본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

문장지 시절의 박태원 - 신체제 대응양상을 중심으로 -

Park Taewon's Literature Characteris- tics in Munjang Magazine(1939~1941); Focusing on the Response to the New Structure

3

조회

0

다운로드

8

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류한국어와문학

초록

By reviewing works of Munjang magazine(1939. 2~1941. 4) relatively less studied, this paper traces the change of Park Taewon's literary trends. First Park, in a novel <Golmok-an; inside of the alley>, made sharp criticism for the Act of the entrance system of middle school, announced August 31, 1939. The new Act for collecting students included a physical evaluation unit which is not regulated before, the main purpose of whom was to increase the combat ability of the students, expected to apply the volunteer army. Park criticized war time policy of Japan in colonial Korea by describing the dark façade of the low-class. Second, since having published <Golmok-an>, Park, however, lost the sense of humor and warm hearted eyes on the life of Korean People under the colonial domination. His narrative voice changed from the polyphony to the monophony. The one is a voice of Park's modernism novels, but rather, the other is a voice of park's popular novel presenting an affectless description of the metropolitan life, such as Seoul. His professional writer’s character was well revealed in his novel <Aegyeong: the love story>, sketching the love affair of the youth in Seoul. By describing verbal life of bilingual user (Korean and Japanese language), he exposed that Korean was colony of Japan for the frist time in his works. Third, Park continually published <Asea-ui Yeomyeong: dawn of the Asia>, describing the detail process of Wangjingwei’s giving up anti-Japanese war, and of establishing Japan's puppet government in Nanjing and cooperating with Japan. In his novel <Asea-ui Yeomyeong>, he introduced Wang's statement, December 27th, 1938, which stressed the necessity of self–autonomy in the boundary of Great-Asia Prosperity. By introducing Wang’s above statement, Park could be said to present his outlook for the future of colonial Korea as well. That is to say, Korea also should be able to obtain self-autonomy as a member of Japanese federal system. Forth, the autobiography trilogy published before and after <Asea-ui Yeomyeong> demonstrated that Park's interest moved into writing for a living, whose change is a result of influence by the compromise to Japan and real life.

Abstract

By reviewing works of Munjang magazine(1939. 2~1941. 4) relatively less studied, this paper traces the change of Park Taewon's literary trends. First Park, in a novel <Golmok-an; inside of the alley>, made sharp criticism for the Act of the entrance system of middle school, announced August 31, 1939. The new Act for collecting students included a physical evaluation unit which is not regulated before, the main purpose of whom was to increase the combat ability of the students, expected to apply the volunteer army. Park criticized war time policy of Japan in colonial Korea by describing the dark façade of the low-class. Second, since having published <Golmok-an>, Park, however, lost the sense of humor and warm hearted eyes on the life of Korean People under the colonial domination. His narrative voice changed from the polyphony to the monophony. The one is a voice of Park's modernism novels, but rather, the other is a voice of park's popular novel presenting an affectless description of the metropolitan life, such as Seoul. His professional writer’s character was well revealed in his novel <Aegyeong: the love story>, sketching the love affair of the youth in Seoul. By describing verbal life of bilingual user (Korean and Japanese language), he exposed that Korean was colony of Japan for the frist time in his works. Third, Park continually published <Asea-ui Yeomyeong: dawn of the Asia>, describing the detail process of Wangjingwei’s giving up anti-Japanese war, and of establishing Japan's puppet government in Nanjing and cooperating with Japan. In his novel <Asea-ui Yeomyeong>, he introduced Wang's statement, December 27th, 1938, which stressed the necessity of self–autonomy in the boundary of Great-Asia Prosperity. By introducing Wang’s above statement, Park could be said to present his outlook for the future of colonial Korea as well. That is to say, Korea also should be able to obtain self-autonomy as a member of Japanese federal system. Forth, the autobiography trilogy published before and after <Asea-ui Yeomyeong> demonstrated that Park's interest moved into writing for a living, whose change is a result of influence by the compromise to Japan and real life.

참고문헌 (13)

  1. "入學에 學科偏重을 緩和 綜合考査制를 採擇", 동아일보, ~ (1939)
  2. "中學入學試驗의 體力基準作成-戰力增强의體育策", 동아일보, ~ (1939)
  3. "京城日報社 편(1944), ?主要都市別戶口(昭和十六年末)?, 『1944年 朝鮮年監』, 57~59면", ~ (1944)
  4. 고인환, "소극적 협력의 한 양상: 일제 말 박태원의 친일문학(탈식민주의를 넘어서)", pp.98~112 (2006), 소명출판사
  5. 김동환, "징병, 의무교육, 총동원 문제로 군부와 총독부 당국에 민간 유지가 문의하는 회", 삼천리, 11(7), pp.30~39 (1939)
  6. 김미영, "박태원의 자화상 연작 연구", 국어국문학, 0(148), pp.123~152 (2008), 국어국문학회
  7. 노천명, "初秋의 半島文學", 삼천리, 12(8), pp.180~188 (1940)
  8. 류보선, "한 문학주의자의 운명: 박태원 수필 읽기(구보가 아즉 박태원일 때)", pp.455~490 (2005), 깊은샘
  9. 박종화, "천변풍경을 읽고", 박문, (6), pp.20~21 (1939)
  10. 손정목, "일제강점기 도시사회상 연구", pp.680~ (1996), 일지사
  11. 정현숙, "박태원 소설에 나타난 신체제 수용양상", pp.271~297 (2007), 박태원과 모더니즘
  12. 조선어학회, "외래어 표기법", 문장, 2(6), pp.308~ (1940)
  13. 한수영, "박태원 소설에서의 근대와 전통‘합리성’에 대한 인식과 ‘신체제론’ 수용의 문제를 중심으로", 한국문학이론과 비평, 9(2), pp.227~256 (2005), 한국문학이론과비평학회

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (11건)