海澄에서 厦門으로 ― 16~17세기 복건 해외무역 창구의 변화 ―
From Haicheng to Xiamen — Transitions of Fujian overseas trade center from the 16th century to the 17th century —
0
조회
0
다운로드
8
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This paper traces the process of the conversion of overseas trade channels in the Fujian region from the end of the 16th century to the end of the 17th century, focusing on the political and economic background surrounding it. Haicheng(海澄) was the only official overseas trade port at the end of the Ming Dynasty. Xiamen(厦門) was also one of the four maritime ports established by the Qing Empire in implementing the open sea policy after conquering Taiwan. Related studies dealt with the two harbor cities with considerable weight as external channels for the two early modern empires, the Ming and the Qing. In most cases, however, each city was analyzed in its historical context as a separate issue. Most studies did not treat the two cities as a continuous relationship. The two harbor cities are geographically very close and capable of similar functions within the region. In short, they are replaceable to each other. In the early 17th century, Xiamen has taken the status of the main harbor of the region instead of Haicheng, but the explanation of the background dynamics is still insufficient. Anhai(安海) is less renowned than the before-mentioned two port cities. However, recent studies of the Zheng group revealed that the first leader, Zheng Zhi-long(鄭芝龍), operated an exclusive smuggling network centered on Anhai for decades since he surrendered to the Ming empire. As the Zheng group gained official power, Anhai took over the control of the trade network from Haicheng, the existing trade center, and functioned as a transitional center of the Fujian overseas trade network until the Zheng group moved to the new center, Xiamen. Therefore, to accurately understand the transition from Haicheng to Xiamen, it is necessary to understand the functions performed and the status enjoyed by Anhai. The change between the three port cities for 120 years can be said to be the product of conflict, compromise, and confrontation between continental and maritime forces over the unprecedented economic interest called ‘the expansion of global silver trade’. In simple terms, it was linked directly with the rise and fall of the Zheng group. The transition from Haicheng to Anhai occurred for the Zheng group was conceived in the aftermath of the confrontation between the Spain Empire and the VOC over East Asian seas to take over the trade network with China. The transition from Anhai to Xiamen occurred during the massive political event, called “the Ming-Qing transition.” The Xiamen trade system was built during the post-processing process after the Qing Empire eliminated the Zheng group of Taiwan.
Abstract
This paper traces the process of the conversion of overseas trade channels in the Fujian region from the end of the 16th century to the end of the 17th century, focusing on the political and economic background surrounding it. Haicheng(海澄) was the only official overseas trade port at the end of the Ming Dynasty. Xiamen(厦門) was also one of the four maritime ports established by the Qing Empire in implementing the open sea policy after conquering Taiwan. Related studies dealt with the two harbor cities with considerable weight as external channels for the two early modern empires, the Ming and the Qing. In most cases, however, each city was analyzed in its historical context as a separate issue. Most studies did not treat the two cities as a continuous relationship. The two harbor cities are geographically very close and capable of similar functions within the region. In short, they are replaceable to each other. In the early 17th century, Xiamen has taken the status of the main harbor of the region instead of Haicheng, but the explanation of the background dynamics is still insufficient. Anhai(安海) is less renowned than the before-mentioned two port cities. However, recent studies of the Zheng group revealed that the first leader, Zheng Zhi-long(鄭芝龍), operated an exclusive smuggling network centered on Anhai for decades since he surrendered to the Ming empire. As the Zheng group gained official power, Anhai took over the control of the trade network from Haicheng, the existing trade center, and functioned as a transitional center of the Fujian overseas trade network until the Zheng group moved to the new center, Xiamen. Therefore, to accurately understand the transition from Haicheng to Xiamen, it is necessary to understand the functions performed and the status enjoyed by Anhai. The change between the three port cities for 120 years can be said to be the product of conflict, compromise, and confrontation between continental and maritime forces over the unprecedented economic interest called ‘the expansion of global silver trade’. In simple terms, it was linked directly with the rise and fall of the Zheng group. The transition from Haicheng to Anhai occurred for the Zheng group was conceived in the aftermath of the confrontation between the Spain Empire and the VOC over East Asian seas to take over the trade network with China. The transition from Anhai to Xiamen occurred during the massive political event, called “the Ming-Qing transition.” The Xiamen trade system was built during the post-processing process after the Qing Empire eliminated the Zheng group of Taiwan.
