The Use of Periphrastic Do with Reference to the Book of Common Prayer
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Chomsky’s Minimalist Program (Chomsky 1995 to 2019a,b,c) claims that language change can be explained as resulting from the resetting of parameters, where the parameters are seen as operating in the lexicon as feature parameters. Likewise, the origin of and changes in English periphrastic do or the do-support can be accounted for by parameter-resetting modulated by markedness. The dates of the two principal editions of the Book of Common Prayer (BCP), 1552 and 1662, roughly coincide with the periods of the rise and fall of the affirmative declarative do, respectively. It is claimed that, based on the data of BCP and others, the English parameter-resetting concerning the periphrastic do began, in the mid-16th century, from strong V feature Tense to weak V feature Tense.
Abstract
Chomsky’s Minimalist Program (Chomsky 1995 to 2019a,b,c) claims that language change can be explained as resulting from the resetting of parameters, where the parameters are seen as operating in the lexicon as feature parameters. Likewise, the origin of and changes in English periphrastic do or the do-support can be accounted for by parameter-resetting modulated by markedness. The dates of the two principal editions of the Book of Common Prayer (BCP), 1552 and 1662, roughly coincide with the periods of the rise and fall of the affirmative declarative do, respectively. It is claimed that, based on the data of BCP and others, the English parameter-resetting concerning the periphrastic do began, in the mid-16th century, from strong V feature Tense to weak V feature Tense.
참고문헌 (59)
- Bacquet, P., "La structure de la prase vrbale a lepoque Alfrediene" (1962), L'Universite de Strasbourg
- Bosworth, J., "The gospels: Gothic, Anglo-Saxon, Wycliffe and Tyndale Versions" (1907), Gibbings and Company
- Barber, C., "Early Modern English" (1976), Andre Deutsch Limited
- 조남호, "조동사 DO의 기원", 영어학연구, 16, pp.161~188 (2003), 한국영어학학회
- Chomsky, N., "The minimalist program" (1995), MIT Press
- Chomsky, N., "Ken Hale: A life in language", pp.1~52 (2001), MIT Press
- Chomsky, N., "Structures and beyond: The cartography of syntactic structures, 3", pp.104~131 (2004), Oxford University Press
- Chomsky, N., "Three factors in language design", Linguistic Inquiry, 36(1), pp.1~22 (2005)
- Chomsky, N., "Interfaces + recursion = language?", pp.1~29 (2007), Mouton de Gruyter
- Chomsky, N., "Foundational issues in linguistic theory: Essays in honor of Jean-Roger Vergnaud", pp.291~321 (2008), MIT Press
- Chomsky, N., "Porblems of Projection", Lingua, 130, pp.33~49 (2013)
- Chomsky, N., "Structures, strategies and beyond", pp.3~16 (2015), John Benjamins
- Chomsky, N., "Some puzzling foundational issues: The Reading program", Catalan Journal of Linguistics, (Special), pp.263~285 (2019)
- Chomsky, N., "Fundamental issues in linguistics, MIT lectures, April 10th and 12th", ~ (2019)
- "UCLA lectures, April 29th, 30th, May 1st, 2nd" (2019)[URL]
- Chomsky, N, "Generative grammar and the faculty of language: Insights, questions, and challenges", CJL (2019)
- Denison, D., "English historical syntax: Verbal constructions" (1993), Longman
- Ellegård, A., "The auxiliary 'do': the establishment and regulation of its growth in English. (Gothenburg Studies in English,)" (1953), Almqvist & Wiksell
- Gelderen, E. van, "The Oxford handbook of grammaticalization", pp.43~55 (2011), Oxford University Press
- Gelderen, E. van, "The Cambridge handbook of historical syntax" (2017), Cambridge University Press
- Gelderen, E. van, "Analyzing syntax Through texts: Old, Middle, and Early Modern English" (2018), Edinburgh University Press
- Gelderen, E. van, "Verb-second and expletives and current Minimalist Program", ICEHL, 12 (2021)
