조선 변경정책의 허와 실 ― 두만강 유역 女眞 藩胡의 성장과 발전 ―
Weakness and firmness of Frontier policy in Joseon:Growth and development of Boundary Jurchens(藩胡) of Jurchen(女眞) in Tumen River basin
0
조회
0
다운로드
13
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
In reign of Sejong in Joseon, Six Jin(六鎭) were formed in Tumen River basin and then, Fence(藩籬) of Jurchen which can be 'fence of a nation' was constructed. Fence of Jurchen was called as Boundary Jurchens(藩胡). Here, the study found out concept of Beon(藩, 蕃) and character of construction of Fence of Jurchen in Joseon and tried to investigate two aspects of Frontier policy related to Jurchen in Tumen River basin in Joseon through growth and development of Boundary Jurchens of Jurchen. Beon was used as the meaning of Fence of emperor. This is closely related to situation of China as a nation of emperor where China has political and diplomatic relationship with foreign country, vassal, and feudal lords. This appears formation of relationship of tribute and installation in the systematic aspect. In the aspect of ceremony, this appears as courtesy for guest related to exchange of envoy and banquet ceremony. In Goryeo, Jurchen people were called as Beonin(蕃人). This is concept related to political society which was subject to Goryeo and was closely related to visit to Goryeo by Jurchen envoy. Beon in Joseon is also persons 'who followed order centered on Joseon, influenced by virtues of Joseon or who should follow order centered on Joseon in the future'. To this end, visit of Fence on winter solstice and the New year became a ceremony in Joseon so that tribute relationship was formed. As Hoesa(回賜) and Sajak(賜爵) according to tribute were carried out, 'Beon' centered on Joseon was formed. In the end, tribute relationship between Joseon and Fence in ceremonial aspect is same as the form of relationship between Ming dynasty and Joseon as emperor and vassal(封臣) respectively. The objects were Jurchen people in Tumen River basin and Japanese people in Tsushima Island. Especially, recognition on Fence about Jurchen people in Tumen River basin clearly appeared in the reign of Sejong when Six Jin were formed. This shows that even in the international order in the Eastern Asia centered on Ming, Joseon showed independent view of world and a phase of construction of world order by Joseon. On the other hand, Fence of Jurchen and Boundary Jurchens began to be formed in Tumen River basin by Frontier policy in Joseon. And among Jurchen people, some were appealing to be Fence of Joseon in the Yalu River basin. Joseon was opposed to formation of Jurchen Fence in the Yalu River basin because Joseon was alert to danger caused by prosperity of neighboring other races, raising example of prosperity of Japanese people in three areas(三浦). But worry of Joseon became reality in Tumen River basin where Fence was already formed, not in the Yalu River basin. As Jurchen Fence in Tumen River basin became prosperous and grew, they began to leave the order centered on Joseon. Fence of Jurchen and Boundary Jurchens in Tumen River basin made rapid development within some 130 years after construction of Five Jin(五鎭) in the midst of protection through Frontier policy in Joseon. Development of Boundary Jurchens of Jurchen and expansion of trade with Joseon brought severe outflow of human and physical resources. And military officers of Joseon in outer area led trade of fur forcefully though they protect Boundary Jurchens of Jurchen, which made Boundary Jurchens resent the military officers. In the end, growth of Boundary Jurchens of Jurchen and disarray in management of Boundary Jurchens by Joseon caused rebellion of Boundary Jurchens. Rather, this first defensive line threatened Joseon. Joseon responded to their rebellion through conquer in the level of punishment but their rebellion became more severe. Joseon called Boundary Jurchens who betrayed Joseon or invaded frontier as Jurchen betrayal(叛胡). They were persons who were once subject to Joseon but left international order centered on Joseon later. However, rebellion of Boundary Jurchens was caused by Frontier policy in Joseon. And policy of Joseon to construct Fence unavoidably had two aspects of formation of defensive line of Joseon and growth of Jurchen.
