본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

러시아 아버지 역할의 변화와 헤게모니적 부성 담론의 문제

A Study on the Changing Role of Fathers in Russia and Problem of Hegemonic Discourses on Fatherhood

서승현
한국러시아문학회 (The Korean Association Of Rusists)|2016.02|러시아어문학연구논집 (Russian Language and Literature)|제52호|pp. 335-362|DOI 10.24066/russia.2016..52.014

0

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

hegemonic masculinity부모성parenthood젠더 연구gender studiesfatherhood부성male breadwinner family modelfathering전통적 부성 (모델)헤게모니 부성헤게모니 남성성새로운 아버지 (모델)부재한 아버지 (모델)아버지 되기(파더링)남성생계부양자 가족모델2인 생계부양자 / 2인 양육자 가족모델traditional fatherhood (model)hegemonic fatherhoodnew father (model)absent father (model)dual-earner / dual-carer family model
주제분류러시아어와문학

초록

In Russia the current change of fatherhood model has many roots - the result of soviet family policy, the weakening of male breadwinner families as global economic trends. The article is researched on a new fatherhood as a factor of gender and as a social institute in modern Russian society. For Russian modern men in reality it looks as if there is some difficulty to be fatherly. Until now too many Russian fathers shirk their responsibilities, they often don't pay proper maintenance for their children. But usually men don't have custody of his children in Russian society, even though they are wants. Almost two out of three mothers have custody of her children after divorce. Because in the past child-rearing was the responsibility of the mother in Soviet and it continues today. Besides, during that time child remained in state custody, than with their father. Child support is about emotional as well as financial support. But in Russia it was very often held father were absent in family, not only after divorce. Russian women were able to support themselves and raise their own children without men. But now many Russian men started to believe that child-rearing is an important responsibility. Though, Russian government don't help to men to participate actively in the rearing and well-being of their children, based on the new father model. For many modern Russian fathers are more important career success than rearing their children, based on the traditional fatherhood model. This tendency signifies father's rights are not free from hegemonic masculinity in Russian society.

Abstract

In Russia the current change of fatherhood model has many roots - the result of soviet family policy, the weakening of male breadwinner families as global economic trends. The article is researched on a new fatherhood as a factor of gender and as a social institute in modern Russian society. For Russian modern men in reality it looks as if there is some difficulty to be fatherly. Until now too many Russian fathers shirk their responsibilities, they often don't pay proper maintenance for their children. But usually men don't have custody of his children in Russian society, even though they are wants. Almost two out of three mothers have custody of her children after divorce. Because in the past child-rearing was the responsibility of the mother in Soviet and it continues today. Besides, during that time child remained in state custody, than with their father. Child support is about emotional as well as financial support. But in Russia it was very often held father were absent in family, not only after divorce. Russian women were able to support themselves and raise their own children without men. But now many Russian men started to believe that child-rearing is an important responsibility. Though, Russian government don't help to men to participate actively in the rearing and well-being of their children, based on the new father model. For many modern Russian fathers are more important career success than rearing their children, based on the traditional fatherhood model. This tendency signifies father's rights are not free from hegemonic masculinity in Russian society.

참고문헌 (47)

