본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

스마트안전 리빙랩 환경에서의 사용자경험 평가를 위한 방법론 개발

Development of a User Experience Evaluation Methodology for Smart Safety Living Lab

0

조회

0

다운로드

3

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류학제간연구

초록

Purpose: Smart Safety Living Lab is a Living Lab facility, constructed and operated by KITECH in Korea, to support the user experience(UX) evaluation, planning and certification of smart safety products and services. The purpose of this study is to develop a UX evaluation methodology that accommodates the characteristics of the Living Lab and smart safety products and services for a systematic and efficient UX evaluation in the Smart Safety Living Lab. Methods: A generic model of UX evaluation was first derived based on a review of related literature. Then, the generic model is revised to accommodate the characteristics of the Smart Safety Living Lab and smart safety products and services, resulting in the UX Evaluation Methodology for Smart Safety Living Lab (SSLL-UXEM). Results: The developed SSLL-UXEM consists of a structured process for UX evaluation, a guideline for conducting each step of the process, and a set of forms for recording the major evaluation results in each step. Conclusion: SSLL-UXEM can help to enhance the efficiency of the UX evaluation process and the consistency of the UX evaluation results. SSLL-UXEM is also expected to serve as a basis for UX evaluation in various living lab environments in the future.

Abstract

Purpose: Smart Safety Living Lab is a Living Lab facility, constructed and operated by KITECH in Korea, to support the user experience(UX) evaluation, planning and certification of smart safety products and services. The purpose of this study is to develop a UX evaluation methodology that accommodates the characteristics of the Living Lab and smart safety products and services for a systematic and efficient UX evaluation in the Smart Safety Living Lab. Methods: A generic model of UX evaluation was first derived based on a review of related literature. Then, the generic model is revised to accommodate the characteristics of the Smart Safety Living Lab and smart safety products and services, resulting in the UX Evaluation Methodology for Smart Safety Living Lab (SSLL-UXEM). Results: The developed SSLL-UXEM consists of a structured process for UX evaluation, a guideline for conducting each step of the process, and a set of forms for recording the major evaluation results in each step. Conclusion: SSLL-UXEM can help to enhance the efficiency of the UX evaluation process and the consistency of the UX evaluation results. SSLL-UXEM is also expected to serve as a basis for UX evaluation in various living lab environments in the future.

참고문헌 (35)

