본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

苗糧에서 苗牆으로 ― 明代 後期 苗族의 저항과 明朝의 대책 ―

From Miaoliang to Miaoqiang — The Resistance of Miao and the measures of Dynasty in the Late Ming China —

0

조회

0

다운로드

6

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류역사학

초록

Miaojiang, or Miao territory, the borderland of Hunan and Guizhou, was in chaos, intertwined with plunder, kidnapping, and revolt in the late Ming China. The trouble began with the increase of immigration of Han Chinese to this region from the end of fifteenth century. They encroached the land of Miao, the indigenous people, using the advanced method of farming, practiced usury after accumulating funds with business, or caused harm between the local authority and the Miao. Facing the crisis of survival, the resistance of Miao broke out. The resistance of Miao had already begun, of course, with the Ming power entering this region in the latter part of fourteenth century. However, the resistance of this time was characterized by its different nature resulting from new circumstances of many immigrants of civil Han Chinese. Anyway it was never easy for Ming to suppress and subjugate them. In the beginning, Ming authority used military power with conciliatory policy, but after the middle period of Ming dynasty the policy was closer to the latter, of which the provision of Miaoliang (the grain of Miao) was representative. But the provision was abused by both the officers of guard bases and the Miao. In order to resolve the problem, Ming authority took the segregation policy, that is Miaoqiang (Miao Wall). This decision was due to the situation of the region which contained not only the conflict of Miao and Han Chinese but another complex problems, for example, the ambivalent attitude of Tusi, native chieftains, between the Ming authority and the rebel forces of Miao, the collusion of officers of guard bases and Miao, and the problem of nebulous identity of Shu Miao, or Cooked Miao, etc.. Miaoqiang policy can be called the cutting the Gordian knot, but could not solve the problem definitely. Harmed by the segregation, the Miao attacked the wall continually, just in time taking advantage of the occurrence of enormous rebellions in Guizhou and subsequently in another province of China. Eventually the wall was destroyed in a little more than ten years. A reviewer in the Qing period criticized the policy of segregation and expressed the regret of their not having used the coexistence policy by aiding poor Miao. One of the root cause of incessant rising of disturbance and revolt of the Miao was also the matter of bread and butter.

Abstract

Miaojiang, or Miao territory, the borderland of Hunan and Guizhou, was in chaos, intertwined with plunder, kidnapping, and revolt in the late Ming China. The trouble began with the increase of immigration of Han Chinese to this region from the end of fifteenth century. They encroached the land of Miao, the indigenous people, using the advanced method of farming, practiced usury after accumulating funds with business, or caused harm between the local authority and the Miao. Facing the crisis of survival, the resistance of Miao broke out. The resistance of Miao had already begun, of course, with the Ming power entering this region in the latter part of fourteenth century. However, the resistance of this time was characterized by its different nature resulting from new circumstances of many immigrants of civil Han Chinese. Anyway it was never easy for Ming to suppress and subjugate them. In the beginning, Ming authority used military power with conciliatory policy, but after the middle period of Ming dynasty the policy was closer to the latter, of which the provision of Miaoliang (the grain of Miao) was representative. But the provision was abused by both the officers of guard bases and the Miao. In order to resolve the problem, Ming authority took the segregation policy, that is Miaoqiang (Miao Wall). This decision was due to the situation of the region which contained not only the conflict of Miao and Han Chinese but another complex problems, for example, the ambivalent attitude of Tusi, native chieftains, between the Ming authority and the rebel forces of Miao, the collusion of officers of guard bases and Miao, and the problem of nebulous identity of Shu Miao, or Cooked Miao, etc.. Miaoqiang policy can be called the cutting the Gordian knot, but could not solve the problem definitely. Harmed by the segregation, the Miao attacked the wall continually, just in time taking advantage of the occurrence of enormous rebellions in Guizhou and subsequently in another province of China. Eventually the wall was destroyed in a little more than ten years. A reviewer in the Qing period criticized the policy of segregation and expressed the regret of their not having used the coexistence policy by aiding poor Miao. One of the root cause of incessant rising of disturbance and revolt of the Miao was also the matter of bread and butter.

