본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

당혹성 제품의 구매지연에 영향을 미치는 요인들: 소비자의 자기통제와 사용 주체 및 메시지 프레이밍의 조절효과를 중심으로

The Factors that Affect Purchase Deferral in Context of Purchasing Embarrassing Product: Focusing of Effect of Consumer’s Self-Control and Moderating Role of Product Usage Subject and Message Framing

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

소비자들은 다양한 사건으로 인해 당혹감을 경험할 뿐만 아니라 특정 제품을 구매하면서 항상 당혹스러운 감정을 느낄 수 있다. 이때 소비자들은 구매를 망설이거나 미룰 수 있으며 구매 경험에 대해 부정적인 태도를 형성할 수 있으므로, 마케팅 관리자들은 소비자들의 부정적 감정을 관리하고 구매를 촉진할 필요가 있다. 이에 본 연구는 당혹감을 유발하는 특정 제품, 즉 당혹성 제품의 구매지연을 심층적으로 이해하기 위해 소비자의 개인적 성향인 자기통제와 당혹성 제품의 사용 주체 간의 상호작용이 구매지연의도에 미치는 영향을 살펴보고, 자기통제와 당혹성 제품 구매의 이득/손실을 전달하는 메시지의 프레이밍 효과를 검증하였다. 분석 결과, 당혹성 제품의 사용 주체가 자신일 경우, 자기통제성향이 약한 소비자가 자기통제성향이 강한 소비자보다 구매지연의도가 높았으나 당혹성 제품의 사용 주체가 타인일 경우, 자기통제성향에 따른 구매지연의도 간 유의한 차이를 보이지 않았다. 또한 소비자의 자기통제와 메시지 프레이밍의 상호작용효과를 검증한 결과, 이득 프레이밍에 노출될 경우, 자기통제성향이 약한 소비자가 자기통제성향이 강한 소비자보다 구매지연의도가 높았으나 부정적인 최종 상태를 강조하는 손실 프레이밍에 노출될 경우, 자기통제성향이 약한 소비자와 강한 소비자의 구매지연의도 간 유의한 차이가 나타나지 않았다. 본 연구는 당혹성 제품 구매에 대한 이해를 넓히기 위해 오프라인 매장에서 소비자들의 개인적 특성 및 상황적, 환경적 요인들을 종합적으로 검토하였다. 연구의 결과를 바탕으로 당혹성 제품의 구매지연을 감소시킬 수 있는 전략을 고안하고 당혹성 제품을 판매하는 기업에게 실무적 지침을 제공할 수 있다.

Abstract

Consumers not only experience embarrassment due to various events, but can always feel embarrassed when they purchase particular products. When consumers purchase these types of products, they may hesitate decisions or have a negative attitude toward the entire purchase experience. Thus, to identify consumer’s purchase deferral in context of purchasing embarrassing products, this study synthetically investigated the effects of self-control as a personal tendency and subject of product usage, and the interaction effect of self-control and gain/loss message framing on the purchase deferral. The results showed that when consumers purchase an embarrassing product for themselves, purchase deferral is higher for consumers with weak self-control than those who with strong self-control. However, when consumes purchase an embarrassing product for friend, there is no significant difference in purchase deferral between consumers with strong and weak level of self-control. In addition, in gain frame, purchase deferral is higher for consumers with weak self-control than those who with strong self-control, there is no significant difference in purchase deferral. To broaden understanding of purchasing an embarrassing product, this study comprehensively examined the personal, situational and environment factors that consumers encounter in an offline store. The results of this research can provide useful practical guidance for companies that sell embarrassing products.

