트위터에 나타난 접두어 ‘개-’의 사용 양상
On the Usage Patterns of the Korean Prefix kay- on Twitter
1
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
A few researchers have recently claimed that the prefix kay-, which literally means ‘dog’, has undergone a dramatic change over the past decade. Before the change, kay- was severely confined in terms of its syntax and semantics; it was restricted to combine with a handful of nouns, and semantically, it had the sole function of adding or boosting the negative sense of its host. Kay- is no longer used as such. It can virtually combine with a host of any category which has gradable meaning, as its semantics has acquired the function of an emphatic marker like very. A linguistic change is driven by the people who use it. As the number of people who adopt and use the new features of a linguistic item grows, the chance of its survival as a transformed linguistic entity increases. Thus, it is important to examine in a precise manner how kay- is used in order to track the course of change it has gone through in the past and to predict its survival in the future. No such effort, however, has been made so far. In this article, we show that we can obtain an extensive amount of data showing the real time usage of kay- over the past decade using techniques developed in informatics and that kay- has indeed undergone a dramatic change, as reported by other researchers. We also show, by analyzing the data extracted from tweets tweeted during the 48 hours, that kay- is much more frequently used in comtemporary Korean in the new pattern than in the old pattern, a concrete piece of evidence to back the claim that kay- is productively used.
Abstract
A few researchers have recently claimed that the prefix kay-, which literally means ‘dog’, has undergone a dramatic change over the past decade. Before the change, kay- was severely confined in terms of its syntax and semantics; it was restricted to combine with a handful of nouns, and semantically, it had the sole function of adding or boosting the negative sense of its host. Kay- is no longer used as such. It can virtually combine with a host of any category which has gradable meaning, as its semantics has acquired the function of an emphatic marker like very. A linguistic change is driven by the people who use it. As the number of people who adopt and use the new features of a linguistic item grows, the chance of its survival as a transformed linguistic entity increases. Thus, it is important to examine in a precise manner how kay- is used in order to track the course of change it has gone through in the past and to predict its survival in the future. No such effort, however, has been made so far. In this article, we show that we can obtain an extensive amount of data showing the real time usage of kay- over the past decade using techniques developed in informatics and that kay- has indeed undergone a dramatic change, as reported by other researchers. We also show, by analyzing the data extracted from tweets tweeted during the 48 hours, that kay- is much more frequently used in comtemporary Korean in the new pattern than in the old pattern, a concrete piece of evidence to back the claim that kay- is productively used.
참고문헌 (18)
- 강희숙, "통신언어에 나타난 역문법화 현상 고찰 - 접두사 ‘개-’의 용법을 중심으로 -", 한민족어문학(구 영남어문학), (61), pp.61~87 (2012), 한민족어문학회[DOI]
- 김정선, "청소년 입말에 나타난 비속어·유행어·은어 사용 실태", 한국언어문학, (77), pp.285~324 (2011), 한국언어문학회
- 김정선, "청소년의 입말에 나타난 비속어와 공격적 언어 표현 사용 실태 조사", 국어교육, (140), pp.153~181 (2013), 한국어교육학회
- 김태경, "청소년의 비속어․욕설․은어․유행어 사용 실태와 언어 의식 연구", 국제어문, (54), pp.43~93 (2012), 국제어문학회[DOI]
- 노명희, "국어의 탈문법화 현상과 단어화", 國語學, (67), pp.107~144 (2013), 국어학회[DOI]
- "개좋다" (2016)[URL]
- 손평효, "‘개-’의 생산성과 범주 설정의 문제 -신어 ‘개+X’ 유형을 중심으로-", 우리말연구, (39), pp.86~116 (2014), 우리말학회
- 엽영임, "강조어 ‘완전’의 사용에 대한 고찰 -구어와 통신언어를 중심으로-", 한국어 의미학, 52, pp.251~269 (2016), 한국어의미학회[DOI]
- 이탁, "국어 어원 풀이의 일단", 한글, 140, pp.26~72 (1967)
- 이하얀, "‘완전’의 문법 기능의 확장에 대하여", 한국어학, 74, pp.147~167 (2017), 한국어학회[DOI]
- 임현열, "신조어에서 나타나는 어형 변화의 한 양상 - 정도부사 ‘캡(<Captain)>캐>개’의 변화를 중심으로 -", 어문론집, 63, pp.111~136 (2015), 중앙어문학회[DOI]
- 장경현, "신조어 접사의 형태·의미 특성 연구", 열린정신 인문학 연구, 20(1), pp.311~336 (2019), 인문학연구소[DOI]
- 장부리, "한중 통신 언어의 문법화와 역문법화 비교 연구", 석사, 국어국문학과, pp.2013
- 전은진, "문자 언어에 나타난 청소년 언어 실태 연구", 청람어문교육, (43), pp.371~406 (2011), 청람어문교육학회[DOI]
- 정상준, "언어 네트워크 기반 대통령기록물 관련 이슈 및 매체별 특성 분석", 한국비블리아학회지, 30(1), pp.181~207 (2019), 한국비블리아학회[DOI]
- "국립국어원" (2020), 표준국어대사전[URL]
- 홍달오, "접두사의 준부사화 경향에 대한 고찰 -접두사 ‘개-’를 중심으로-", 언어, 39(1), pp.231~249 (2014), 한국언어학회[DOI]
- Oh, H. -J., "Public sense of water fluoridation as reflected on Twitter 2009-2017", Journal of Dental Research, 99(1), pp.11~17 (2020)
