인도양 무역 네트워크와 문명 공간 ― 西海, 西洋, 그리고 西域의 개념을 중심으로 ―
The Indian Ocean trade network and a civilization space — Centered on the concepts of 西海(xihai), 西洋(xiyang) and 西域(xiyu) —
0
조회
0
다운로드
7
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This study speculated on the world of the Indian Ocean through terms of 西海(xihai), 西洋(xiyang) and 西域(xiyu). Originally, 西海(xihai) was a term with directionality based on Chinese world view, but it indicates the Mediterranean Sea, the Arabian Sea and the Red Sea as physical space along with cultivation of Silk Road on land. The Indian Ocean was recognized as 西海(xihai) or 西南海(xinanhai) in the Song and Yuan periods. the concept of 서양 has directionality starting from the coastal waters of Fujian and Guangdong, but the concepts of the east and the west that was examined from 『南海志』 published in 大德 years indicate the range central port cities had influence on and is spacial as it covers even religious and ethnic conflicts and cooperation. That is, 西洋(xiyang) indicates the Indian Ocean, but it also means a trade network in this area. The term of 西域(xiyu) is related to appearance of large historical stage. The Islam that began to grow through the Middle Ages was a center of wide historical stage over Europe and Asia under Mongol Empire. The Indian Ocean network was expanded inland and a key factor when it connected different civilizations was reciprocal trade. The Indian Ocean network connected local products each subcategory wanted to import. In particular, cotton which was produced in India was spread over each civilization through trade via the Indian Ocean network. 西域(xiyu) was a wide economic area where different civilizations were linked to guaranty reciprocal trade, not an east-west passage. The Indian Ocean network covered the Arabian Ocean along the western and southern coast of India and connected the Mediterranean Sea and the Red Sea on land via the Persian Gulf. It connected to the Arabian Ocean along the eastern sea of Africa, which formed a big link. Local products from East Asian products via large and small islands on the Indian Ocean, India, Java and Srivijaya empire were accumulated on this central link. It also connected Arabia, Asia Minor, the western and northern area of Africa, Iberia, India, West India and Yunnan civilizations. Port cities of each civilization were converged in a big link of the Indian Ocean while leading area of subcategories by connecting hinterlands. The term of 西洋(xiyang) was used when Chinese people explored such Indian trade networks and joined in them through the oceans. Important passages to the Indian Ocean were Guang-zhou and Ch'uan-zhou. They developed greatly as big cities that had China and East Asia as hinterlands.
Abstract
This study speculated on the world of the Indian Ocean through terms of 西海(xihai), 西洋(xiyang) and 西域(xiyu). Originally, 西海(xihai) was a term with directionality based on Chinese world view, but it indicates the Mediterranean Sea, the Arabian Sea and the Red Sea as physical space along with cultivation of Silk Road on land. The Indian Ocean was recognized as 西海(xihai) or 西南海(xinanhai) in the Song and Yuan periods. the concept of 서양 has directionality starting from the coastal waters of Fujian and Guangdong, but the concepts of the east and the west that was examined from 『南海志』 published in 大德 years indicate the range central port cities had influence on and is spacial as it covers even religious and ethnic conflicts and cooperation. That is, 西洋(xiyang) indicates the Indian Ocean, but it also means a trade network in this area. The term of 西域(xiyu) is related to appearance of large historical stage. The Islam that began to grow through the Middle Ages was a center of wide historical stage over Europe and Asia under Mongol Empire. The Indian Ocean network was expanded inland and a key factor when it connected different civilizations was reciprocal trade. The Indian Ocean network connected local products each subcategory wanted to import. In particular, cotton which was produced in India was spread over each civilization through trade via the Indian Ocean network. 西域(xiyu) was a wide economic area where different civilizations were linked to guaranty reciprocal trade, not an east-west passage. The Indian Ocean network covered the Arabian Ocean along the western and southern coast of India and connected the Mediterranean Sea and the Red Sea on land via the Persian Gulf. It connected to the Arabian Ocean along the eastern sea of Africa, which formed a big link. Local products from East Asian products via large and small islands on the Indian Ocean, India, Java and Srivijaya empire were accumulated on this central link. It also connected Arabia, Asia Minor, the western and northern area of Africa, Iberia, India, West India and Yunnan civilizations. Port cities of each civilization were converged in a big link of the Indian Ocean while leading area of subcategories by connecting hinterlands. The term of 西洋(xiyang) was used when Chinese people explored such Indian trade networks and joined in them through the oceans. Important passages to the Indian Ocean were Guang-zhou and Ch'uan-zhou. They developed greatly as big cities that had China and East Asia as hinterlands.
