1930-40년대 한국문학계의 중국문학 수용과 번역에 대한 재평가:박태원(朴泰遠)을 중심으로
A re-evalution of the acceptance and translation of Chinese Literature by Korean Literature world in the 1930-1940's:focusing on Tae-won Park
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
초록
The purpose of this study was to probe what made Tae-Won Park, who was famed as a liberal and modernist, enable to create his own literature world by accepting and translating the Chinese literature into Korean language. This study focused two perspectives: the motifs and aesthetic features that appeared in his translation works, and a re-evaluation of his works in light of his creativity and originality. According to three phases that he passed through in the process of acceptance and translation of the Chinese literature, three major issues were reviewed; ① how had his literary paths been changing from the simple curiosity about the Chinese literature? ② what was the dividing line between the creation and translation in his literary works? ③ what made him inevitably lead to become a writer who possessed an adversarial but inclusive style?In the period of 1930 to 1940, a significant change was noticed in Park's literary works; the change was considerably associated with political and social circumstances at the time. Under the Japanese occupation between 1910 and 1945, the Korean writers were not free from militaristic ideology and political propaganda. They had only two choices; abandoning literary activities and accommodating themselves to the political and social tide. At this crossroads, Park became skeptical about producing literary works, but kept exploring new terrain of the literature. By accepting and translating the Chinese literature, Park's efforts to break fresh ground set himself apart from other contemporary writers. Moreover, the translated Chinese novels by Park contributed as a bridge to his own literary creations and provided a solid foundation for his further literary pursuit.
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to probe what made Tae-Won Park, who was famed as a liberal and modernist, enable to create his own literature world by accepting and translating the Chinese literature into Korean language. This study focused two perspectives: the motifs and aesthetic features that appeared in his translation works, and a re-evaluation of his works in light of his creativity and originality. According to three phases that he passed through in the process of acceptance and translation of the Chinese literature, three major issues were reviewed; ① how had his literary paths been changing from the simple curiosity about the Chinese literature? ② what was the dividing line between the creation and translation in his literary works? ③ what made him inevitably lead to become a writer who possessed an adversarial but inclusive style?In the period of 1930 to 1940, a significant change was noticed in Park's literary works; the change was considerably associated with political and social circumstances at the time. Under the Japanese occupation between 1910 and 1945, the Korean writers were not free from militaristic ideology and political propaganda. They had only two choices; abandoning literary activities and accommodating themselves to the political and social tide. At this crossroads, Park became skeptical about producing literary works, but kept exploring new terrain of the literature. By accepting and translating the Chinese literature, Park's efforts to break fresh ground set himself apart from other contemporary writers. Moreover, the translated Chinese novels by Park contributed as a bridge to his own literary creations and provided a solid foundation for his further literary pursuit.
