영어 주어-주어 상승구문과 주어통제구문의 코퍼스 기반 연구
0
조회
0
다운로드
3
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The purpose of this paper is to provide a corpus- based analysis of (i) the differences between the raising constructions and the corresponding non-raising constructions, and (ii) the semantic and functional differences between subject-to- subject raising constructions and subject control constructions. The following findings are discussed. First, subject-to-subject raising constructions are shown to be unmarked compared to the corresponding non-raising constructions in terms of distributional frequency. Second, while subject-to-object raising constructions are used for the topicality of raised elements, the claim does not apply to the subject-to-subject raising constructions. Third, the animacy of the subjects for control constructions was predominant, while that of raised subjects for subject-to-subject raising constructions was not. Fourth, the control subjects are more definite than the raised ones, and the raised subjects of seem are more definite than those of (be) likely. Fifth, complement clauses in raising constructions are longer than those in the control constructions. Sixth, the complement verbs in the control constructions are more eventive than those in the raising constructions.
Abstract
The purpose of this paper is to provide a corpus- based analysis of (i) the differences between the raising constructions and the corresponding non-raising constructions, and (ii) the semantic and functional differences between subject-to- subject raising constructions and subject control constructions. The following findings are discussed. First, subject-to-subject raising constructions are shown to be unmarked compared to the corresponding non-raising constructions in terms of distributional frequency. Second, while subject-to-object raising constructions are used for the topicality of raised elements, the claim does not apply to the subject-to-subject raising constructions. Third, the animacy of the subjects for control constructions was predominant, while that of raised subjects for subject-to-subject raising constructions was not. Fourth, the control subjects are more definite than the raised ones, and the raised subjects of seem are more definite than those of (be) likely. Fifth, complement clauses in raising constructions are longer than those in the control constructions. Sixth, the complement verbs in the control constructions are more eventive than those in the raising constructions.
참고문헌 (21)
- 김은일, "유생성의 문법", 현대문법연구, 20, pp.71~93 (2000)
- 김은일, "유생성(animacy)이 영한 번역에 미치는 영향", 언어과학, 16(1), pp.23~40 (2009), 한국언어과학회
- Becker, M., "Verbs on the fringe: Raising verbs as lexical hazards (IRCS tech. report #02-01)" (2002), Institute for Research on Cognitive Science
- Becker, M., "Learning verbs without arguments: The problem of raising verbs", Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 34(2), pp.173~199 (2005)
- Biber, D., "Longman grammar of spoken and written English" (1999), Longman
- Callies, M., "Easy to understand but difficult to use? Raising constructions and information packaging in the advanced learner variety, In Linking contrastive and learner corpus research", pp.201~226 (2008), Rodopi
- Chomsky, N, "Conditions on transformations, In A festschrift for Morris Halle", pp.232~286 (1973), Holt, Rinehart and Winston
- Croft, W, "Typology and universals" (1990), Cambridge University Press
- Davies, W., "The grammar of raising and control: A course in syntactic argumentation" (2004), Blackwell Publishing
- Eckman, F, "On the explanation of some typological facts about raising, In Current themes in linguistics", pp.195~214 (1977), Halsted Press
- Frajzynger, Z, "A functional theory of matrix coding", Paper Presented at the Conference on Functional Approaches to Grammar (1995)
- Grimm, S., "An empirical view on raising to subject", ZAS Papers in Linguistics, 52, pp.83~109 (2010)
- Langacker, R, "Raising and transparency", Language, 71(1), pp.1~62 (1995)
- Lasnik, H., "Complement object deletion", Linguistic Inquiry, 5, pp.535~571 (1974)
- 이한정, "To Raise or Not to Raise: A Corpus Study of Raising-to-Object in Korean", 언어, 33(4), pp.813~842 (2008), 한국언어학회
- Nissim, M, "An annotation scheme for information status in Dialogue", Proceedings of the 4th Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation, pp.1~14 (2004)
- Noel, D, "The choice between infinitives and that-clauses after believe", English Language and Linguistics, 2(1), pp.271~284 (1997)
- Perlmutter, D., "The two verbs begin, In Readings in English transformational grammar", pp.107~119 (1970), Blaisdell Publishing Company
- Rosenbaum, P, "The grammar of English predicate complement constructions" (1967), MIT Press
- Serdobolskaya, N., "Towards the typology of raising: A functional approach, In New challenges in typology: Transcending the borders and refining the distinctions", pp.269~294 (2009), Mouton de Gruyter
- Van Valin, R., "An introduction to syntax" (2001), Cambridge University Press