  1. 남석주, "스딸린 시대의 가족문제:1926~1936년 가족문제와 가족정책을 중심으로", 아세아연구, 46(2), pp.365~394 (2003), 아세아문제연구소
  2. 신경아, "신자유주의시대 남성 생계부양자의식의 균열과 젠더관계의 변화", 한국여성학, 30(4), pp.153~187 (2014), 한국여성학회
  3. 서승현, "현대 러시아 가족정책 연구: 젠더적 측면의 쟁점과 변화를 중심으로", 러시아어문학연구논집, (44), pp.451~484 (2013), 한국러시아문학회
  4. Акулич М.М., "Социологичекое изучение отцовства", Вестник Тюменского государственного университета, (4), pp.106~111 (2009)
  5. Берд Ш., "Наслаждение быть мужчиной: западные теории маскулинностии постсоветские практики", pp.7~37 (2008)
  6. "Введение в гендерные исследования: учебное пособие", pp.94~96 (2000), МГУ
  7. Горбачева В.И., "Методологические основания теоретического изучения отцовства", Вестник Российскогогосударственного гуманитарного ун-та, (3), pp.216~230 (2011)
  8. Гурко Т.А., "Мужчина и женщина:меняющиеся роли и образы", pp.216~222 (1998), Институт этнологии иантропологии РАН
  9. Гурко Т.А., "Вариативность преставлений в сфере родительства", СОЦИС, (11), pp.90~97 (2000)
  10. Гурко Т.А., "Алименты: фактор качественного и количественноговоспроизводства населения", СОЦИС, (9), pp.110~120 (2008)
  11. Гурко Т.А., "Брак и родительство в России", pp.221~248 (2008), Институт социологииРАН
  12. Гурко Т.А., "Семья исемейные отношения: совремнное состояние и тенденцииразвития", pp.43~47 (2008), НИСОЦ
  13. Гурко Т.А., "Социология и общество:глобальные вызовы и региональное развитие: Материалы IV очередного Всероссийского социологического конгресса", pp.3343~3350 (2012), РОС
  14. Гурко Т.А., "Актуальные проблемы родительства в России", pp.52~72 (2013), Институтсоциологии РАН
  15. Замараева З.П., "Особенности трансформацииинститута отцовства в советский период", Теория и практикаобщественного развития, (6), pp.53~56 (2012)
  16. Здравомыслова Е.А., "О муже(И)ственности: сб. статей", pp.432~451 (2002), НЛО
  17. Здравомыслова Е.А., "Российский гендерный порядок: социологич. подход: Коллективная монография", pp.361~ (2007), Европейскийуниверситет
  18. "Дифференциальная психофизиология мужчины иженщины"[URL]
  19. Клёцина И.С., "Отцовство в аналитических подходах к изучениюмаскулинности", Женщина в российском обществе, (3)통권 : 52, pp.29~41 (2009)
  20. Кон И.С., "Гегемонная маскулинность как фактор мужского (не)здоровья", Научно-теоретический журнал. Социология: теория, методы, маркетинг, (4), pp.5~16 (2008)
  21. Кон И.С., "Зачем нужны отцы?", Журнал Звёзда, (12), pp.124~145 (2006)
  22. Кон И.С., "Мужчина в меняющемся мире", pp.496~ (2009), Время
  23. Левенских И.А., "Ролевые позиции отца в современной семье", Вестник Омского ун-та, (1)통권 : 63, pp.349~353 (2012)
  24. Лисовский В.Т., "Молодежь: любовь, брак, семья", pp.279~303 (2003), Наука
  25. Мальцева Д.В., "Теоретические подходы к изучению отцовства всовременной западной социологии", Мониторинг общественногомнения: экономические и социальные перемены, (5)통권 : 99, pp.272~289 (2010)
  26. Михайлова А.И., "Отцовство как новый тип родителей в контекстенаучного знания", Вестник ЗабГУ, (12)통권 : 91, pp.70~79 (2012)
  27. Николаева Я.Г., "Актуальные проблемы семей в России", pp.173~182 (2006), Институт социологии РАН
  28. Новоселов В.М., "Проблемы института отцовства в России", ВестникПермского университета, 3(11), pp.176~178 (2012)
  29. Новоселов В.М., "Проблемы института отцовства в России", Теорияи практика общественного развития, (7), pp.45~47 (2013)
  30. Сазонова Л.А., "Семья иродительство в условиях соверменного развития: тенденции, перспективы и инновации", Теория и практика общественногоразвития, (5), pp.51~54 (2013)
  31. Смыслов Д.А., "Отцовство как общественный исоциально-психологический феномен", Учёные записки РГСУ, (7)통권 : 95, pp.133~139 (2011), РГСУ
  32. Урсова Л. Х., "К вопросу о современном отцовстве имаскулинности", Вестник Кемеровского государственногоун-та, (2)통권 : 62, pp.81~84 (2015)
  33. Харчев А.Г., "Брак и семья в СССР", pp.367~ (1979)
  34. Хитрук Е.Б., "Философские предпосылки формирования феноменаотсутствующий отец в современной культуре", ВестникТомского государственного ун-та, (368), pp.54~59 (2013)
  35. Чернова Ж.В., "Семейная политика в Европе и России: гендерныйанализ", pp.140~189 (2008), норма
  36. Шевченко И.О., "Институт отцовства: состояние, тенденции, проблемы", Вестник Российского государственногогуманитарного ун-та, (3), pp.278~285 (2010)
  37. Шевченко И.О., "Авторитет отца в современной Российской семье", Вестник Российского государственного гуманитарного ун-та, (2), pp.321~343 (2012)
  38. Ушакова В.Г., "Жизнь среди гендерных стереотипов", Еждневнаягазета 『Вечерний Петербург』, 7~8 (2005)
  39. "РИА Новости"[URL]
  40. "Семейный кодекс Украины от 10 января 2002г. №2947-III(в ред. от15 марта 2006г. №3539-IV)", Голос Украины. №38, ~ (2002)
  41. Connell, R.W., "Masculinities", pp.324~ (2005), University of California Press
  42. Fraser, Nancy, "Fortunes of Feminism From: State-Managed Capitalism to Neoliberal Crisis", pp.256~ (2013), Verso
  43. Hobson B., "Men, Masculinities and the Social Politics of Fatherhood", pp.1~25 (2002), Cambridge Press
  44. LaRossa R., "Men's Lives", pp.521~535 (1992), Macmillan
  45. Pleck, J.H., "Changing men: New directions in research on men and masculinity", pp.83~97 (1987), Sage Publications
  46. Wall G., "How involved is involved fathering? An exploration of the contemporary culture of fatherhood", Gender &Society, 21(4), pp.508~527 (2007)
  47. Williams S., "What is Fatherhood? Searching for the Reflexive Father", Sociology, 42(3), pp.487~502 (2008)