  1. Amidon, T. R., "Sensors and Gizmos and Data, Oh My : Informating Ffirefighters' Personal Protective Equipment", Communication Design Quarterly Review, 5(4), pp.15~30 (2018)
  2. 안기훈, "O2O 서비스 이용자의 동기가 기대충족과 만족을 통해 충성도에 미치는 영향", 품질경영학회지, 46(4), pp.923~938 (2018), 한국품질경영학회[DOI]
  3. 배지현, "스마트 공항 추진을 위한 기술기반셀프서비스의 사용의도에 영향을 미치는 요인에 관한 연구", 품질경영학회지, 47(4), pp.795~806 (2019), 한국품질경영학회[DOI]
  4. Bergvall-Kareborn, B., "Living Lab : An Open and Citizen-centric Approach for Iinnovation", International Journal of Innovation and Regional Development, 1(4), pp.356~370 (2009)
  5. 채혜선, "농업인에 적용 가능한 스마트 개인보호장비 개발 동향 분석", 대한인간공학회지, 36(6), pp.677~691 (2017), 대한인간공학회[DOI]
  6. Chen, H. E., "BlindNavi: A Navigation App for the Visually Iimpaired Smartphone User", Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference Extended Abstracts on Hhuman Factors in Computing Systems, pp.19~24 (2015)
  7. Cooper, R. G, "Perspective : The Stage‐gate® idea‐to‐launch process—Update, What's New, and Nexgen Systems", Journal of Product Innovation Mmanagement, 25(3), pp.213~232 (2008)
  8. Desmet, P., "Designing Products with Added Emotional Value : Development and Appllcation of an Approach for Research through Design", The Design Journal, 4(1), pp.32~47 (2001)
  9. Dong, Y., "Research on UX Ealuation Method of Design Concept under Multi-modal Experience Scenario in the Earlier Design Stages", International Journal on Interactive Design and Manufacturing, 12(2), pp.505~515 (2018)
  10. "European Network of Living Labs" (2021)[URL]
  11. Hartson, R., "The UX Book: Process and Guidelines for Ensuring a Quality User Experience" (2012), Elsevier
  12. Hassenzahl, M., "User Experience-A Research Agenda", Behaviour & Iinformation Technology, 25(2), pp.91~97 (2006)
  13. "ISO 9241–210: 2019 (en) Ergonomics of Human‐system Interaction—Part 210: Human‐centred Design for Interactive Systems" (2019)[URL]
  14. Jakobi, T., "The Catch (es) with Smart Home: Experiences of a Living Lab Field Study", Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp.1620~1633 (2017)
  15. Jang, R., "Improving Communication in General Aviation through the Use of Noise Cancelling Headphones", Safety Science, 62, pp.499~504 (2014)
  16. Jaspers, M. W, "A Comparison of Usability Methods for Testing Interactive Health Technologies : Methodological Aspects and Empirical Evidence", International Journal of Medical Informatics, 78(5), pp.340~353 (2009)
  17. 정기백, "서비스 종업원의 진정성, 소비자의 감성지능, 레포 그리고 고객충성도 : 조절된 매개모형", 품질경영학회지, 48(3), pp.361~379 (2020), 한국품질경영학회[DOI]
  18. Kaasinen, E., "Defining User Experience Goals to Guide the Design of Industrial Systems", Behaviour & Information Technology, 34(10), pp.976~991 (2015)
  19. Kim, H., "How User Experience Changes Over Time : A Case Study of Social Nnetwork Services", Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing & Service Industries, 25(6), pp.659~673 (2015)
  20. Kim, M., "Establishment and Application of Living Lab, Industrial Innovation Platform", IE Magazine, 27(2), pp.38~45 (2020)
  21. Laugwitz, B., "Construction and Evaluation of a User Experience Questionnaire", Symposium of the Austrian HCI and Usability Engineering Group, pp.63~76 (2008)
  22. Leminen, S., "Living Labs as Open-Innovation Networks", Technology Innovation Management Review, 2(9), pp.6~11 (2012)
  23. Nascimento, I., "Userbility: A Technique for the Evaluation of User Experience and Usability on Mobile Aapplications", International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction, pp.372~383 (2016)
  24. Nawaz, A., "Assessing Seniors' User Experience(UX)of Exergames for Balance Training", Proceedings of the 8th Nordic Conference on Human-computer Interaction: Fun, Fast, Foundational, pp.578~587 (2014)
  25. "CITYLAB Deliverable 3.1. Practical Guidelines for Establishing and Running a Ccity Logistics Living Laboratory" (2015)[URL]
  26. Park, J., "Development of a Web-based User Experience Evaluation Ssystem for Hhome Aappliances", International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 67, pp.216~228 (2018)
  27. Parker, R., "Measuring Wildland Fire Fighter Performance with Wearable Technology", Applied Ergonomics, 59, pp.34~44 (2017)
  28. Rajeshkumar, S., "Taxonomies of User Experience (UX) Evaluation Methods", 2013 International Conference on Research and Innovation in Information Systems, pp.533~538 (2013)
  29. Schrepp, M., "Experience Questionnaire Handbook. All You Need to Know to Apply the UEQ Successfully in Your Project", ~ (2015)
  30. Seong, J., "Current Status of Korean Living Labs and Its Development Plan", Sci Technol Policy Institute, 9, pp.1~194 (2017)
  31. Ståhlbröst, A., "The Living Lab Methodology Handbook", Social Informatics at Luleå University of Technology and CDT–Centre for Distance-spanning Technology, ~ (2012)
  32. Turunen, M., "SUXES-user Experience Evaluation Method for Spoken and Multimodal Interaction", Tenth Annual Conference of the International Speech Communication Association (2009)
  33. Vaziri, D. D., "Exploring User Experience and Technology Acceptance for a Fall Prevention System : Results from a Randomized Clinical Trial and a Living Lab", European Review of Aging and Physical Activity, 13(1), pp.6~ (2016)
  34. Winckler, M., "Identification of UX Dimensions for Incident Reporting Systems with Mobile Applications in Urban Contexts: a Longitudinal Study", Cognition, Technology & Work, 18(4), pp.673~694 (2016)
  35. Wu, Y. H., "Acceptance of an Assistive Robot in Older Adults : a Mixed-method Sstudy of Hhuman–robot Iinteraction Over a 1-month Priod in the Living Lab Setting", Clinical Interventions in Aging, 9, pp.801~ (2014)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (7건)