본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

전간기 영국의 자동차산업과 포디즘

British Motor Industry and Fordism between the Two World Wars

0

조회

0

다운로드

4

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류역사학

초록

영국 자동차산업은 양차대전 사이에 지속적으로 성장했지만, 1960년대 이래 주요 자동차회사가 외국계 기업에 흡수 합병되면서 몰락했다. 전통적 해석에 따르면, 이 분야의 기업가들은 당시 새로운 생산원리인 과학적 관리와 포디즘을 제대로 수용하지 못했으며 그 결과 전후에 파국을 맞았다는 것이다. 그러나 수정주의 역사가들은 전간기 영국 경제의 특수성과 새로운 생산방식 수용문제를 연결 지어 해석한다. 영국 기업가들은 미국식 포디즘을 변용해, 노동자에 대한 직접 통제 대신에 성과급체제에 기반을 두고 작업속도를 결정하는 영국 특유의 대량생산방식을 도입했다. 이는 조직노동자들의 저항과 협소한 국내 자동차시장이라는 조건들에서 비롯된 것이었다. 이에 따라 반자동 및 자동기계와 숙련노동이 공존하는 특이한 생산과정이 정착되었다. 이러한 제도의 정착 때문에 1960년대 번영의 시대에 영국 자동차산업은 세계시장에서 급증하는 자동차 수요에 대처할 수 없었다.

Abstract

The British motor industry continued to be prosperous between the two world wars. At that time Britain was the second largest car producer in the world. But after the 1960s its major motor companies were merged into foreign companies. According to the traditional interpretation, the collapse of the industry stemmed from the fact that the motor industrialists had hesitated to introduce the principle of scientific management and Fordism to the production processes of cars, and as a result the industry lost its international competitive power and fell into catastrophe after World War II. But recently the revisionists are trying to connect the transformation of Fordism into the new British system with the particular British labour relations and market situation. The British motor industrialists were also interested in Fordism and scientific management. According to revisionist studies, they tried to introduce to their production processes the transformed Ford system more suitable to the British conditions. There were two conditions that compelled the motor industrialists to transform the Ford system in Britain. One was the long tradition of labour movements in the workshops and factories, and the other the narrowness of the motor market in Britain. Under these conditions, British industrialists could not but seek to create the mass-production system on the basis of piece-rate system. For it to succeed, it required peaceful relations with the skilled labourers and craftsmen. In fact, the introduction of scientific management and Fordism could be selected by the industrialists for the short term. But in reality, the relations between capital and labour were more important. While the American industrialists could recruit factory workers from a large pool of immigrants for the use of the Ford system, the British industrialists were facing an almost impossible task in trying to introduce it to their factories without any workers’ resistance. The British mass-production system was also the result of its peculiar condition of the motor market. In Britain the demand for motor cars was very limited because of its small population in comparison with that of America. Futhermore, it was impossible for the British motor industrialists to focus on the mass-production of single model cars under the social situation influenced by their hierarchical tradition. So, they tried to develop and sell the more expensive car models, and to introduce the assembly line only partly to their factories. In short, the British motor industry showed a characteristic that allowed skilled labour and semi-automachinery to co-exist between the two world wars.

참고문헌 (30)

  1. A. D. Chandler, "Scale and Scope: The Dynamics of Industrial Capitalism" (1990), Harvard University Press
  2. 송충기, "알프레드 챈들러. in: 역사가들: E. H. 카에서 하워드 진까지" (2010), 역사비평사
  3. 양동휴, "규모와 범위의 경제: 알프레드 챈들러의 경영관", 경제논집, 30(4) (1991)
  4. 이내주, "영국 과학기술교육과 산업 발전" (2009), 한울
  5. 이영석, "전쟁, 공황, 영국 노동계급의 경험", 전남사학, 11 (1997)
  6. A. J. Scott, "Flexible Production Systems and Regional Development", International Review of Urban and Regional Research, 12(2) (1988)
  7. C. Barnett, "The Collapse of British Power" (1972)
  8. R. R. Locke, "The End of the Practical Man: Entrepreneurship and Higher Education in Germany, France and Great Britain" (1984), JAP Press
  9. C. J. Schitz, "The Growth of Big Business in the United States and Western Europem 1850-1939" (1995), Cambridge University Press
  10. D. A. Houndshell, "From the American System to Mass Production" (1984)
  11. D. H. Aldcroft, "Economic Progress in Britain in the 1920s", Scottish Journal of Political Economy, 13 (1966)
  12. F. W. Taylor, "The Principles of Scientific Management" (2003), Routledge
  13. H. Ford, "My Life and Work" (1923), Heinemann
  14. H. Ford, "Today and Tomorrow" (1926), Heinemann
  15. H. W. Richardson, "Economic Recovery in Britain 1932-39" (1967), Weidenfeld and Nicolson
  16. J. Seabrook, "What Went Wrong?" (1978), Camelot Press
  17. L. Hannah, "The Rise of the Corporate Economy, 2nd ed" (1983), Methuen
  18. P. K. O'Brien, "Britain’s Economy Between the Wars: A Survey of a Counter-Revolution in Economic History", Past and Present, 115 (1987)
  19. P. L. Payne, "Entrepreneurship and British Economic Decline, in British Culture and Economic Decline" (1990), Weidenfeld and Nicolson
  20. R. Church, "The Rise and Decline of the British Motor Industry" (1995), Cambridge University Press
  21. R. J. Morris, "William Morris, Viscount Nuffield" (1976), Europa Publications
  22. S. Constantine, "Unemployment in Britain between the Wars" (1980)
  23. S. Meyer, "The Five Dollar Day: Labor Management and Social Control in the Ford Motor Campany, 1908-21" (1981), SUNY Press
  24. S. Tolliday, "Management and Labour in Britain 1896-1939, in Between Fordism and Flexibility, the International Motor Industry and its Workers" (1992), Berg
  25. S. Tolliday, "Steel and Rationalization Policies 1918-1950, in The Decline of the British Economy" (1986), Oxford University Press
  26. T. Claydon, "Trade Unions, Employers and Industrial Relations in the British Motor Industry, 1919-45", Business History, 29(2) (1987)
  27. W. A. Lewchuck, "The Motor Vehicle Industry, in The Decline of the British Economy" (1986), Oxford University Press
  28. W. A. Lewchuck, "The Origin of Fordism and Alternative Strategies: Britain and the United States, 1880-1930, in Between Fordism and Flexibility, the International Motor Industry and its Workers" (1985), Oxford University Press
  29. W. A. Lewchuck, "The Role of the British Government in the spread of Scientific Management and Fordism in the Interwar Years", Journal of Economic Histotry, 44(2) (1984)
  30. W. Morris, "Policies that have built the Morris Business", Journal of Industrial Economics, 1(2) (1954)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (9건)