참고문헌 (73)
- 박태원, "오양피", 야담, 4(1) (1938)
- 박태원, "매유랑", 조광, 4(2) (1938)
- 박태원, "두십랑", 야광, 4(3) (1938)
- 박태원, "황감자", 야담, 4(7) (1938)
- 박태원, "부용병", 야담, 4(8) (1938)
- 박태원, "망국조", 사해공론, 4(8) (1938)
- 박태원, "支那小說集" (1939), 인문사
- 박태원, "신역삼국지", 신시대 (1943)
- 박태원, "수호전", 조광 (1944)
- 박태원, "서유기", 신시대 (1945)
- 박태원, "중국소설선1" (1948), 정음사
- 박태원, "수호전" (1948), 정음사
- 박태원, "삼국지" (1950), 정음사
- 박태원, "삼국지 (1-10)" (2008), 깊은샘
- "蔡萬植全集" (1989), 창작과 비평사
- 抱瓮老人, "今古奇觀" (1933), 亞東圖書館
- 抱瓮老人, "今古奇觀" (2005), 上海古籍出版社
- 馮夢龍, "東周列國志" (1934), 大達圖書供應社
- 馮夢龍, "東周列國志" (1990), 岳麓書社
- 馮夢龍, "東周列國志" (2006), 上海古籍出版社
- 羅貫中, "三國志演義" (1995), 中華書局
- 施耐庵, "水滸傳" (1990), 人民文學出版社
- 魯迅, "中國小說史略" (1987), 學硏社
- 齊裕焜, "中國古代小說演變史" (1990), 敦煌文藝出版社
- 袁進, "中國小說的近代變革" (1992), 中國社會科學出版社
- 楊昭全, "中國-朝鮮ㆍ韓國文化交流史 1-4" (2004), 昆崙出版社
- 王德威, "小說中國" (1993), 麥田出版
- 魯迅, "中國小說史略" (1987), 學硏社
- 阿英, "中國近代小說史" (1987), 정음사
- 陳平原, "中國小說敍事學" (1994), 살림
- 조동일, "동아시아문학사비교론" (1993), 서울대학교 출판부
- 홍석표, "중국의 근대적 문학의식 탄생" (2007), 북코리아
- 백영서, "동아시아의 귀환-중국의 근대성을 묻는다" (2000), 창작과 비평사
- 전형준, "동아시아적 시각으로 바라보는 중국문학" (2004), 서울대학교 출판부
- 최원식, "동아시아인의 ‘동양’ 인식-19-20세기" (1997), 문학과 지성사
- 정진배, "중국현대문학과 현대성 이데올로기" (2001), 문학과지성사
- 이종민, "근대 중국의 문학적 사유 읽기" (2004), 소명출판
- 김병철, "韓國近代飜譯文學史硏究" (1975), 을유문화사
- 김윤식, "한국근대문학사연구" (1973), 일지사
- 김현, "한국문학사" (1991), 민음사
- 김봉진, "박태원 소설세계" (2001), 국학자료원
- 김홍식, "박태원 연구" (2000), 국학자료원
- 정현숙, "박태원문학연구" (1993), 국학자료원
- 이상경, "`박태원의 역사소설` in part of 박태원" (1995), 새미
- 강진호, "박태원 소설연구" (1995), 깊은샘
- 구인환, "박태원" (1998), 벽호
- 권영민, "한국현대문학사1" (2002), 민음사
- 이정옥, "1930년대 한국 대중소설의 이해" (2000), 국학자료원
- 천정환, "근대의 책 읽기 : 독자의 탄생과 한국 근대문학" (2003), 푸른역사
- 이시활, "일제강점기 한국 작가들의 중국 현대문학 바라보기와 수용양상 -梁建植, 李東谷, 梁明을 중심으로-", 중국학, (33), pp.433~472 (2009), 대한중국학회
- 박재연, "양백화의 중국문학 번역작품에 대한 재평가-현대 희곡과 소설을 중심으로", 중국학연구 (1988)
- 최용철, "백화 양건식의 중국문학 연구와 수용에 대하여", 중국어문학, 28 (1996)
- 최유학, "박태원 번역소설 연구 : 중국소설의 한국어번역을 중심으로" (2006), 서울대학교 대학원
- 姚委委, "梁白華 飜譯文學 硏究 : 中國 現代文學을 中心으로" (2007), 韓國學中央硏究院
- 장동천, "日據末期韓國期刊登載中國現代文學韓語譯文的背景及特點─以≪三千里≫月刊爲中心", 중국어문논총, 43(43), pp.547~565 (2009), 중국어문연구회
- 성현자, "中國 新文學運動에 관한 연구-梁建植의 중국 신문학운동의 수용을 위한 시론(1)", 개신어문연구, 15 (1998)
- 성현자, "白華 梁建植의 中國新聞學運動 受容 硏究", 비교문학, 24 (1999)
- 엄춘하, "박태원과 무스잉(穆時英)의 소설기법 비교 연구", 석사, 현대문학, pp.2007
- 이명학, "1930년대 한·중 모더니즘 소설 비교연구 : 이상·박태원과 무스잉(穆時英), 스저춘(施蟄存)을 중심으로", 박사, 국어국문학, pp.2005
- 김명학, "박태원과 목시영 소설 비교 연구 : 1930년대 모더니즘 소설을 중심으로", 석사, 비교문학비교문화, pp.2009
- 張뢰, "박태원과 노사의 세태소설 비교연구 : 『천변풍경』과 『사세동당』을 중심으로", 석사, 현대문학, pp.2010
- 권영희, "박태원과 라오서의 도시소설 비교연구 : 『천변풍경』과 『사세동당』을 중심으로", 석사, 국어국문학, pp.2007
- 장동천, "老舍와 박태원 세태소설의 도시 인식 비교 -≪四世同堂≫과 ≪천변풍경≫을 중심으로", 중어중문학, 36, pp.305~332 (2005), 한국중어중문학회
- 김순진, "施蟄存과 朴泰遠의 도시인식", 중국연구, 39 (2007), 중국연구소
- 최용철, "양건식의 홍루몽 평론과 번역문 분석", 중국어문논총, 6 (1993)
- 송강호, "박태원 삼국지의 판본과 번역 연구", 구보학보, 5 (2010)
- 윤진현, "박태원 삼국지 판본 연구", 한국학연구, 14 (2005)
- 김미지, "박태원의 외국문학 독서 체험과 ‘기교’의 탄생", 구보학보, 5 (2010)
- 김미지, "식민지 작가 박태원의 외국문학 체험과 ‘조선어’의 발견―영문학 수용과 번역 작업을 중심으로", 대동문화연구, (70), pp.449~482 (2010), 대동문화연구원
- 장노현, "근대전환기 중국 매개 번역문학의 현황과 양상", 국제어문, (56), pp.321~345 (2012), 국제어문학회
- 이은영, "《新列國志》와 《東周列國志》 비교 연구 - 蔡元放의 수정작업을 중심으로", 중국소설논총, (32), pp.235~257 (2010), 한국중국소설학회
- 김영화, "한국·일본의 명대 백화단편소설 번역·번안 양상 : 삼언·이박과 『금고기관』을 중심으로", 석사, 국어국문학, pp.2011
- 정선태, "모던보이, 중국고전에 빠지다-1930년대 최고의 모더니스트였던 박태원이 중국의 ‘옛소설’을 번역한 이유", 한겨레21, (487) (2003)