본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

공격성에 대한 조건추론검사(CRT-A)의 예측타당도연구: 외현적 공격성과의 상호작용 효과

A Study on the predictive validity of Conditional Reasoning Test for Aggression: Interaction effect with self-reported measures

장재윤|이혜주|전소현
한국산업및조직심리학회 (Korean Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology)|2017.11|한국심리학회지: 산업 및 조직 (Korean Journal of Industrial and Organizational Psychology)|제30권 제4호|pp. 541-562|DOI 10.24230/ksiop.30.4.201711.541

0

조회

0

다운로드

3

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

공격성Aggression조건추론검사Conditional Reasoning Test도움행동경로화 가설암묵적 측정channeling hypothesisimplicit measurement. helping behavior
주제분류심리과학

초록

본 연구는 조직시민행동의 한 요인인 도움행동을 예측함에 있어서 암묵적 공격성을 측정하는 조건추론검사(Conditional Reasoning Test for Aggression; CRT-A)와 자기보고형 공격성 측정치의 상호작용 효과를 확인하고자 하였다. 대기업 종사자 중 중국과 인도로 파견된 주재원들 101명을 대상으로, 조건추론검사와 자기보고형 설문지로 암묵적 공격성과 외현적 공격성을 측정하고 공통방법 영향을 최소화하기 위해 주재원들의 현지 동료들로부터 주재원의 도움행동 정도를 설문지를 통하여 수집하였다. 연구 결과, 암묵적 공격성이 높은 사람들은 자신의 외현적 공격성을 인식하는 정도에 따라 도움행동을 보이는 정도에서 차이를 보였는데 자신이 ‘공격적이지 않다’고 인식하는 사람일수록 도움행동을 더 적게 보였다. 구체적으로, CRT-A 점수는 높지만 자기보고형 공격성 점수는 낮은 ‘잠재된 공격성(latent aggressives)’ 집단에서 도움행동을 가장 적게 하는 것으로 나타났다. 본 연구결과를 바탕으로 연구의 시사점및 제한점과 더불어 후속 연구방향에 대해 논의하였다.

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to examine the channeling model to investigate the interaction effect of implicit measure (Conditional Reasoning Test for Aggression: CRT-A) and self-reported measure of aggression to predict helping behavior. Expatriates who were dispatched to China or India (N=101) participated in this study. To reduce the common method bias, their host country co-workers (N=320) evaluated the expatriates’ helping behavior as a behavioral criterion. The results showed that there was a significance difference in helping behavior among the expatriates who had high CRT-A scores. Specifically, latent aggressive individuals who consciously perceived themselves as being non-aggressive but implicitly rationalized their aggressive behavior were less likely to show helping behavior. The academic implications of the current study, along with suggestions for the future research, were discussed.

참고문헌 (54)

