본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Ratified and Unratified Topics in Spoken Korean

0

조회

0

다운로드

9

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류언어학

초록

The Linguistic Association of Korea Journal, 16(3), 25-41. This paper investigates two different types of topics in spoken Korean: ratified and unratified topics. Following Lambrecht and Michaelis (1998), it is first noted that topics are divided into ratified and unratified topics. It is then shown that ratified and unratified topics in English and French have different formal realizations. Like English and French, Korean is also shown to have the formal distinction of ratified and unratified topics; zero pronouns and unaccented bare NPs are used for ratified topics, and nun-marked NPs and the maliya-construction are used for unratified topics. The marker -nun is thus regarded as having the function of indicating unratified topics. As a related issue, this paper addresses "contrastiveness" associated with -nun, and it is argued that the contrastiveness related to -nun is a gradient notion.

Abstract

The Linguistic Association of Korea Journal, 16(3), 25-41. This paper investigates two different types of topics in spoken Korean: ratified and unratified topics. Following Lambrecht and Michaelis (1998), it is first noted that topics are divided into ratified and unratified topics. It is then shown that ratified and unratified topics in English and French have different formal realizations. Like English and French, Korean is also shown to have the formal distinction of ratified and unratified topics; zero pronouns and unaccented bare NPs are used for ratified topics, and nun-marked NPs and the maliya-construction are used for unratified topics. The marker -nun is thus regarded as having the function of indicating unratified topics. As a related issue, this paper addresses "contrastiveness" associated with -nun, and it is argued that the contrastiveness related to -nun is a gradient notion.

참고문헌 (16)

  1. Bolinger, D, "Contrastive accent and contrastive stress", Langauge, 37, pp.83~96 (1961)
  2. Chafe, W, "Cognitive constraints on information flow.In: Coherence and grounding in discourse", pp.21~5 (1987), John Benjamins
  3. Choi, H.-W, "Optimizing structure in context: scrambling and information structure. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation. Stanford University. Stanford, CA", ~ (1996)
  4. Choi, S.-Y, "A contrastive analysis of Korean postpositions'-nun' and '-ka.'", Language Research, 20(3), pp.233~250 (1984)
  5. Gundel, J, "Shared knowledge and topicality", Journal of Pragmatics, 9(1), pp.83~107 (1985)
  6. Gundel, J, "Universals of topic-comment structure.In: Studies in syntactic typology", pp.209~239 (1988), John Benjamins
  7. Han, Jung-Hye, "Asymmetry in the interpretation of(n)un in Korean", Japanese, 1998, pp.7, 275~289[DOI]
  8. Jung, Y. C, "Discourse and recursive categorical syntax: A study of Korean particles with focus on subjects. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation. University of Washington. Seattle, WA", ~ (1990)
  9. Kim, K.-S, "Where do the contrastive and focus readings come from in Hajime Hoji (Ed.), Japanese", Korean Linguistics, 1990, pp.395~412
  10. Kuno, S, "Functional sentence perspective: A case study from Japanese and English", Linguistic Inquiry, 3, pp.269~320 (1972)
  11. Lambrecht, K, "On the status of SVO sentences in French discourse.In: Coherence and grounding in discourse", pp.217~262 (1987), John Benjamins
  12. Lambrecht, K, "Information structure and sentence form. Topic, focus, and the mental representations of discourse referents" (1994), Cambridge University Press
  13. Lambrecht, K, "When subjects behaves like objects: an analysis of S and O in sentence-focus constructions across languages", Studies in Language, 24(3), pp.611~682 (2000)
  14. Lambrecht, K, "Dislocation. In M. Haspelmath, Martin et al. (Eds.) Language Typology and Language Universals", Sprachtypologie und sprachliche Universalien, Ein inte, 2001[DOI]
  15. Lambrecht, K., "Sentence accent in information questions: default and projection", Linguistics and Philosophy, 21(5), pp.477~544 (1998)
  16. Reinhart, T, "Pragmatics and linguistics.An analysis of sentence topics", Philosophica, 27(1), pp.53~94 (1982)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (12건)