본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

창의성 역설: 창의성이 중요하다고 믿을수록 타인의 창의적 특성을 더 바람직하게 평가하는가?

The creativity paradox: The more you believe creativity is important, the more desirable you rate the creative characteristics of others?

장재윤|서희영
한국산업및조직심리학회 (Korean Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology)|2023.11|한국심리학회지: 산업 및 조직 (Korean Journal of Industrial and Organizational Psychology)|제36권 제4호|pp. 403-437|DOI https://doi.org/10.24230/kjiop.v36i4.403-437

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

Creativity창의성Creative characteristics창의적 마인드셋창의성 역설창의적 성격특성자기 창의성 지각Creativity ParadoxCreative mindsetsSelf-creativity
주제분류심리과학

초록

본 연구는 사회 전반에 걸쳐 창의성이 강조되나 창의적인 사람은 환영받지 못하는 현상을 조명하고 이에 영향을 미치는 개인차 변인을 탐색하고자 하였다. 미국 교사들의 창의적 성 격특성에 대한 역설적 지각을 재확인한 선행 연구(Kettler et al., 2018)를 따라 연구 1에서는 한국 초․중․고등 교사 172명을 대상으로 개인차 변인을 조사하고, 학생들의 성격특성(창의 적 및 반창의적 특성)을 평가하게 하였다. 그 결과 한국 교사들 역시 창의적 성격특성을 덜 바람직하게 평가하는 것으로 나타나 선행 연구의 결과를 재확인하였다. 이를 확장하여 연구 2에서는 한국 기업의 정규직 331명을 대상으로 창의성 역설 현상과 이에 대한 창의적 마인 드셋의 영향을 살펴보고자 하였다. 분석 결과, 창의성에 대한 역설이 직장 맥락에서 더욱 두 드러지게 나타났다. 선행 연구 및 연구 1에서와 같이 타인의 창의적 성격특성 평가에 유일 하게 영향을 미치는 개인차 변인은 자기 창의성 지각으로 나타났으며, 이를 창의적 성장 마 인드셋이 조절하는 것으로 나타났다. 마지막으로 본 연구가 갖는 시사점과 연구의 제한점 및 향후 연구 방향에 대해 논의하였다.

Abstract

This study aims to shed light on Creativity Paradox which is a phenomenon that creative people are not appreciated where creativity is emphasized, and to explore individual differences that affect the phenomenon. As per the previous research (Kettler et al., 2018) that even teachers who say they value creativity as educational goals actually find creative characteristics undesirable through the replication from school (Study 1) and expansion to organization (Study 2). In Study 1, 172 schoolteachers in Korea completed 2 waves of survey for the importance of educational goals including creativity and personal creativity with the desirability on characteristics for both creative indicative and contraindicative. In study 2, 331 fulltime employees completed 2 waves of survey including creative mindsets. Result indicated that both teachers and employees in this study rated characteristics associated with creativity as less desirable than those characteristics that are considered contraindicative, which confirms the Creativity Paradox. No effects were found based on the individual differences, but the level of personal creativity related to how desirable they rate others’ characteristics associated with creativity. As a result of hierarchical regression analysis, the moderating effect of creative growth mindset was partially presented in the relationship between the personal creativity and the members’ perception of creative characteristics, while no effect of fixed-creative mindset was presented. This study was intended to highlight the need of examining the implicit theory of, attitude toward, and changes of norms and climate related to creativity in the organizational context The implications, limits and future research suggestions were discussed.

참고문헌 (57)