  1. 서수균, "한국판 공격성 질문지의 타당화 연구", Korean Journal of Clinical Psychology, 21(2), pp.487~501 (2002), 한국임상심리학회
  2. 김민영, "Application of the Revised Version of the CRT-RMS to Korean Samples", 한국심리학회지:일반, 33(3), pp.591~607 (2014), 한국심리학회
  3. 김민정, "외현적·암묵적 자존감과 분노 상황에 따른 공격성 차이 연구", 상담학연구, 15(4), pp.1343~1363 (2014), 한국상담학회[DOI]
  4. 이혜주, "Why Implicit and Explicit Measures for Aggression Are Not Related: Qualitative Review", 한국심리학회지:일반, 33(2), pp.417~440 (2014), 한국심리학회
  5. 이혜주, "The cross-cultural generalizability of the CRT-RMS to Korean samples", 한국심리학회지:일반, 31(4), pp.1059~1071 (2012), 한국심리학회
  6. 홍승범, "Cultural differences in the perception of a leader's anger expression", 2015년도 한국 산업 및 조직심리학회 추계 심포지엄 및 학술대회 발표 논문집, pp.19~30 (2015)
  7. Adam, H., "Cultural variance in the interpersonal effects of anger in negotiations", Psychological Science, 21, pp.882~889 (2010)
  8. Barrick, M. R., "Effects of impression management and self-deception on the predictive validity of personality constructs", Journal of Applied Psychology, 81(3), pp.261~272 (1996)
  9. Baumeister, R. F., "Freudian defense mechanisms and empirical findings in modern social psychology : Reaction formation, projection, displacement, undoing, isolation, sublimation, and denial", Journal of Personality, 66, pp.1081~1124 (1998)
  10. Beech, B., "Workplace violence in the health care sector：A review of staff training and integration of training evaluation models", Aggression and Violent Behavior, 11, pp.27~43 (2006)
  11. Bergman, S. M., "Identifying the aggressive personality", Journal of Emotional Abuse, 4, pp.81~93 (2004)
  12. Bing, M. N., "Integrating implicit and explicit social cognitions for enhanced personality assessment : A general framework for choosing measurement and statistical methods", Organizational Research Methods, 10, pp.346~389 (2007)
  13. Bing, M. N., "An integrative typology of personality assessment for aggression: implications for predicting counterproductive workplace behavior", Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, pp.722~744 (2007)
  14. Bolton, L. R., "Counterproductive work behaviours in response to emotional exhaustion : A moderated mediational approach", Stress and Health, 28, pp.222~233 (2012)
  15. Brunstein, J. C., "Implicit and self-attributed motives to achieve : Two separate but interacting needs", Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, pp.205~222 (2005)
  16. Buss, A. H., "The aggression questionnaire", Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, pp.452~459 (1992)
  17. Cox, D. L., "The anger advantage: The surprising benefits of anger and how it can change a women's life" (2003), Broadway Books
  18. Dollard, J., "Frustration and aggression" (1939), Yale University Press
  19. Frost, B. C., "Implicit and explicit personality : A test of a channeling hypothesis for aggressive behavior", Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, pp.1299~1319 (2007)
  20. Fry D. P., "Cross-cultural approaches to research on aggression and reconciliation", pp.123~148 (2001), Nova Science Publishers
  21. Greenwald, A. G., "Implicit social cognition: Attitudes, self-esteem, and stereotypes", Psychological Review, 102(1), pp.4~27 (1995)
  22. Hawley, P. H., "Aggression and adaptive functioning : The bright side to bad behavior", Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 49(3), pp.239~242 (2003)
  23. Henry, P. J., "Low-status compensation : A theory for understanding the role of status in cultures of honor", Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97, pp.451~466 (2009)
  24. Hobfoll, S. E., "Handbook of organization behavior", pp.57~81 (2000), Dekker
  25. Hofstede, G., "Culture’s consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions, and organizations across nations" (2001), Sage Publications
  26. Janssens, M., "Intercultural interaction: A burden on international managers?", Journal of Organizational Behavior, 16, pp.155~167 (1995)
  27. James, L. R., "Measurement of personality via conditional reasoning", Organizational Research Methods, 1, pp.131~163 (1998)
  28. James, L. R., "Assessing the implicit personality through conditional reasoning" (2011), American Psychological Association
  29. James, L. R., "Personality in work organizations" (2002), Sage
  30. James, L. R., "The conditional reasoning measurement for aggression", Human Performance, 17, pp.271~295 (2004)
  31. James, L. R., "A conditional reasoning measure for aggression", Organizational Research Methods, 8, pp.69~99 (2005)
  32. Kuhn, D., "The skills of argument" (1991), Cambridge University Press
  33. Lang, J. W., "Implicit motives, explicit traits, and task and contextual performance at work", Journal of Applied Psychology, 97, pp.1201~1217 (2012)
  34. LeBlanc, M. M., "Predictors and outcomes of workplace violence and aggression", Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(3), pp.444~453 (2002)
  35. LeBreton, J. M., "Measurement issues associated with conditional reasoning tests : indirect measurement and test faking", Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, pp.1~16 (2007)
  36. Lee, L. Y., "The effects of cultural intelligence on expatriate performance : The moderating effects of international experience", International Journal of Human Resource Management, 21, pp.963~981 (2010)
  37. Markus H. R., "How healthy are we? A national study of well-being at midlife", pp.273~319 (2004), The University of Chicago Press
  38. McClelland, D. C., "Personality" (1951), Sloane
  39. McClelland, D. C., "How Do Self-Attributed and Implicit Motives Differ?", Psychological Review, 96(4), pp.690~702 (1989)
  40. Nisbett, R. E., "Telling more than we can know : Verbal reports on mental processes", Psychological Review, 84, pp.231~259 (1977)
  41. Park, J., "Social status and anger expression : The cultural moderation hypothesis", Emotion, 13, pp.1122~1131 (2013)
  42. Peek-Asa, C., "Workplace-violence investigations by the California Division of Occupational Safety and Health, 1993-1996", Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 41, pp.647~653 (1999)
  43. Penney, L. M., "Research companion to emotion in organizations", pp.183~196 (2007), Edward Elgar Publishing
  44. Podsakoff, P. M., "Organizational Citizenship Behavior and the Quantity and Quality of Work Group Performance", Journal of Applied Psychology, 82(2), pp.262~270 (1997)
  45. Schaufeli, W. B., "How Changes in Job Demands and Resources Predict Burnout, Work Engagement, and Sickness Absenteeism", Journal of Organizational Behavior, 30(7), pp.893~917 (2009)
  46. Schat, A. C., "Handbook of work stress", pp.189~218 (2005), Sage Publications
  47. Shrout, P. E., "Intraclass correlations : Uses in assessing rater reliability", Psychological Bulletin, 86(2), pp.420~428 (1979)
  48. Stahl G. K., "The Effectiveness of Expatriate Coping Strategies : The Moderating Role of Cultural Distance, Position Level, and Time on the International Assignment", Journal of applied Psychology, 90(4), pp.603~615 (2005)
  49. Stieger, S., "Implicit and Explicit Self-Esteem in the Context of Internet Addiction", Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 13(6), pp.681~688 (2010)
  50. Takeuchi, R., "An examination of crossover and spillover effects of spousal and expatriate cross-cultural adjustment on expatriate outcomes", Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, pp.655~666 (2002)
  51. Taylor, T., "Doing deference or speaking up: Deconstructing the experience and expression of anger", Race, Gender & Class, 13, pp.60~80 (2006)
  52. Tett, R. P., "Situation Trait Relevance, Trait Expression, and Cross-situational Consistency: Testing a Principle of Trait Activation", Journal of Research in Personality, 34, pp.397~423 (2000)
  53. Uhlmann, E. L., "Getting explicit about the implicit : A taxonomy of implicit measures and guide for their use in organizational research", Organizational Research Methods, 15, pp.553~601 (2012)
  54. Winter, D. G., "Traits and motives : Toward an integration of two traditions in personality research", Psychological Review, 105(2), pp.230~250 (1998)