참고문헌 (70)
- 荀況, "文淵閣四庫全書 695" (1988), 商務印書館
- 劉熙, "釋名" (1970), 育民出版社
- 司馬遷, "史記", 文淵閣四庫全書, ~
- 郭璞, "續修四庫全書 185" (1985), 上海古籍出版社
- 張華, "博物志", 文淵閣四庫全書, ~
- 酈道元, "水經注", 文淵閣四庫全書, ~
- 李延夀, "南史", 文淵閣四庫全書, ~
- 杜佑, "通典", 文淵閣四庫全, ~
- 歐陽修, "新唐書 (二十四史全譯)" (2004), 漢語大詞典出版社
- 李昉, "太平御覽", 文淵閣四庫全書, ~
- 釋志磐, "佛祖統紀", 續修四庫全書, ~
- 周去非, "叢書集成初編 3119" (1985), 中華書局
- 劉敏中, "中菴集", 文淵閣四庫全書, ~
- 謝應芳, "龜巢稿", 文淵閣四庫全書, ~
- 王大淵, "島夷志略", 文淵閣四庫全書, ~
- 周致中, "異域志", 叢書集成初編, ~
- 陳大震, "宋元方志叢刊 8" (1990), 中華書局
- 戴重, "河村集", 四庫禁燬書叢刋, ~
- 羅懋登, "新刻全像三寶太監西洋記通俗演義" (1995), 上海古籍出版社
- 劉若愚, "酌中志", 叢書集成初編, ~
- 馬歡, "瀛涯勝覽", 叢書集成初編, ~
- 徐應秋, "玉芝堂談薈", 文淵閣四庫全書, ~
- 章潢, "圖書編", 文淵閣四庫全書, ~
- 傅維鱗, "明書", 文淵閣四庫全書, ~
- 夏燮, "明通鑒", 續修四庫全書, ~
- 汪大淵, "中外交通史籍叢刊" (1981), 中華書國
- 楊武泉, "中外交通史籍叢刊" (1981), 中華書國
- 楊博文, "中外交通史籍叢刊" (1981), 中華書國
- 岑麒祥, "漢語外來語詞典" (1990), 商務印書館
- 陳佳榮, "古代南海地名彙釋" (1986), 中華書局
- 티모시 브룩, "베르메르의 모자" (2008), 추수밭
- 하네다 마사시, "동인도회사와 아시아의 바다" (2012), 선인
- 주경철, "대항해시대" (2008), 서울대학교출판부
- 조동일, "동아시아문명론" (2010), 지식산업사
- 프랑수아 지푸르, "아시아지중해" (2014), 선인
- 재닛 아부-루고드, "유럽 패권 이전: 13세기 세계체제" (2006), 까치글방
- 쵸두리, "유럽이전의 아시아" (2011), 심산
- 2010, , ~
- 최병욱, "동남아시아사-전통시대(개정판)" (2015), 산인
- 張星烺, "中西交通史料彙編 二冊" (1977), 중화서국
- 川勝平太, "文明の海洋史觀" (2016), 中央公論新社
- 馮承鈞, "中國南洋交通史" (1984), 上海書店
- 陳高華, "陳高華文集" (2005), 上海譯文出版社
- 泉州國際學術討論會組織委員會, "中國與海上絲綢之路" (1990), 福建人民出版社
- 南京鄭和硏究會, "走向海洋的中國人" (1996), 海潮出版社
- George Hourani, "Arab Seafaring: Inthe Indian Ocien in Anceint and Early Medieval Times" (1995), Princeton University Press
- 송정수, "‘三立三絶’을 통해서 본 明朝의 하미(Hami) 지배의 變化像", 명청사연구, (45), pp.1~36 (2016), 명청사학회
- 이수열, "가와카츠 헤이타(川勝平太)의 해양아시아사", 해항도시문화교섭학, (10), pp.135~154 (2014), 국제해양문제연구소
- 최소자, "17ㆍ18 세기의 중국의 對西洋觀 -淸實錄을 중심으로-", 東洋史學硏究, 7 (1974)
- 최소자, "중국에서 본 서양", 東洋史學硏究, 80 (2002)
- 하세봉, "새로운 상상의 가능성: 해양사 연구", 역사와경계, (101), pp.1~31 (2016), 부산경남사학회
- 宮畸市定, "南洋を東西洋に分つ根據に就いて", 東洋史研究, 7(4) (1942)
- 劉銘恕, "鄭和航海事跡之再探", 中國文化研究彙刊, 3 (1943), 金陵齊魯華西三大學
- 劉迎勝, "走向海洋的中國人" (1996), 海潮出版社
- 劉迎勝, "“鄭和與海洋”學術研討會論文集" (1998), 中國農業出版社
- 萬明, "釋‘西洋’-鄭和下西洋深遠影響的探析", 南洋問題研究, (4) (2004)
- 萬明, "從西域到西洋", 河北學刊, (1) (2005)
- 山本達郎, "東西洋といふ稱呼の起源に就いて", 東洋學報, 21(1) (1933)
- 王元林, "古代早期的中國南海與西海的地理概念", 西域研究, (1) (2006)
- 周運中, "元明時期中國與馬八兒ㆍ瑣里交通史新考", 南亞硏究, (2) (2012)
- 陳佳榮, "走向海洋的中國人" (1996), 海潮出版社
- 陳宏, "‘西域’與‘西洋’—從哈密西關看「三寶太監西洋記通俗演義」的地理意識", 遼東學院學報(社會科學版), (5) (2015)
- 沈福偉, "鄭和下西洋論文集 第2集" (1985), 南京大學出版社
- 佟屏亞, "棉花的傳播史", 棉花, (5) (1978)
- 畢奧南, "歷史語境中的王朝中國疆域概念辨析—以天下ㆍ四海ㆍ中國ㆍ疆域ㆍ版圖爲例", 中國邊疆史地研究 (2006)
- 賀靈, "西域地名的文化意義", 西域研究 (2003)
- 洪建新, "鄭和下西洋論文集 第1集" (1985), 人民交通出版社
- Tansen Sen, "中印海上互動 : 宋至明初中國海上力量在印度洋沿岸的崛起", 復旦學報(社會科學版), (2) (2014)
- 黃啟臣, "論元代廣州的海外貿易", 淡江史學, (5) (1995)
- Angela Schottenhammer, "The Perception of Maritime Space in Traditional Chinese Sources, (East Asian Economic and Socio-cultural Studies:East Asian Maritime History 2)" (2006), Aarrassowitz Verlag