  1. 100대 기업이 원하는인재상 보고서, "대한상공회의소", 대한상공회의소, ~ (2018)
  2. 서은영, "성장지향성과 직무 개선이 창의적 행동에 미치는 영향: 개인이 지각한 발전문화의 조절된 매개효과", 한국심리학회지: 산업 및 조직, 32(4), pp.389~417 (2019), 한국산업및조직심리학회[DOI]
  3. 이순묵, "산업조직에서의 창의성에 대한 개념적 및 경험적 접근", 한국심리학회지: 산업 및 조직, 21(1), pp.151~178 (2008), 한국산업및조직심리학회[DOI]
  4. 장재윤, "한국 성인들의 창의성 신화에 대한 믿음 및 관련 변인 탐색", 한국심리학회지:일반, 42(2), pp.87~118 (2023), 한국심리학회[DOI]
  5. Amabile, T. M., "Motivating creativity in organizations : On doing what you love and loving what you do", California Management Review, 40(1), pp.39~58 (1997)[DOI]
  6. Anderson, N., "Innovation and creativity in organizations : A state-of-the-science review, prospective commentary, and guiding framework", Journal of Management, 40(5), pp.1297~1333 (2014)[DOI]
  7. Bartram D., "The great eight competencies : A criterion-centric approach to validation", Journal of Applied Psychology, 90(6), pp.1185~1203 (2005)[DOI]
  8. Benedek, M., "Creativity myths : Prevalence and correlates of misconceptions on creativity", Personality and Individual Differences, 182 (2021)[DOI]
  9. Bonetto, E., "The paradox of creativity", New Ideas in Psychology, 60, pp.100820~ (2021)[DOI]
  10. Byrne, D., "The Attraction Paradigm" (1971), Academic Press
  11. Campion, M. A., "Doing competencies well : Best practices in competency modeling", Personnel Psychology, 64(1), pp.225~262 (2011)[DOI]
  12. Dacey, J. S., "Understanding creativity: The interplay of biological, psychological, and social factors" (1998), Jossey-Bass
  13. Diliello, T. C., "Narrowing the creativity gap : The moderating effects of perceived support for creativity", Journal of Psychology, 145(3), pp.151~172 (2011)[DOI]
  14. "The social enterprise at work: Paradox as a path forward" (2020)[URL]
  15. Domino, G., "Identification of potentially creative persons from the adjective check list", Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 35(1), pp.48~51 (1970)[DOI]
  16. Dweck, C., "A social-cognitive approach to motivation and personality", Psychological Review, 95(2), pp.256~273 (1988)[DOI]
  17. Eidelman, S., "Bias in favor of the status quo", Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 6(3), pp.270~281 (2012)[DOI]
  18. Epitropaki, O., "Creative Leadership", pp.39~56 (2018), Routledge
  19. Feist, G. J., "A meta-analysis of personality in scientific and artistic creativity", Personality and Social Psychology Review, 2(4), pp.290~309 (1998)[DOI]
  20. George, J. M., "Creativity in organizations", Academy of Management Annals, 1(1), pp.439~477 (2007)[DOI]
  21. George, J. M., "When openness to experience and conscientiousness are related to creative behavior : an interactional approach", Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(3), pp.513~524 (2001)[DOI]
  22. Gilson, L. L., "Radical and Incremental Creativity: Antecedents and processes", Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 5(1), pp.21~28 (2011)[DOI]
  23. Grant, A. M., "The necessity of others is the mother of invention : Intrinsic and prosocial motivations, perspective taking, and creativity", Academy of Management Journal, 54(1), pp.73~96 (2011)[DOI]
  24. Harrison, S. H., "The turn toward creative work", Academy of Management Collections, 1(1), pp.1~15 (2022)[DOI]
  25. Hunter, S. T., "Climate for creativity : A quantitative review", Creativity Research Journal, 19(1), pp.69~90 (2007)[DOI]
  26. Karwowski, M., "Creative mindsets:Measurement, correlates, consequences", Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 8(1), pp.62~70 (2014)[DOI]
  27. Karwowski, M., "The creative student in the eyes of a teacher : A cross-cultural study", Thinking Skills and Creativity, 35, pp.100636~ (2020)[DOI]
  28. Karwowski, M., "Exploring creative mindsets:Variable and person-centered approaches", Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 13(1), pp.36~48 (2019)[DOI]
  29. Kaufman, J. C., "Creativity 101" (2016), Springer publishing company
  30. Kaufman, J. C., "Insane, poetic, lovable: Creativity and endorsement of the “Mad Genius” stereotype", Imagination, Cognition and Personality, 26(1), pp.149~161 (2006)[DOI]
  31. Kettler, T., "Teachers’ perceptions of creativity in the classroom", Creativity Research Journal, 30(2), pp.164~171 (2018)[DOI]
  32. Lee, Y. S., "Why reject creative ideas? Fear as a driver of implicit bias against creativity", Creativity Research Journal, 29(3), pp.225~235 (2017)[DOI]
  33. Licuanan, B. F., "Idea evaluation : Error in evaluating highly original ideas", Journal of Creative Behavior, 41(1), pp.1~27 (2007)[DOI]
  34. MacKinnon, D. W., "The study of lives", pp.251~278 (1963), Atherton
  35. Madjar, N., "There’s no place like home? The contributions of work and nonwork creativity support to employees’ creative performance", Academy of Management Journal, 45(4), pp.757~767 (2002)[DOI]
  36. Miron-Spektor, E., "Handbook of organizational paradox: Approaches to plurality, tensions and contradictions", pp.434~451 (2017), Oxford University Press
  37. Mueller, J. S., "Recognizing creative leadership: Can creative idea expression negatively relate to perceptions of leadership potential?", Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47(2), pp.494~498 (2011)[DOI]
  38. Mueller, J. S., "The bias against creativity : Why people desire but reject creative ideas", Psychological Science, 23(1), pp.13~17 (2012)[DOI]
  39. Mueller, J. S., "Construing creativity : The how and why of recognizing creative ideas", Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 51, pp.81~87 (2014)[DOI]
  40. Mueller, J., "Reframing the decision-makers’dilemma : Towards a social context model of creative idea recognition", Academy of Management Journal, 61(1), pp.94~110 (2018)[DOI]
  41. Podsakoff, P. M., "Sources of method bias in social science research and recommendations on how to control it", Annual Review of Psychology, 63(1), pp.539~569 (2012)[DOI]
  42. Pretz, J. E., "The creative self: Effects of self-efficacy, mindset and identity", pp.155~170 (2017)
  43. Proctor, R., "Measuring cognitive and dispositional characteristics of creativity in elementary students", Creativity Research Journal, 16(4), pp.421~429 (2004)[DOI]
  44. Runco, M. A., "Creativity:From potential to realization", pp.21~30 (2004), American Psychological Association
  45. Runco, M. A., "Nurturing creativity in the classroom", pp.235~251 (2010), Cambridge Press
  46. Sawyer, R. K., "Explaining creativity: The science of human innovation" (2012), Oxford University Press
  47. Shalley, C. E., "The effects of personal and contextual characteristics on creativity : Where should we go from here?", Journal of Management, 30(6), pp.933~958 (2004)[DOI]
  48. Staw, B. M., "Creative action in organizations: Ivory tower visions and real world voices", pp.161~166 (1995), Sage
  49. Steiger, J. H., "Tests for comparing elements of a correlation matrix", Psychological Bulletin, 87(2), pp.245~251 (1980)[DOI]
  50. Sternberg, R. J., "Research in Multi-Level Issues:Volume IV", pp.93~104 (2005), Elsevier
  51. Sternberg, R. J., "Are cognitive styles still in style?", American Psychologist, 52(7), pp.700~712 (1997)[DOI]
  52. Sternberg, R. J., "Investing in creativity", American Psychologist, 51(7), pp.677~688 (1996)[DOI]
  53. Torrance, E. P., "Why fly? A philosophy of creativity" (1995), Ablex
  54. Westby, E. L., "Creativity:Asset or burden in the classroom?", Creativity Research Journal, 8(1), pp.1~10 (1995)[DOI]
  55. "The Future of Jobs Report 2020" (2020)[URL]
  56. Yuan, F., "The multiple ways of behaving creatively in the workplace : a typology and model", Journal of Organizational Behavior, 42(1), pp.20~33 (2021)[DOI]
  57. Zhou, J., "Workplace creativity : A review and redirection", Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 1(1), pp.333~359 (2014)[DOI]