관련 논문AI추천

Why Implicit and Explicit Measures for Aggression Are Not Related: Qualitative Review이혜주한국심리학회 · 한국심리학회지:일반2014 · 제33권 제2호Application of the Revised Version of the CRT-RMS to Korean Samples김민영한국심리학회 · 한국심리학회지:일반2014 · 제33권 제3호외현적·암묵적 자존감과 분노 상황에 따른 공격성 차이 연구김민정, 이기학한국상담학회 · 상담학연구2014 · 제15권 제4호자기보고형 성격검사의 준거 관련 타당도에 영향을 미치는 사회적 선희도 반응의 조절효과남상희, 장재윤한국산업및조직심리학회 · 한국심리학회지: 산업 및 조직2015 · 제28권 제2호특성분노와 공격성 간의 관계에서 공감적 관여와 조망수용의 조절효과조명현한국감성과학회 · 감성과학2021 · 제24권 제1호사무직 종사자의 직장폭력 의도에 영향을 미치는 요인 연구이윤호, 이장욱한국경찰학회 · 한국경찰학회보2017 · 제19권 제5호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (5건)

소명의식과 진로적응성의 관계에서 소명실행의 조절효과민지현, 강에스더, 이혜주pp. 491-516군 리더와 부하의 권력거리성향 차이가 군에 대한 태도 및 행동에 미치는 영향손영우, 최영남, 정은경pp. 517-540조직변화가 직무스트레스에 미치는 영향에서 고용불안의 매개효과: 무경계경력태도의 조절효과를 중심으로원용재, 탁진국pp. 563-587감정노동의 장기화에 따른 개인의 직무 중, 직무 외 정서조절 차이김소희, 김민영pp. 589-605신입사원의 주도적 성격이 심리적 계약에 미치는 영향: 리더-부하 교환관계(LMX)의 매개효과를 중심으로김경민pp. 607-626
원문 보기