Topics in Subordinate Clauses in Korean
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The Linguistic Association of Korea Journal, 16(2), 125-142. It has been observed that topic phrases in Korean are restricted in their distribution: They cannot occur in factive complements, the antecedent of conditionals, and relative clauses. Built upon Shin (1987), who noted the similarity of meaning among the topic, the antecedent of conditionals, and the relative clause, this paper develops an analysis of this restriction based on the semantic tripartite structure proposed by Diesing (1992), Partee (1995), and Hajičová et al. (1998). It is argued that the topic phrase and the three constructions all share a common semantic feature, that is, presupposition, one characteristic of which is to be raised and mapped to the restrictive clause at LF. Since each of the three constructions competes against the topic phrase for the same position, the co-occurrence restriction is derived.
Abstract
The Linguistic Association of Korea Journal, 16(2), 125-142. It has been observed that topic phrases in Korean are restricted in their distribution: They cannot occur in factive complements, the antecedent of conditionals, and relative clauses. Built upon Shin (1987), who noted the similarity of meaning among the topic, the antecedent of conditionals, and the relative clause, this paper develops an analysis of this restriction based on the semantic tripartite structure proposed by Diesing (1992), Partee (1995), and Hajičová et al. (1998). It is argued that the topic phrase and the three constructions all share a common semantic feature, that is, presupposition, one characteristic of which is to be raised and mapped to the restrictive clause at LF. Since each of the three constructions competes against the topic phrase for the same position, the co-occurrence restriction is derived.
참고문헌 (17)
- Beghelli, F, "Distributivity and negation: The syntax of each and every" (1997), Kluwer Academic
- Basilico,D, "Head position and internally headed relative clauses", Language, 72(3), pp.498~532 (1996)
- Berman,S, "On the semantics and logical form of wh-clauses", 박사, pp.1991
- Diesing, M., "Indefinites" (1992), MIT Press
- Hajicov? E., "Topic-focus articulation, tripartite structures, and semantic content" (1998), Kluwer Academic Publishers
- Haiman,J., "Conditionals are topics", Language, 54(3), pp.564~589 (1978)
- Kim,J-R, "Korean topic constructions", 박사, pp.1994
- Kiparsky, C, "Progress in linguistics: A collection of papers", pp.143~173 (1971), Mouton
- Koizumi, M., "Object agreement phrases and the split VP hypothesis", In MIT working papers in linguistics, 18, pp.99~148 (1993), MITWPL
- Kratzer,A, "Papers from the parasession on pragmatics and grammatical theory", Chicago Linguistic Society, pp.1~15 (1986)
- Kuno,S, "Subject, theme, and the speaker’s empathy: A reexamination of relativization phenomenon", pp.417~444 (1976), Academic Press
- Lambrecht,K, "Informational structure and sentence form: Topic, focus and the mental representations of discourse referents" (1994), Cambridge University Press
- Lasnik,H, "Subjects, objects, and the EPP(Objects and other subjects: Grammatical functions, functional categories, and configurationality)", pp.103~122 (2001), Kluwer Academic Press
- Partee,B, "Quantificational structures and compositionality" (1995), Kluwer Academic.
- Pinar, L. P, "Negative polarity licensing and negative concord in the romance languages. Unpublished doctoral dissertation", 박사, pp.1996
- Postal, P, "On raising: One rule of English grammar and its theoretical implications" (1974), MIT Press
- Shin, S-C, "A unifying theory of topic, conditional and relative constructions in Korean: A case for archimorpheme across syntactic categories", 박사, pp.1987