본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

완전한 존재를 향한 불가능한 꿈 - 최재서의 ‘국민문학’ 담론의 심리 구조 -

An impossible dream toward the existence of whole thing

0

조회

0

다운로드

5

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류한국어와문학

초록

Choi Jae-seo attempted to change korean literature's direction,because he judged that the korean culture was split. He thought that the cause of this situation was the Western ideas as culturism,individualism, and rationalism, and suggested an alternative as nationalism armed with Japanese spirit. But he still used the culture as the concept of center in his theory. He defined culture as the best value, which needed to disseminate. Certainly, the best value meant nationalism armed with Japanese spirit. On this wise, culture as the best vale was the method of overcoming the spilt between the intellectual and the people, the family and the individual, the consciousness and unconsciousness. Meanwhile, the discourse of Choi Jae-seo's kukminmunhak, in so far as he dined culture as value, was not perception but belief. His theory was ideology as a fantasy and illusion. After the 1943, He overtly emphasized the importance of increased production and martial spirit. This time, he thought the korean didn't understand the nationalism armed with Japanese spirit, he thought that's the biggest problem. He thought korean had the talent to be a excellent worker and soldier, but they did not have the nationalism armed with Japanese spirit. Therefore, he hoped that the korean intellectual enlightened the korean people. But They did not do that. In the end, Choi Jae-seo's theory produced an effect that korean's lack, this means, they didn't understand the nationalism armed with Japanese spirit.

Abstract

Choi Jae-seo attempted to change korean literature's direction,because he judged that the korean culture was split. He thought that the cause of this situation was the Western ideas as culturism,individualism, and rationalism, and suggested an alternative as nationalism armed with Japanese spirit. But he still used the culture as the concept of center in his theory. He defined culture as the best value, which needed to disseminate. Certainly, the best value meant nationalism armed with Japanese spirit. On this wise, culture as the best vale was the method of overcoming the spilt between the intellectual and the people, the family and the individual, the consciousness and unconsciousness. Meanwhile, the discourse of Choi Jae-seo's kukminmunhak, in so far as he dined culture as value, was not perception but belief. His theory was ideology as a fantasy and illusion. After the 1943, He overtly emphasized the importance of increased production and martial spirit. This time, he thought the korean didn't understand the nationalism armed with Japanese spirit, he thought that's the biggest problem. He thought korean had the talent to be a excellent worker and soldier, but they did not have the nationalism armed with Japanese spirit. Therefore, he hoped that the korean intellectual enlightened the korean people. But They did not do that. In the end, Choi Jae-seo's theory produced an effect that korean's lack, this means, they didn't understand the nationalism armed with Japanese spirit.

참고문헌 (19)

  1. "국민문학", ~
  2. 최재서, "전환기의 조선문학" (2006), 영남대학교출판부
  3. 이경훈, "한국 근대 일본어 소설선" (2007), 역락
  4. 고봉준, "지성주의 파탄과 국민문학론", 한국시학연구, (17), pp.5~30 (2006), 한국시학회
  5. 김예림, "‘동아’라는 시뮬라크르 혹은 그 접속자들의 문화 이념-1930년대 후반 최재서·백철의 문화론을 중심으로", 상허학보, 23, pp.201~219 (2008), 상허학회
  6. 김윤식, "최재서의 국민문학과 사토 기요시 교수" (2009), 역락
  7. 김재용, "협력과 저항" (2004), 소명출판
  8. 박노현, "내선인과 국민문학 : 신민족에 의한 신문학 고안의 기획", 한국어문학연구, 42, pp.253~270 (2004)
  9. 신철하, "근대적 이성과 훼손된 지성 -전형기비평의 두 초상", 비평문학, (29), pp.189~213 (2008), 한국비평문학회
  10. 원용진, "대중문화의 패러다임" (2000), 한나래
  11. 윤대석, "식민지 국민문학론" (2006), 역락
  12. 이양숙, "일제 말기 비평의 존재양상 - 최재서의 ‘국민문학론’을 중심으로 -", 비평문학, (28), pp.191~210 (2008), 한국비평문학회
  13. 이원동, "식민지말기 지배담론과 국민문학론", 우리말글, 44, pp.283~305 (2008), 우리말글학회
  14. 이진형, "소설, 서사시, 국민문학 -식민지 시기 최재서의 문학 정치학-", 한국근대문학연구, 1(18), pp.343~370 (2008), 한국근대문학회
  15. 채호석, "과도기의 사유와 ‘국민문학’론- 1940년을 전후한 시기, 최재서의 문학론 연구 -", 외국문학연구, (16), pp.189~207 (2004), 외국문학연구소
  16. 허병식, "교양의 정치학 신체제와 교양주의", 민족문학사연구, (40), pp.70~91 (2009), 민족문학사학회
  17. 아널드, 매슈, "교양과 무질서" (2006), 한길사
  18. 이글턴, 테리, "이데올로기개론" (1995), 한신문화사
  19. 지젝, 슬라보예, "이데올로기라는 숭고한 대상" (2002), 인간사랑

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (10건)