참고문헌 (100)
- "明實錄", ~
- "淸實錄", ~
- "鄭氏史料初編", ~
- "臺灣鄭氏紀事", ~
- "臺灣外記", ~
- "海濱大事記", ~
- "明史", ~
- "東西洋考", ~
- "崇禎長編", ~
- "崇禎實錄", ~
- "靖海志", ~
- "靖海紀略", ~
- "明季北略", ~
- "臺灣鄭氏紀事", ~
- "明實錄閩海關係史料", ~
- "臺灣鄭氏始末", ~
- "天下郡國利病書", ~
- "倪文貞奏疏", ~
- "崇相集選錄", ~
- "臺灣割據志", ~
- "明季南略", ~
- "厦門志", ~
- "明季遺聞", ~
- "小腆紀年", ~
- "續明史紀事本末", ~
- "海東逸史", ~
- "鄭成功傳", ~
- "泉州府志選錄", ~
- "三藩紀事本末", ~
- "臺灣通紀", ~
- "明清史料", ~
- "淸經世文編", ~
- "康熙起居注", ~
- 程紹剛, "荷蘭人在福爾摩莎" (2000), 聯經出版事業公司
- 村上直次郞, "バタヴィア城日誌1" (1970), 平凡社
- 남민구, "1594년 福建巡撫 許孚遠의 呂宋 사신단 파견 ― ‘7명의 중국관원’ 파견의 전말 ―", 명청사연구, (54), pp.81~109 (2020), 명청사학회[DOI]
- 남민구, "萬曆연간 海澄縣 상선 징세와 그 배경", 동양사학연구, (149), pp.147~182 (2019), 동양사학회
- 元廷植, "淸初 福建社會와 遷界令 實施", 동양사학연구, 81, pp.2~78 (2003), 동양사학회
- 조영헌, "明 後期 月港 開港과 壬辰倭亂", 史叢(사총), (90), pp.83~126 (2017), 역사연구소[DOI]
- 채경수, "淸朝 臺灣 영유 결정의 해양사적 고찰 ― 明末 淸初 澎湖의 지정학적 위상 변화를 중심으로 ―", 명청사연구, (55), pp.111~151 (2021), 명청사학회
- 채경수, "鄭氏集團의 變貌와 淸朝의 對應", 동양사학연구, (157), pp.277~315 (2021), 동양사학회
- 채경수, "海澄 개항과 새로운 교역망의 형성", 명청사연구, (54), pp.39~79 (2020), 명청사학회[DOI]
- 채경수, "가정 말기 ‘새로운 왜구’의 등장과 명조 해방 정책의 변화", 동양사학연구, (149), pp.111~146 (2019), 동양사학회
- 채경수, "遷界令의 전략적 의미 재검토 ― 복건 연해 해상세력의 동향을 중심으로 ―", 명청사연구, (48), pp.75~113 (2017), 명청사학회[DOI]
- 티모시 브룩, "셀던의 중국지도-잃어버린 항해도, 향료 무역 그리고 남중국해" (2018), 너머북스
- 한지선, "嘉靖年間 東南沿海社會와 月港의 開放", 중국사연구, (90), pp.127~168 (2014), 중국사학회
- 한지선, "명대 해금정책 연구", 박사, 사학, pp.2009
- 古慧雯, "十七世紀荷日貿易中臺灣所扮演的角色", 經濟論文叢刊, 46(2) (2018)
- 邱普艷, "從道光『厦門志』看清朝前期的厦門海關", 中國地方志, (02) (2010)
- 南炳文, "南明史" (1992), 南開大學出版社
- 盧建一, "明淸海疆政策與東南海島硏究" (2011), 福建人民出版社
- 塗志偉, "大航海時代世界格局下月港地位的變遷", 閩商文化研究, (6) (2015)
- 萬明, "中國融入世界的步履 : 明與淸前期海外政策比較硏究" (2000), 社會科學文獻出版社
- 徐明德, "論明淸時期的對外交流與邊治" (2006), 浙江大學出版社
- 蘇惠蘋, "族譜所見明清時期中菲貿易的月港海商", 沈陽農業大學學報(社會科學版), (1) (2018)
- 蘇惠蘋, "海洋社會變遷下的福建官紳與海商-以高寀事件為中心的考察", 閩臺文化研究, (03) (2014)
- 楊國楨, "明淸中國沿海社會與海外移民" (1997), 高等敎育出版社
- 吳春明, "月港馬尼拉航路對中華文化史的貢獻", 南方文物, (3) (2019)
- 王日根, "海洋區域治理視域下的月港“二十四將”叛亂", 江海學刊, (5) (2012)
- 王日根, "明淸海疆政策與中國社會發展" (2005), 福建人民出版社
- 廖聲豐, "試論“一口通商”時期閩海關的商品流通", 江西財經大學學報, (02) (2010)
- 劉濤, "戴城改良的福船与大航海时代漳州月港发展考", 閩商文化研究, (1) (2019)
- 李金明, "明代海外貿易史" (1990), 中國社會科學院出版社
- 李慶新, "明代海外貿易制度" (2007), 社會科學文獻出版社
- 李東華, "泉州與我國中古的海上交通" (1986), 臺灣學生書局
- 李賢强, "明代福建月港“二十四將”叛亂與設縣問題再硏究", 中國邊疆史地硏究, 27(2) (2017)
