해방 이후의 이찬의 시 세계
The Poetic World of Lee Chan after liberation
1
조회
0
다운로드
3
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This article reviewed the poetic world of Lee Chan after Independence from Japan, which has not been studied enough. In other words, it is to identify where is the root of his poetic world. It is to identify the difference between South and North literature (the orientation of North Korean Literature) as well as to identify the sense of literature and to draw a topographic map of a writer. Additionally, it will make us prepared for the history of literature of reunification by reviewing heterogeneity of North and South Korean literatures. If categorizing the poems of Lee Chan after Independence, they can be classified as poems dealing with the joy of independence, praise of Kim Ilsung, comradeship with Soviet Union, wrath at Japan and US and the ones encouraging labor according to Land Reform. Literature and Art in North Korea is a tool to educate the public as communist citizens, and revolutionize and classify the society. A writer is no more than ‘a technician to reform human will.’ In North Korea, literal activities are deemed same as political activities. For literature is the tool to propaganda the ideology of the system maintenance and move people as they want. Lee Chan is the writer who followed the strategical guidelines of the Party faithfully that proposed the themes and contents of the creation as the task of the era and implemented them in his poems. He lived a life adapting himself to the system. He did not have a sense of literature that a writer should have, so to speak, he did not reflect the objective reality and actuality in his works.
Abstract
This article reviewed the poetic world of Lee Chan after Independence from Japan, which has not been studied enough. In other words, it is to identify where is the root of his poetic world. It is to identify the difference between South and North literature (the orientation of North Korean Literature) as well as to identify the sense of literature and to draw a topographic map of a writer. Additionally, it will make us prepared for the history of literature of reunification by reviewing heterogeneity of North and South Korean literatures. If categorizing the poems of Lee Chan after Independence, they can be classified as poems dealing with the joy of independence, praise of Kim Ilsung, comradeship with Soviet Union, wrath at Japan and US and the ones encouraging labor according to Land Reform. Literature and Art in North Korea is a tool to educate the public as communist citizens, and revolutionize and classify the society. A writer is no more than ‘a technician to reform human will.’ In North Korea, literal activities are deemed same as political activities. For literature is the tool to propaganda the ideology of the system maintenance and move people as they want. Lee Chan is the writer who followed the strategical guidelines of the Party faithfully that proposed the themes and contents of the creation as the task of the era and implemented them in his poems. He lived a life adapting himself to the system. He did not have a sense of literature that a writer should have, so to speak, he did not reflect the objective reality and actuality in his works.
참고문헌 (27)
- 과학원출판사, "조선문학통사(하)" (1959), 과학원출판사
- 김대행, "북한의 시가문학" (1990), 문학과비평사
- 김영철, "1990년대 북한시의 동향 연구", 한국시학연구, 7, pp.3~ (2002), 한국시학회
- 김영철, "북한 현대시의 장르론적 고찰", 국어국문학, 135 (2003), 국어국문학회
- 김영철, "통일문학 방법론 서설", 우리말글, 통권 : 20, pp.375~403 (2000), 우리말글학회
- 김윤식, "북한문학사론" (1996), 새미
- 김응교, "리찬시와 수령형상 문학", 현대문학의연구, 7, pp.227~258 (2001), 현대문학연구학회
- 김응교, "리찬의 개작시 연구", 민족문학사연구, 17, pp.241~267 (2000), 민족문학사학회
- 김응교, "아오바 가오리, 이찬의 희곡「세월」과 친일문학", 민족문화연구, (41), pp.251~278 (2004), 민족문화연구원
- 김응교, "이찬시 연구-잃어버린 화원을 찾아서", 현대문학의연구, 3, pp.181~207 (1991), 한국문학연구학회
- 김응교, "이찬의 일본어 시와 친일시 -이찬 문학 연구 (6)", 현대문학의 연구, (25), pp.301~328 (2005), 한국문학연구학회
- 김응교, "잊혀진 이찬시의 복원-이동순. 박승의 편, 이찬 시전집 (서평)", 실천문학, 통권 : 73, pp.373~384 (2004), 실천문학사
- 김인옥, "해방 전후 이찬 시의 특성 연구", 한국문예비평연구, (32), pp.163~193 (2010), 한국현대문예비평학회
- 김종회, "북한문학의 이해" (2002), 청동거울
- 민족문학사연구소, "북한의 우리문학사" (1991), 창작과 비평사
- 박승희, "이찬의 북한시와 남북한 문학의 단절", 배달말, (30), pp.109~127 (2002), 배달말학회
- 박태상, "두 개의 암초에 맞선 실험적 항해", 한국문예비평연구, (32), pp.7~36 (2010), 한국현대문예비평학회
- 류성민, "분단 반세기 북한 연구사" (1999), 한울
- 손미영, "한민족의 유랑의식 고찰 - 식민지 시대 시문학을 중심으로 -", 한민족문화연구, (22), pp.229~255 (2007), 한민족문화학회
- 신형기, "북한문학사" (2001), 평민사
- 유성호, "이찬 시의 낭만성과 비극성", 비교문화연구, 19, pp.127~148 (2010), 비교문화연구소
- 윤여탁, "한국현대 리얼리즘 시인론" (1990), 태학사
- 이동순, "이찬 시전집" (2003), 소명출판
- 조두섭, "김창술 시의 주체생산 구조", 우리말글, 통권 : 19, pp.225~248 (2000), 우리말글학회
- 조두섭, "이병철 북한 체제 선전시의 유가적 담론구성체에 대한 연구", 한국시학연구, (29), pp.327~357 (2010), 한국시학회
- 최승호, "백석 시의 풍경 연구", 우리말글, 46, pp.267~289 (2009), 우리말글학회
- 한국비평문학회, "혁명전통의 부산물" (1989), 신원문화사
