성평등의 헌법적 기원: 대만의 제헌헌법과 여성정치대표성
Do Constitution Rights Promote Gender Equality? Evidence from Taiwan
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
헌법은 성평등의 실현에 어떠한 방식으로 작동하는가? 헌법에서의 성평등 조항은 상징적인 의미에 머무르는가, 아니면 실질적 효력을 지니는가? 입헌 민주주의에서 헌법은 현대정치의 지도 원칙으로 핵심적인 역할을 담당하지만, 성평등의 실현에 있어서 헌법의 역할에 대한 연구는 매우 드물게 이루어졌다. 이에 본 논문은 대만의 사례를 통해 헌법과 성평등의 상관관계를 거시적, 역사적으로 살펴보고자 한다. 공화국 초기부터 다양성을 포용한 대만의 제도는 소수자의 적절한 대표성을 강조하는 조화(調和)의 틀 안에서 발전해왔으며, 대만 헌법에 배태된 “동등 대표(equal representation)”원칙은 여성의 개인적 권리와 정치적 대표성, 나아가 성적자기결정권의 실현에 결정적인 역할을 하였다. 헌법의 동등 대표성 원칙은 입법부 뿐 아니라 행정부와 사법부 전반에 걸쳐 성평등적 제도 확립에 기여하였다. 이러한 주장을 뒷받침하기 위해 본 논문에서는 대만의 제헌 헌법과 관련한 역사적 분석을 시도하는 한편, 후일 정부가 다양한 정치 기관에서 성평등 관행을 구현하는데 헌법이 어떠한 영향을 미쳤는지를 분석한다. 이를 통해 본 연구는 여성정치대표성에 대한 현재 담론의 범위를 확장하고. 입헌 민주주의의 역사적 맥락과 성평등적 결과를 연결지음으로써 성평등 실현에 있어 민주주의 원칙의 중요성을 강조한다.
Abstract
How do constitutions work to realize gender equality? Are gender equality provisions in constitutions merely symbolic or do they have practical effects? In constitutional democracies, constitutions play a key role as guiding principles for modern politics, but the role of constitutions in the realization of gender equality has been very rarely studied. This paper aims to examine the relationship between constitutions and gender equality from a macro and historical perspective through the case of Taiwan. Taiwan’s institutions, which have embraced diversity since the early days of the republic, have developed within a framework of harmony that emphasizes the adequate representation of minorities, and the principle of “equal representation” embodied in the Taiwan Constitution has played a crucial role in the realization of women’s political representation and, by extension, their right to sexual self-determination. To support this claim, this paper provides a historical analysis of Taiwan’s founding constitution and analyzes how it has influenced subsequent governments to implement gender equality practices in various political institutions. By linking the historical context of constitutional democracy with gender-equitable outcomes, this study reaffirms the importance of democratic principles in realizing gender equality.
참고문헌 (49)
- 고민희, "누가 여성할당제를 반대하는가? 능력주의와 여성할당제 인식의 변화, 2010-2024", 현대정치연구, 17(2), pp.148~194 (2024)
- 김민정, "EU 의 성평등정책이 회원국의 국내정책에 미친 영향: 프랑스 동수를위한 헌법개정을 중심으로", 21 세기정치학회보, 14(1), pp.151~175 (2004)
- 석인선, "헌법상 성평등 개념의 한계와 재정립", 법학논집, 16(3), pp.1~30 (2012)
- 신옥주, "헌법상 남녀동권규정 도입의 필요성에 관한 비교법적 고찰", 공법학연구, 10(2), pp.55~80 (2009)
- 안도경, "1948년 헌법을 만들다: 제헌국회20일의 현장" (2023), 포럼
- 양현아, "호주제도 헌법불합치 결정에 나타난 성차별 판단의 논증 : ‘전통’과 식민지성의 관련성 속에서", 경제와사회, pp.215~255 (2010)
- 이석민, "헌법국가란 무엇인가-독일적 개념의 연원과 한국적 수용가능성", 법학논고, (67), pp.31~73 (2019)
- 이준일, "평등심사의 구조와 단계 – 성차별 관련 헌법재판소 결정에 대한 분석을 중심으로", 헌법학연구, 29(4), pp.93~130 (2023)
- "일본의 기본적 인권의 사인간효력" (2017), 이혜진[URL]
- 조병식, "1947년 ｢중화민국헌법｣과 1954년 ｢중화인민공화국헌법｣의 비교 연구", 동북아법연구, 15(1), pp.1~32 (2021)
- Borchorst, Anette, "Woman-friendly Policies and State Feminism : Theorizing Scandinavian Gender Equality", Feminist Theory, 9(2), pp.207~224 (2008)
- Cassola, Adèle, "Where Do Women Stand? New Evidence on the Presence and Absence of Gender Equality in the World’s Constitutions", Politics & Gender, 10(2), pp.200~235 (2014)
- Chamberlain, Joseph P., "Structure of China’s Constitution", Far Eastern Survey, 16(9), pp.100~105 (1947)
- Chang, Wen-Chen, "Public Interest Litigation in Asia", pp.142~166 (2010), Routledge
- Chiao, C. K., "New Developments in Employment Discrimination Law", pp.175~231 (2008), The Japan Institute for Labour Policy
- Chilton, Adam, "The Effect of Constitutional Gender Equality Clauses", The Journal of Legal Studies, 51(2), pp.329~370 (2022)
- Chilton, Adam, "Small-c Constitutional Rights", International Journal of Constitutional Law, 20(1), pp.141~176 (2022)