관련 논문AI추천

현대 러시아 가족정책 연구: 젠더적 측면의 쟁점과 변화를 중심으로서승현한국러시아문학회 · 러시아어문학연구논집2013 · 제44호러시아 가족형태 다양화와 여성의 역할 문제: 대도시 여성의 일·가족 양립 경험을 중심으로서승현한국러시아문학회 · 러시아어문학연구논집2018 · 제62호현대 러시아 가족의 변화와 전망에 관한 담론 분석서승현한국러시아문학회 · 러시아어문학연구논집2011 · 제36호남성 육아휴직자의 양육 경험과 성별관계의 변화: 남성 육아휴직자의 양육 실천의 경험을 중심으로강혜경한국여성연구원 · 여성학논집2013 · 제30권 제2호사라진 여성해방: 신전통주의 러시아 사회에서 여성의 일과 삶의 변화서승현한국러시아문학회 · 러시아어문학연구논집2017 · 제56권 러시아 가족정책이 출산율에 미치는 영향: 젠더적 관점을 중심으로김성진러시아연구소 · 러시아연구2019 · 제29권 제2호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (13건)

막심 고리키와 혁명: 패러다임의 경계, 혹은 그 너머이강은pp. 9-36이반 부닌과 러시아 혁명:‘러시아의 영혼’에서 ‘영원한 현재’로최진희pp. 37-62미적 경험으로서의 폐허와 고골의 중편소설박미정pp. 63-85레오니트 안드레예프(Л.Н. Андреев)의 창작에 나타난 초인 형상 연구: 『생각(Мысль)』을 중심으로박선진pp. 87-104А. 체홉과 А. 콘찰롭스키의 『바냐 아저씨』연구: 희곡의 영화화 문제를 중심으로백용식pp. 105-136
원문 보기