본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Should the Industrial Revolution Be the Landmark of “the Modern”? ―Three Approaches and a Critical Reconceptualization of Early Modern Global History―

1

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류역사학

초록

The twentieth-century historiography of early modern global history has been dominated by a narrative privileging economic causes for the rise of capitalism and the genesis of the Industrial Revolution. Yet recent approaches in global history have produced a more nuanced vision of how to understand global connections in the early modern era without falling into Eurocentrism or the East-West binary. This essay reviews three important conceptualizations of the early modern period proposed during the late twentieth and early twenty-first centuries by Immanuel Wallerstein, Jack Goldstone, and Christopher Bayly. Wallerstein’s “world-system” proposes a Marxian model that emphasizes the genesis of capitalism in the Euro-American division of labor formed in the sixteenth century. Through the concept of “efflorescences,” Goldstone refutes conventional narratives of a linear progression from the early modern to the modern era, and argues that the properties of the modern world originated not in Europe, but in Britain. Finally, Bayly conceptualizes three stages of globalization underlining transcontinental concurrences in political, social, and cultural spheres. In appraising the strengths and weaknesses of these three models, this essay examines shifts in the focus of global history away from dogmatic economic determinism, and it considers these shifts’ implications for the formation of a more comprehensive and balanced understanding of the “early modern” period.

Abstract

The twentieth-century historiography of early modern global history has been dominated by a narrative privileging economic causes for the rise of capitalism and the genesis of the Industrial Revolution. Yet recent approaches in global history have produced a more nuanced vision of how to understand global connections in the early modern era without falling into Eurocentrism or the East-West binary. This essay reviews three important conceptualizations of the early modern period proposed during the late twentieth and early twenty-first centuries by Immanuel Wallerstein, Jack Goldstone, and Christopher Bayly. Wallerstein’s “world-system” proposes a Marxian model that emphasizes the genesis of capitalism in the Euro-American division of labor formed in the sixteenth century. Through the concept of “efflorescences,” Goldstone refutes conventional narratives of a linear progression from the early modern to the modern era, and argues that the properties of the modern world originated not in Europe, but in Britain. Finally, Bayly conceptualizes three stages of globalization underlining transcontinental concurrences in political, social, and cultural spheres. In appraising the strengths and weaknesses of these three models, this essay examines shifts in the focus of global history away from dogmatic economic determinism, and it considers these shifts’ implications for the formation of a more comprehensive and balanced understanding of the “early modern” period.

참고문헌 (13)

  1. Abu-Lughod, Janet, "Before European Hegemony: The World System A. D. 1250-1350" (1989), Oxford University Press
  2. Bayly, Christopher A, "The Birth of the Modern World, 1780-1914: Global Connections and Comparisons" (2004), Blackwell Publishing
  3. Bullet, Richard, "Hunters, Herders, and Hamburgers: the Past and Future of Human-Animal Relationships" (2005), Columbia University Press
  4. Cook, Harold J, "Matters of Exchange: Commerce, Medicine, Science in Dutch Golden Age" (2007), Yale University Press
  5. Pomeranz, Kenneth, "The Great Divergence: China, Europe and the Making of the Modern World Economy" (2000), Princeton University Press
  6. Raj, Kapil, "Relocating Modern Science: Circulation and the Construction of Knowledge in South Asia and Europe, 1650-1900" (2007), Palgrave Macmillan
  7. Smith, Pamela H, "The Body of the Artisan: Art and Experience in the Scientific Revolution" (2004), University of Chicago Press
  8. Subrahmanyam, Sanjay, "Mughals and Franks" (2002), Oxford University Press
  9. Tilly, Charles, "Big Structures, Large Processes, Huge Comparisons" (1984), Russell Sage Foundation
  10. Wallerstein, Immanuel, "The Modern World System. Vol. 1, Capitalistic Agriculture and the Origins of European World Economy in the Sixteenth Century" (1976), Academic Press
  11. Bayly, Christopher, "Archaic and ‘Modern’ Globalizations in the Eurasian and African Arena, ca. 1750-1850, In Globalization in World History", pp.45~72 (2002), Norton
  12. Flynn, Dennis O., "Cycles of Silver: Global Economic Unity through the Mid-Eighteenth Century", Journal of World History, 13(2), pp.391~427 (2002)
  13. Goldstone, Jack A, "Efflorescences and Economic Growth in World History: Rethinking of the “Rise of the West” and the Industrial Revolution", Journal of World History, 14(2), pp.323~389 (2002)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (13건)