참고문헌 (57)

  1. Andrus, David M., "Status brand management and gift purchase : A discriminant analysis", Journal of Consumer Marketing, 3(1), pp.5~13 (1986)
  2. Baek, Tae Hyun, "Guilt and shame : Environmental message framing effects", Journal of Advertising, 46(3), pp.440~453 (2017)
  3. Baumeister, Roy F., "Yielding to temptation : Self-control failure, impulsive purchasing, and consumer behavior", Journal of Consumer Research, 28(4), pp.670~676 (2002)
  4. Baumeister, Roy F., "Self-regulation and self-control", pp.16~44 (2018), Routledge
  5. Baumeister, Roy F., "The strength model of selfcontrol", Current Directions in Psychological Science, 16(6), pp.351~355 (2007)
  6. Belk, Russell, "Research in Marketing, Vol. 2", pp.95~126 (1979), JAI
  7. Bernecker, Katharina, "No Pain, no Gain? Investigating motivational mechanisms of game elements in cognitive tasks", Computers in Human Behavior, 114, pp.106542~ (2021)
  8. Bieleke, Maik, "Getting trapped in a dead end? Trait selfcontrol and boredom are linked to goal adjustment", Motivation and Emotion, pp.1~15 (2022)
  9. Blair, Sean, "Balancing the basket : the role of shopping basket composition in embarrassment", Journal of Consumer Research, 40(4), pp.676~691 (2013)
  10. Chang, Hua, "Message framing in green advertising : The effect of construal level and consumer environmental concern", International Journal of Advertising, 34(1), pp.158~176 (2015)
  11. Chen, Cheng, "Are you addicted to Candy Crush Saga? An exploratory study linking psychological factors to mobile social game addiction", Telematics and Informatics, 33(4), pp.1155~1166 (2016)
  12. Choi, Ben C.F., "Privacy tradeoffand social application usage", 2015 48th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences IEEE, pp.304~313 (2015)
  13. Dahl, Darren W., "Embarrassment in consumer purchase : The roles of social presence and purchase familiarity", Journal of Consumer Research, 28(3), pp.473~481 (2001)
  14. Dhar, Ravi, "Context and task effects on choice deferral", Marketing Letters, 8(1), pp.119~130 (1997)
  15. ling, Grahame R, "A model of perceived risk and intended riskhandling activity", Journal of Consumer Research, 21(1), pp.119~134 (1994)
  16. Duhachek, Adam, "Guilt versus shame : Coping, fluency, and framing in the effectiveness of responsible drinking messages", Journal of Marketing Research, 49(6), pp.928~941 (2012)
  17. Ein-Gar, Danit, "The role of consumer self-control in the consumption of virtue products", International Journal of Research in Marketing, 29(2), pp.123~133 (2012)
  18. Esmark, Carol L., "I’ll be watching you : Shoppers’ reactions to perceptions of being watched by employees", Journal of Retailing, 93(3), pp.336~349 (2017)
  19. Esmark Jones, Carol L., "Appreciating Anonymity : An Exploration of Embarrassing Products and the Power of Blending In", Journal of Retailing, 94(2), pp.186~202 (2018)
  20. Greenleaf, Eric A., "Reasons for substantial delay in consumer decision making", Journal of Consumer Research, 22(2), pp.186~199 (1995)
  21. Jeuland, Abel P., "Dealing-temporary price cuts-by seller as a buyer discrimination mechanism", Journal of Business, 29, pp.5~308 (1985)
  22. Jonas, Eva, "Giving advice or making decisions in someone else’s place : The influence of impression, defense, and accuracy motivation on the search for new information", Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31(7), pp.977~990 (2005)
  23. Kahneman, Daniel, "Judgment under uncertainty:Heuristics and biases", pp.201~208 (1982)
  24. Keltner, Dacher, "Embarrassment : its distinct form and appeasement functions", Psychological Bulletin, 122(3), pp.250~ (1997)
  25. Kray, Laura J., "Contingent weighting in self-other decision making", Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 83(1), pp.82~106 (2000)
  26. Kureshi, Sonal, "Testing the influence of message framing, donation magnitude, and product category in a causerelated marketing context", Journal of Marketing Communications, 26(3), pp.268~289 (2020)
  27. Laran, Juliano, "Goal management in sequential choices : Consumer choices for others are more indulgent than personal choices", Journal of Consumer Research, 37(2), pp.304~314 (2010)
  28. Lee, Hsiao-Ching, "Positive or negative? The influence of message framing, regulatory focus, and product type", International Journal of Communication, 12, pp.18~ (2018)
  29. Lewis, Michael, "Handbook of emotions", pp.742~756 (2008), The Guilford Press
