회복적 경찰활동에 대한 비판적 검토

Abstract

Police have declared “restorative police activities” and are active. The role and function of police activities as a direct institution for crime prevention overlaps much with activities based on restorative justice. But from a value perspective, is police activity harmonious with restorative justice? In practical terms, isn't it one of the investigative procedures, another typical criminal procedure? It is still controversial who should be involved in the (recoverable) process. However, the idea is that non-formality should be a ‘regular’ of restorative justice outside the formal framework of state agencies. Depending on the perspective, the idea of justice also changes. There is a difference between the proceedings of criminal justice based on the definition of retribution and the operation of procedures to seek restorative justice. There was a skepticism about one-sided, uniform, fragmented criminal justice and how much it would be possible for its members to engage in procedures that require unformity and autonomy. Naming defines the object to which it is pointed. That is, the name determines the nature of the event and the nature of the system. Therefore, we will find meaning by looking at the operation of resilient police activities and by looking at the meaning of restorative justice and the direction of restorative police activities.