본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

러시아와 중국의 영화정책 상관성 연구

Research on the Correlation between Russian and Chinese Cinema Policies

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

This paper examines the Correlation between Russian and Chinese cinema policies. The film in China and Russia, which have been in common since the introduction of the film, is used in ideological propaganda by political leaders who have founded out the educational function of the film. So, in both countries, the film has lost all its artistic autonomy and character and has a similarity that has deteriorated as a means of explicit political propaganda education. To gain effective and visible fruit of the political function of the film, Both governments have implemented a series of strong policies, including monopolies on the film industry, regulation and censorship of films. Of course, the current policies of the film industry in Russia and China are more relaxed than in the past, the autonomy and openness of the film industry are guaranteed. to some extent. Nevertheless, the two governments have not yet given up the political expectation for the efficiency of the political functions of the film, in other words, the monopoly and regulation of film are replaced by smooth language of material aid and policy support, the film industry in Russia and China is still subject to government policy regulation through government agencies. As a result of the above policy support, it has been established as an influential mainstream genre by establishing special genre characteristics (history - character blockbuster) in the two countries' movies (industry). This tendency, of course, is a factor that significantly impedes the development of both countries' movies. However, even the influential directors, such as Zhang Yimou , the world famous film director of China, are supporting the mass production of "national film" by distorted directing in the cultural and historical context with huge funding from the government.

Abstract

This paper examines the Correlation between Russian and Chinese cinema policies. The film in China and Russia, which have been in common since the introduction of the film, is used in ideological propaganda by political leaders who have founded out the educational function of the film. So, in both countries, the film has lost all its artistic autonomy and character and has a similarity that has deteriorated as a means of explicit political propaganda education. To gain effective and visible fruit of the political function of the film, Both governments have implemented a series of strong policies, including monopolies on the film industry, regulation and censorship of films. Of course, the current policies of the film industry in Russia and China are more relaxed than in the past, the autonomy and openness of the film industry are guaranteed. to some extent. Nevertheless, the two governments have not yet given up the political expectation for the efficiency of the political functions of the film, in other words, the monopoly and regulation of film are replaced by smooth language of material aid and policy support, the film industry in Russia and China is still subject to government policy regulation through government agencies. As a result of the above policy support, it has been established as an influential mainstream genre by establishing special genre characteristics (history - character blockbuster) in the two countries' movies (industry). This tendency, of course, is a factor that significantly impedes the development of both countries' movies. However, even the influential directors, such as Zhang Yimou , the world famous film director of China, are supporting the mass production of "national film" by distorted directing in the cultural and historical context with huge funding from the government.

참고문헌 (32)

  1. 권기배, "러시아 문화정책의 현황과 과제: 영화정책의 역사와 변화양상을 중심으로", 슬라브학보, 31(4), pp.37~66 (2016), 한국슬라브․유라시아학회
  2. 김수현, "중국의 영화산업 현황과 한·중 공동제작" (2011), 커뮤니케이션북스
  3. 김수현, "중국영화의 이해", pp.171~197 (2007), 도서출판 동녘
  4. 김영준, "포스트 소비에트 시대 러시아 민족주의 블록버스터와 ‘강한 러시아’ 담론", 씨네포럼, (19), pp.195~229 (2014), 영상미디어센터
  5. 니콜라이 그랴칼로프, "유토피아의 환영", pp.15~42 (2010), 도서출판 한울
  6. 박정수, "중국영화산업" (2015), 커뮤니케이션북스
  7. 박희성, "중국영화의 이해", pp.198~235 (2007), 도서출판 동녘
  8. 손상범, "중국의 영화산업 정책과 국제화전략에 관한 연구", 중국과 중국학, 26, pp.37~61 (2015), 중국연구센터
  9. 양경미, "민족주의 영화의 흐름과 전망", 시네마, 1 (2005)
  10. 유로첩, "중국 영화산업의 현황과 전망", 석사, pp.2016
  11. 유수정, "중국 영화산업에서 국가의 역할에 관한 연구 : 2002-2012 영화정책의 변화를 중심으로", 석사, 정치학과, pp.2014
  12. 이강인, "중국영화의 민족주의 현상에 대한 연구 -영화 <영웅>과 <집결호>를 중심으로-", 국제정치연구, 11(1), pp.133~154 (2008), 동아시아국제정치학회
  13. 이문영, "현대 러시아 영화산업의 변화와 블록버스터", 러시아연구, 17(2), pp.269~294 (2007), 러시아연구소
  14. 이장희, "중국영화의 이해", pp.42~73 (2007), 도서출판 동녘
  15. 이지연, "유토피아의 환영", pp.264~299 (2010), 한울
  16. 이태형, "중국영화진흥정책과 블록버스터 영화 성공의 특수성", 인문사회 21, 7(6), pp.431~449 (2016), 사단법인 아시아문화학술원[DOI]
  17. 이희원, "현대 러시아의 ‘거대’ 영화들 – 국가 이념과 유라시아주의 구현 양상을 중심으로", e-Eurasia, 21, pp.3~6 (2010)
  18. 이희원, "영화 <위대한 시민>과 소비에트의 시네마 폴리티카", 동북아 문화연구, 1(37), pp.519~541 (2013), 동북아시아문화학회
  19. 인홍, "글로벌 배경하에서 중국 영화산업 발전 추세", 아시아리뷰, 3(1), pp.31~52 (2013)
  20. 정현두, "소비에트 러시아의 문화정책과 영화 : 1920년대를 중심으로", 박사, 국제관계학, pp.2002
  21. А. Г. Латышев, "Суровая драма народа; ученые и публицисты о природе сталинизма" (1989), Молитиздат
  22. Dobrenko, Evgeny, "Stalinist Cinema and the Production of History: Museum of the Revolution" (2008), Edinburgh University Press
  23. Spring, Derek, "Stalinism and Soviet Cinema" (1993), Routledge
  24. Stite. R., "Russian Popular Culture: Entertainment and Society since 1900" (1992), Cambridge Univ. Press
  25. 李長春, "電影藝術", pp.307~ (2006), 中國電影家協會
  26. "Википедия"[URL]
  27. 라승도, "2014 러시아 사회문화, 애국주의와 내적 동원의 논리", Russia-CISFocus. 307, ~ (2015)
  28. "진시황, 중국의 역사"[URL]
  29. "키로프"[URL]

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (5건)