  30. Li, Caina, "Internet addiction among Chinese adolescents : The effect of parental behavior and self-control", Computers in Human Behavior, 41, pp.1~7 (2014)
  31. Logue, Alexandra Woods, "Self-control: Waiting until tomorrow for what you want today" (1995), Prentice-Hall, Inc
  32. Montinari, Natalia, "Risk taking on behalf of others : The role of social distance", Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 57(1), pp.81~109 (2018)
  33. Nandakumar, Nachiketas, "Threat, efficacy and message framing in consumer healthcare", Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 35(4), pp.442~457 (2017)
  34. Nichols, Bridget Satinover, "Effects of consumer embarrassment on shopping basket size and value : A study of the millennial consumer", Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 14(1), pp.41~56 (2015)
  35. Oliver Richard, L., "Satisfaction: A behavioral perspective on the consumer" (1997), Irwin-McGraw-Hill
  36. Pollai, Maria, "Differences in risk-defusing behavior in deciding for oneself versus deciding for other people", Acta Psychologica, 139(1), pp.239~243 (2012)
  37. Polman, Evan, "Self-other decision making and loss aversion", Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 119(2), pp.141~150 (2012)
  38. Pounders, Kathrynn R., "Matching temporal frame, self-view, and message frame valence : Improving persuasiveness in health communications", Journal of Advertising, 44(4), pp.388~402 (2015)
  39. Puto, Christopher P., "The framing of buying decisions", Journal of Consumer Research, 14(3), pp.301~315 (1987)
  40. Sheikh, Sana, "The “shoulds” and “should nots” of moral emotions: A self-regulatory perspective on shame and guilt", Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36(2), pp.213~224 (2010)
  41. Sun, Qingzhou, "Increased social distance makes people more risk-neutral", The Journal of Social Psychology, 157(4), pp.502~512 (2017)
  42. Stocks, Eric L., "Altruism or psychological escape: Why does empathy promote prosocial behavior?", European Journal of Social Psychology, 39(5), pp.649~665 (2009)
  43. Tangney, June Price, "Self-conscious emotions: The psychology of shame, guilt, embarrassment, and pride" (1995), Guilford
  44. Tangney, June Price, "Selfregulation and self-control", pp.173~212 (2018), Routledge
  45. Tangney, June Price, "Are shame, guilt, and embarrassment distinct emotions?", Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70(6), pp.1256~ (1996)
  46. Ting-Toomey, Stella, "Self-construal types and conflict management styles", Communication Reports, 14(2), pp.87~104 (2001)
  47. Tversky, Amos, "Multiple criteria decision making and risk analysis using microcomputers" (1989), Springer
  48. Updegraff, John A., "The effects of message quality and congruency on perceptions of tailored health communications", Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 43(2), pp.249~257 (2007)
  49. Uziel, Liad, "Impression management("lie")scales are associated with interpersonally oriented self-control, not other-deception", Journal of Personality, 82(3), pp.200~212 (2014)
  50. Uziel, Liad, "The effect of public social context on self-control : Depletion for neuroticism and restoration for impression management", Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 38(3), pp.384~396 (2012)
  51. Van Boven, Leaf, "The illusion of courage in social predictions : Underestimating the impact of fear of embarrassment on other people", Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 96(2), pp.130~141 (2005)
  52. Van't Riet, Jonathan, "Selfefficacy moderates message-framing effects : The case of skin-cancer detection", Psychology and Health, 25(3), pp.339~349 (2010)
  53. Verbeke, Willem, "A situational analysis on how salespeople experience and cope with shame and embarrassmen", Psychology & Marketing, 19(9), pp.713~741 (2002)
  54. Wagner, Janet, "The effect of donor-recipient involvement on consumer gift decisions", Advances in Consumer Research, 17(1), pp.683~689 (1990)
  55. Williams, Lawrence, "The distinct affective consequences of psychological distance and construal level", Journal of Consumer Research, 40(6), pp.1123~1138 (2014)
  56. Yan, Changmin, "The effects of mood, message framing, and behavioral advocacy on persuasion", Journal of Communication, 60(2), pp.344~363 (2010)
  57. Zhou, Qing, "Positive psychological assessment: A handbook of models andmeasures", pp.269~284 (2003), American Psychological Association

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (11건)