관련 논문AI추천

학생의 과학성취수준이 학생 아이디어에 대한 예비교사의 창의성 평가에 미치는 영향: 창의성장 마인드셋의 조절효과부은주, 신종호한국창의력교육학회 · 창의력교육연구2022 · 제22권 제1호한국 성인들의 창의성 신화에 대한 믿음 및 관련 변인 탐색김 소정, 서 희영, 장재윤한국심리학회 · 한국심리학회지:일반2023 · 제42권 제2호교사가 인식한 창의적 학생의 특성이 학생에 대한 교사 반응에 미치는 영향이빈, 김진우, 이선영한국창의력교육학회 · 창의력교육연구2022 · 제22권 제3호문화적 성향과 창의적 마인드셋이 자기보고식 창의성 검사에 미치는 영향표정민한국창의력교육학회 · 창의력교육연구2018 · 제18권 제1호Bifactor 구조모형으로 검증한 창의성의 일반성과 영역특수성, 그리고 창의적 마인드셋과의 관계권유선, 안동근, 이희현, 표정민한국창의력교육학회 · 창의력교육연구2018 · 제18권 제1호학교조직의 지각된 창의적 환경과 창의성김혜숙한국창의력교육학회 · 창의력교육연구2012 · 제12권 제2호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (7건)

팀 기반 공유 리더십 척도의 타당화 연구주영경, 김명소pp. 439-470지각된 과잉자격과 상대적 박탈감이 지식은폐 동기에 미치는 영향: 일의 의미의 조절된 매개효과유태용, 김영일pp. 471-500도전적·방해적 스트레스원이 직무열의를 통해 조직시민행동에 미치는 차별적 영향김희진, 박형인pp. 501-526유자녀 직장인의 부부 친밀감과 일-가정 갈등 관계: 직무 만족과 직업역할 중요도의 조절된 매개모형박정현, 이기학pp. 527-555다차원적 조용한 사직 척도(MQQS) 타당화 연구김광태, 손영우, 이혜원pp. 557-583
원문 보기