- "Changes in little v and Voice" (2021)[URL]
- "The linguistic cycle: An introduction and change of my focus" (2021)[URL]
- "Third factors in variation and change. Recent theoretical advances in Historical Syntax" (2022)[URL]
- "Some consequences of merge and determinacy" (2018)[URL]
- Jespersen, O., "A Modern English grammar on historical principles I-VII" (1949), Allen and Unwin
- Kim, H., "Old English: history, grammar, and texts" (2011), Hankookmunhwasa
- Lee, P.-H., "The origins of the dummy auxiliary do", Linguistics, 7(2), pp.15~34 (1999)
- Lee, P.-H., "The history and linguistic change of English" (2009), Hankookmunhwasa
- Lightfoot, D., "How to set parameters: Arguments from language change" (1991), MIT Press
- Lightfoot, D., "The development of language" (1999), Blackwell
- Lightfoot, D., "Handbook of historical linguistics" (2002), Blackwell
- Lightfoot, D., "Syntactic effects of morphological change" (2002), Oxford University Press
- Los, B., "A historical syntax of English" (2015), Edinburgh University Press
- Nevalainen, T., "THE rhythm hypothesis of adverb placement: A case study of 'Only'", Neuphilologische Mitteilungen, 88(4), pp.365~377 (1987)
- Nevalainen, T., "Historical English syntax" (1991), Mouton de Gruyter
- Nevalainen, T., "The multilingual origins of standard English" (2020), Walter de Gruyter GmbH
- Nevalainen, T., "A corpus of early modern standard English in a socio-historical perspective", Neuphilologische Mitteilungen, 90(1), pp.67~110 (1989)
- Nevalainen, T., "Sociolinguistics and language history: The Helsinki corpus of Early English correspondence", Hermes-Journal of Language, 13 (1994)
- Pérez, "The use of periphrastic "do" in Early Modern English negative declaratives: evidence from the Helsinki Corpus", Sederi, 8 (1997)
- Radford, A., "Minimalist Syntax: Exploring the Structure of English" (2004), Cambridge, University Press
- Radford, A., "Analysing english sentences: A minimalist approach" (2009), Cambridge University Press
- Radford, A., "Analysing English sentences" (2016), Cambridge University Press
- Roberts, I., "Verbs and diachronic syntax" (1993), Kluwer
- Roberts, I., "Diachronic syntax" (2007), Oxford University Press
- 신성균, "영어의 통사변화와 매개변항의 재고정", 박사, 영어학, pp.1992
- Shin, S., "A minimalist approach to English impersonal constructions", Humanities and Sciences Research, 9, pp.133~145 (2001)
- 신성균, "A Minimalist Approach to the diachronic study of English modals", 영어학연구, (21), pp.221~238 (2006), 한국영어학학회
- 신성균, "The Origin of Do-Support and Parameter-Resetting", 영어영문학연구, 52(2), pp.185~201 (2010), 한국중앙영어영문학회[DOI]
- 신성균, "A Minimalist Approach to the Diachronic Study of English Word Order", 인문과학연구, (53), pp.133~166 (2017), 인문과학연구소
- 신성균, "Parameter-Resetting and Diachronic Changesof English Negation", 언어학 연구, (51), pp.89~107 (2019), 한국중원언어학회[DOI]
- 신성균, "A Diachronic Study of English Reflexives and Pronouns with Feature Respecification", 영어영문학연구, 61(1), pp.199~225 (2019), 한국중앙영어영문학회[DOI]
- 신성균, "The Degrammaticalization of the English To-Infinitive and Parameter-Resetting", 언어, 46(1), pp.165~188 (2021), 한국언어학회[DOI]
- 신성균, "The Grammaticalization of English Modals and Parameter-Resetting", 영어영문학연구, 63(4), pp.293~324 (2021), 한국중앙영어영문학회
- 신성균, "A Diachronic Syntactic Study on the Parable of the Prodigal Son", 영어영문학연구, 64(4), pp.213~235 (2022), 한국중앙영어영문학회
- Tieken, -B., "The origin and development of Periphrastic Auxiliary Do: a Case of Destigmatisation", Dutch Working Papers in English Language and Linguistics, 3, pp.283~284 (1988)
- Traugott, E. C., "The history of English syntax: A transformational approach to the history of English sentence structure" (1972), Holt, Rinehart and Winston
- Visser, T. H., "An historical syntax of the English language, 4 Volumes" (1963), E. J. Brill
