9), pp.5~28 (2005), 한국고전문학교육학회
- 설흔, "연암에게 글쓰기를 배우다" (2007), 예담
- 송혁기, "金昌協 文學論의 硏究", 석사, pp.1996
- 송혁기, "김창협 비평의 산문사적 의의: ‘法’의 산문론을 중심으로", 한국문학연구, 5 (2004)
- 송혁기, "조선후기 한문산문의 이론과 비평" (2006), 월인
- 심경호, "한문산문 수사법과 현대적 글쓰기", 작문연구, (5), pp.9~42 (2007), 한국작문학회
- 염은열, "상소문의 글쓰기 전략 연구: ‘諫打圍疏’를 중심으로", 국어교육연구, 3 (1996)
- 유동재, "？文訣？의 創作論과 그 文論史的 意義", 한국한문학연구, (38), pp.299~332 (2006), 한국한문학회
- 이지호, "燕巖 朴趾源의 글쓰기 方法論 硏究: ≪熱河日記≫의 대상해석을 중심으로", 박사, pp.1997
- 정경훈, "農巖 金昌協의 古文硏究:碑誌文을 中心으로", 석사, pp.1999
- 정우봉, "朝鮮後期 散文理論의 展開와 그 性格(1)-16세기 말-17세기 초 중반을 중심으로", 한국문학연구, (창간) (2000)
- 정우봉, "『？橋藝學錄』의 散文修辭學 硏究", 한국한문학연구, (32), pp.59~86 (2003), 한국한문학회
- 정우봉, "漢文修辭學 연구의 한 방법-主客法의 이론과 그 활용을 중심으로-", 어문논집, (49), pp.62~84 (2004), 민족어문학회
- 조종업, "농암시론연구. in: 민태식박사 고희기념 유교학논총" (1972)
- 조희정, "사회적 문해력으로서의 글쓰기 교육 연구: 조선 세종조 과거 시험을 중심으로", 박사, pp.2002
- 채환종, "農巖 金昌協 文學硏究", 박사, pp.1994
- 최귀묵, "金時習 글쓰기 방법의 사상적 근거 연구", 박사, pp.1997
- 최귀묵, "김시습의 사상과 글쓰기" (2001), 소명
- 하지영, "擬古·創新 논리와 표절 의미의 변모 양상: 前後七子의 의고론을 중심으로. in: 표절: 인문학적 성찰" (2007), 집문당
- 趙友林, "≪春秋≫學中的‘屬辭比事’", 聊城大學學報, 1 (2008)