- Chilton, Adam, "Research Handbook on the Politics of Constitutional Law", pp.432~452 (2023), Edward Elgar Publishing
- "Judicial Yuan Interpretation No. 748" (2017)[URL]
- "Gender At A Glance in R.O.C. Executive Yuan" (2023)[URL]
- Fan, Yun, "Activists in a Changing Political Environment: A Microfoundational Study of Social Movements in Taiwan’s Democratic Transition, 1980s-1990s", Doctor, pp.2000
- Friedman Sarah H., "Same-sex Marriage Legalization and the Stigmas of LGBT Co-parenting in Taiwan", Law & Social Inquiry, 48(2), pp.660~688 (2023)
- Ginsburg, Tom, "The Emergence of Constitutional Review in Korea and Taiwan", Law & Social Inquiry, 27(4), pp.763~799 (2002)
- Ginsburg, Tom, "Constitutionalism: East Asian Antecedents", Chicago-Kent Law Review, pp.11~33 (2012)
- "Gender Equality Policy Guidelines" (2011)[URL]
- Huang, Chang-Ling, "Gender Quotas in Taiwan : The Impact of Global Diffusion", Politics & Gender, 11(1), pp.207~217 (2015)
- Huang, Chang-Ling, "Reserved for Whom? The Electoral Impact of Gender Quotas in Taiwan", Pacific Affairs, 89, pp.325~343 (2016)
- Huntington, Samuel P., "The Third Wave (Vol. 199, No. 1)" (1991), University of Oklahoma Press
- Hwang, Shu-ling, "Social Capital and Feminist power : Promoting Gender Mainstreaming in Taiwan", International Feminist Journal of Politics, 21(5), pp.724~745 (2019)
- "Taiwan Likely to Get More Female Politicians from Quota System" (2022)[URL]
- Jung, Minwoo, "Imagining Sovereign Futures : the Marriage Equality Movement in Taiwan", Social Movement Studies, 23(4), pp.462~478 (2021)
- Kantola, Johanna, "From State Feminism to Market Feminism?", International Political Science Review, 33(4), pp.382~400 (2012)
- Kim, Sungmoon, "From Remonstrance to Impeachment : A Curious Case of ‘Confucian Constitutionalism’ in South Korea", Law & Social Inquiry, 44(3), pp.586~616 (2019)
- Lambert, Priscilla A., "A Politics of Difference versus a Politics of Equality: Do Constitutions Matter?", Comparative Politics, 41(3), pp.337~357 (2009)
- "Wang Ju-hsuan: New Ideas into the Bureaucracy" (2010)[URL]
- Lin, Chien-Chih, "The Judicialization of Politics in Taiwan", Asian Journal of Law and Society, 3(2), pp.299~326 (2016)
- Lin, Chien-Chih, "The Constitution of Taiwan : A Contextual Analysis", International Journal of Constitutional Law, 16(2), pp.702~706 (2018)
- Lovenduski, Joni, "State Feminism and Women’s Movements", West European Politics, 31(1-2), pp.169~194 (2008)
- Mansbridge, Jane J., "Why We Lost the ERA" (2015), University of Chicago Press
- McDonagh, Eileen, "Political Citizenship and Democratization : The Gender Paradox", American Political Science Review, 96(3), pp.535~552 (2002)
- Rueschemeyer, Dietrich, "The Oxford Handbook of Contextual Political Analysis" (2006)
- Shim, Jaemin, "Mind the Gap! Comparing Gender Politics in Japan and Taiwan", GIGA Focus. German Institute of Global and Area Studies, (8) (2018)
- Suk, Julie. C., "We the Women : The Unstoppable Mothers of the Equal Rights Amendment" (2020), Simon & Schuster
- Tan, Netina, "Gender Reforms, Electoral Quotas, and Women’s Political Representation in Taiwan, South Korea, and Singapore", Pacific Affairs, 89(2), pp.309~323 (2016)
- "Gay Couples Dissatisfied with Ruling on Same-sex Marriage" (2022)[URL]
- Takeuchi, Maki, "Combining Egalitarian Working Lives with Traditional Attitudes : Gender Role Attitudes in Taiwan, Japan, and Korea", International Journal of Japanese Sociology, 25(1), pp.100~116 (2016)
- Teele, Dawn Langan, "Forging the Franchise : The Political Origins of the Women’s Vote" (2018), Princeton University Press
- Wells, Audrey, "The Political Thought of Sun Yat-sen" (2001), Palgrave Macmillan
- Williams, Susan H., "Constituting Equality: Gender Equality and Comparative Constitutional Law" (2009), Cambridge University Press