Abstract
In reign of Sejong in Joseon, Six Jin(六鎭) were formed in Tumen River basin and then, Fence(藩籬) of Jurchen which can be 'fence of a nation' was constructed. Fence of Jurchen was called as Boundary Jurchens(藩胡). Here, the study found out concept of Beon(藩, 蕃) and character of construction of Fence of Jurchen in Joseon and tried to investigate two aspects of Frontier policy related to Jurchen in Tumen River basin in Joseon through growth and development of Boundary Jurchens of Jurchen. Beon was used as the meaning of Fence of emperor. This is closely related to situation of China as a nation of emperor where China has political and diplomatic relationship with foreign country, vassal, and feudal lords. This appears formation of relationship of tribute and installation in the systematic aspect. In the aspect of ceremony, this appears as courtesy for guest related to exchange of envoy and banquet ceremony. In Goryeo, Jurchen people were called as Beonin(蕃人). This is concept related to political society which was subject to Goryeo and was closely related to visit to Goryeo by Jurchen envoy. Beon in Joseon is also persons 'who followed order centered on Joseon, influenced by virtues of Joseon or who should follow order centered on Joseon in the future'. To this end, visit of Fence on winter solstice and the New year became a ceremony in Joseon so that tribute relationship was formed. As Hoesa(回賜) and Sajak(賜爵) according to tribute were carried out, 'Beon' centered on Joseon was formed. In the end, tribute relationship between Joseon and Fence in ceremonial aspect is same as the form of relationship between Ming dynasty and Joseon as emperor and vassal(封臣) respectively. The objects were Jurchen people in Tumen River basin and Japanese people in Tsushima Island. Especially, recognition on Fence about Jurchen people in Tumen River basin clearly appeared in the reign of Sejong when Six Jin were formed. This shows that even in the international order in the Eastern Asia centered on Ming, Joseon showed independent view of world and a phase of construction of world order by Joseon. On the other hand, Fence of Jurchen and Boundary Jurchens began to be formed in Tumen River basin by Frontier policy in Joseon. And among Jurchen people, some were appealing to be Fence of Joseon in the Yalu River basin. Joseon was opposed to formation of Jurchen Fence in the Yalu River basin because Joseon was alert to danger caused by prosperity of neighboring other races, raising example of prosperity of Japanese people in three areas(三浦). But worry of Joseon became reality in Tumen River basin where Fence was already formed, not in the Yalu River basin. As Jurchen Fence in Tumen River basin became prosperous and grew, they began to leave the order centered on Joseon. Fence of Jurchen and Boundary Jurchens in Tumen River basin made rapid development within some 130 years after construction of Five Jin(五鎭) in the midst of protection through Frontier policy in Joseon. Development of Boundary Jurchens of Jurchen and expansion of trade with Joseon brought severe outflow of human and physical resources. And military officers of Joseon in outer area led trade of fur forcefully though they protect Boundary Jurchens of Jurchen, which made Boundary Jurchens resent the military officers. In the end, growth of Boundary Jurchens of Jurchen and disarray in management of Boundary Jurchens by Joseon caused rebellion of Boundary Jurchens. Rather, this first defensive line threatened Joseon. Joseon responded to their rebellion through conquer in the level of punishment but their rebellion became more severe. Joseon called Boundary Jurchens who betrayed Joseon or invaded frontier as Jurchen betrayal(叛胡). They were persons who were once subject to Joseon but left international order centered on Joseon later. However, rebellion of Boundary Jurchens was caused by Frontier policy in Joseon. And policy of Joseon to construct Fence unavoidably had two aspects of formation of defensive line of Joseon and growth of Jurchen.
참고문헌 (21)
- "태종실록, 세종실록, 세조실록, 성종실록, 연산군일기, 중종실록, 명종실록, 선조실록, 선조수정실록(이상 조선왕조실록)", ~
- 金九鎭, "13C~17C女眞 社會의 硏究: 金 滅亡 以後 淸 建國 以前까지 女眞社會의 組織을 中心으로", 박사, 사학, pp.1988
- 남의현, "明代遼東支配政策硏究" (2008), 강원대학교출판부
- 박정민, "조선시대 여진인 내조 연구", 박사, 사학과, pp.2014
- 서병국, "宣祖時代 女眞交涉史 硏究" (1970), 교문사
- 한성주, "조선전기 수직여진인 연구" (2011), 경인문화사
- 김구진, "여진과의 관계", 한국사, 22 (1995), 국사편찬위원회
- 김구진, "국역제승방략" (1999), 세종대왕사업회
- 김남규, "高麗前期의 女眞觀-女眞懷柔政策과 관련하여", 가라문화, 12 (1995)
- 김순남, "16세기 조선과 野人 사이의 모피 교역의 전개", 한국사연구, (152), pp.71~108 (2011), 한국사연구회
- 김순남, "조선 燕山君代 여진의 동향과 대책", 한국사연구, (144), pp.127~163 (2009), 한국사연구회
- 김순남, "조선전기 5진 藩胡 동향의 추이", 역사와 실학, (46), pp.71~101 (2011), 역사실학회
- 박정민, "조선 세조대 여진인 來朝와 귀속문제", 전북사학, (41), pp.77~116 (2012), 전북사학회
- 박정민, "조선 세종대 여진인 통교체제의 정비", 한국사연구, (163), pp.189~220 (2013), 한국사연구회
- 유재춘, "朝鮮前期 行城築造에 관하여", 강원사학, 13 (1998)
- 전해종, "歷史와 文化-韓國과 中國ㆍ日本" (1976), 일조각
- 정다함, "朝鮮初期 野人과 對馬島에 대한 藩籬 · 藩屛 認識의 형성과 敬差官의 파견", 동방학지, (141), pp.221~266 (2008), 국학연구원
- 추명엽, "고려전기 ‘번(蕃)’ 인식과 ‘동ㆍ서번’의 형성", 역사와 현실, 43 (2002)
- 한문종, "朝鮮前期의 對馬島 敬差官", 전북사학, 15 (1992)
- 한성주, "朝鮮前期 ‘字小’에 대한 고찰-對馬島 倭人 및 女眞 勢力을 중심으로-", 한일관계사연구, (33), pp.203~236 (2009), 한일관계사학회
- 한성주, "조선전기 두만강유역 ‘女眞 藩籬ㆍ藩胡’의 형성과 성격", 한국사학보, 41 (2010)