- 任軍, "全球化視野下明代月港“走私”興起的社會學研究", 閩商文化研究, (6) (2015)
- 林耀卿, "漳州月港在古代海絲之路的曆史地位", 東方收藏, (6) (2018)
- 林仁川, "明末淸初私人海上貿易" (1987), 華東師範大學出版社
- 林仁川, "明代漳州海上貿易的發展與海商反對稅監高寀的斗爭", 厦門大學學報(哲學社會科學版), (03) (1982)
- 林惠玲, "月港時代漳州的國際化與地方化", 閩商文化研究, (6) (2015)
- 張桂林, "稅璫高寀亂閩述略", 福建師範大學學報(哲學社會科學版), (02) (1990)
- 張永欽, "論明代漳州月港在海內外貿易交流中的地位", 齊齊哈爾大學學報(哲學社會科學版), (1) (2019)
- 張靜, "清代前期閩海關的設置與福建沿海城市的興盛", 碩士, pp.2005
- 錢實甫, "淸代職官年表" (1980), 中華書局
- 鄭永常, "來自海洋的挑戰-明代海貿政策演變研究" (2004), 稻郷出版社
- 晁中辰, "明朝對外交流" (2015), 南京出版社
- 晁中辰, "明代海禁與海外貿易" (2005), 人民出版社
- 陳尙勝, "隆慶開海:明朝海外貿易政策的重大變革", 人民論壇, (3) (2018)
- 陳尙勝, "懷夷與抑商 : 明代海洋力量興衰硏究" (1997), 山東人民出版社
- 陳宗仁, "一六二二年前後荷蘭東印度公司有關東亞貿易策略的轉變-兼論荷蘭文獻中的Lamang傳聞", 臺灣歷史學報, (35) (2005)
- 陳希育, "清代前期的厦門海關與海外貿易", 厦門大學學報(哲學社會科學版), (03) (1991)
- 戚暢, "海禁與朝貢明朝官方海外貿易研究(1368-1567)", 碩士, pp.2012
- 許毅明, "閩海關(福建常關)歷史沿革初探", 海交史研究, (01) (1992)
- 許毅明, "泉州海關的設立及其歷史演變", 海交史研究, (01) (1988)
- 黃國盛, "清代閩海關沿革", 文史知識, (04) (1995)
- 黃友泉, "明代東南沿海士紳與海疆治理兼論明代月港部分開禁政策藍本的構畫", 中國海洋大學學報(社會科學版), (2) (2020)
- 木岡さやか, "明代海禁体制の再編と漳州月港の開港", 史窓, 64 (2007)
- 佐久間重男, "日明関係史の研究" (1992), 吉川弘文館
- 村井章介岩井正敏荒野泰典, "地球史的世界の成立" (2013), 吉川弘文館
- Cheng Wei-Chung, "War, Trade and Piracy in the China Seas 1622-1683" (2013), Brill
- Garret, Richard J., "The Defence of Macau: forts, ships and weapons over 450years" (2010), Hongkong University Press
- Giraldez, Arturo, "The Age of Trade" (2015), Rowman & Littlefield
- Hang, Xing, "Conflict and commerce in maritime East Asia: The Zheng family and the shaping of the modern world, c. 1620 1720" (2015), Cambridge University Press
- Li Kangying, "The Ming Maritime Trade Policy in Transition, 1368 to 1567" (2010), Harrassowitz
- Ng Chin-keong, "Trade and society, the Amoy network on the China Coast, 1683-1735" (2015), NUS Press
- Po, Ronald C, "The blue frontier : maritime vision and power in the Qing Empire" (2018), Cambridge University Press
- Ruurdje Laarhoven, "From Blockde to Trade : Early Dutch Relations with Manila, 1600-1750", Philippine Studies, 33 (1985)
- Tremml-Werner, "Birgit, Spain, China, and Japan in Manila, 1571-1644 : local comparisons and global connections" (2015), Amsterdam University Press
- Wills, John E. Jr., "China and Maritime Europe, 1500-1800 : Trade, Settlement, Diplomacy, and Missions" (2010), Cambridge University Press