참고문헌 (54)

  1. "明實錄", ~
  2. "明史", ~
  3. "皇明經世文編", ~
  4. 秦金, "安楚錄", 續修四庫全書, ~
  5. 江東之, "瑞陽阿集", 四庫全書存目叢書, ~
  6. 張岳, "小山類稿" (2000), 福建人民出版社
  7. 蔡復一, "遯菴全集", 四庫禁毁書叢刊, ~
  8. 段汝霖, "楚南苗志", 四庫全書存目叢書, ~
  9. 査繼佐, "罪惟錄" (1986), 浙江古籍出版社
  10. 田汝成, "炎徼紀聞", ~
  11. 顧炎武, "天下郡國利病書", ~
  12. 嚴如熤, "苗防備覽", ~
  13. 光緖, "湖南通志", ~
  14. 嘉靖, "思南府志", ~
  15. 道光, "思南府續志", ~
  16. 康熙, "思州府志", ~
  17. 乾隆, "辰州府志", ~
  18. 道光, "鳳凰廳志", ~
  19. 乾隆, "永順縣志", ~
  20. 同治, "永順府志", ~
  21. 同治, "酉陽直隸州總志", ~
  22. 光緖, "古丈坪廳志", ~
  23. "民國「銅仁府志」", ~
  24. 동북아역사재단, "明史 外國傳 譯註 6, 土司傳 中" (2014), 동북아역사재단
  25. 클로딘 롱바르 살몽, "중국적 문화변용의 한 예 : 18세기 귀주성" (2015), 세창출판사
  26. 凌純聲, "湘西苗族調査報告" (1947), 商務印書館
  27. 佘貽澤, "明代土司制度" (1968), 臺灣學生書局
  28. 梁方仲, "中國歷代戶口ㆍ田地ㆍ田賦統計" (1980), 上海人民出版社
  29. 譚其驤, "中國歷史地圖集" (1982), 中國地圖出版社
  30. 伍新福, "苗族史" (1992), 四川民族出版社
  31. 龔蔭, "中國土司制度" (1992), 雲南民族出版社
  32. 楊紹猷, "明代民族史" (1996), 四川民族出版社
  33. 曹樹基, "中國移民史 第5卷" (1997), 福建人民出版社
  34. 田玉隆, "貴州土司史" (2006), 貴州人民出版社
  35. 吳榮臻, "苗族通史" (2007), 民族出版社
  36. 張中奎, "改土歸流與苗疆再造" (2012), 中國社會科學出版社
  37. H. J. Wiens, "China's March toward the Tropics" (1967), The Shoe String Press
  38. R.D. Jenks, "Insurgency and Social Disorder in Guizhou, The Miao Rebellion, 1854-1873" (1994), University of Hawaii Press
  39. Leo K. Shin, "The making of the Chinese State: Ethnicity and Expansion on the Ming Borderlands" (2006), Cambridge University Press
  40. J.E. Herman, "Amid the clouds and mist: China's colonization of Guizhou, 1200-1700" (2007), Harvard University Press
  41. 石邦彦, "苗疆邊墻試析", 吉首大學學報(社會科學), 11(1) (1990)
  42. 吳曦云, "邊墻與湘西苗疆", 中南民族學院學報(哲學社會科學版), (6) (1993)
  43. 張應强, "邊墻興廢與明淸苗疆社會", 中山大學學報(社會科學版), (2) (2001)
  44. 伍新福, "明代湘黔邊“苗疆”“堡哨”“邊墻”考", 貴州民族硏究, (3) (2001)
  45. 伍新福, "明代湘黔邊“苗疆”“堡哨”“邊墻”考", 中南民族大學學報(人文社會科學版), 23(2) (2003)
  46. 郭紅, "明代衛所移民與地域文化的變遷", 中國歷史地理論叢, 18(2) (2003)
  47. 羅康智, "論明代“理苗”之失", 吉首大學學報(社會科學版), 28(4) (2007)
  48. 鄒珺, "湘西明淸邊墻的修築及其歷史價値", 懷化學院學報, 26(10) (2007)
  49. 陳曦, "明淸時期湘西苗族起義頻繁發生的原因述論", 廣東技術師範學院學報(社會科學), (4) (2011)
  50. 張振興, "從哨堡到邊墻: 明代對湘西苗疆治策的演遞 ― 兼論明代治苗與土司制度的關係", 吉首大學學報(社會科學版), 35(2) (2014)
  51. 川勝守, "星博士退官記念中國史論集" (1978), 山形
  52. 谷口規矩雄, "明末淸初の社會と文化" (1996)
  53. 미치우에 타카푸미, "明代の「南方長城」について -苗疆邊墻の成立とその背景-", 중국사연구, (62), pp.115~135 (2009), 중국사학회
  54. 吉開將人, "苗族史の近代)(1)∼(7)", 北海道大學文學硏究科紀要, 124(134) (2008)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (13건)