본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

분단 상처와 치유의 상상력- 하근찬 소설을 중심으로 -

Wounds of the Division and Imagination of Healing -With Focus on Ha Geun-chan’s Novels-

0

조회

0

다운로드

14

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류한국어와문학

초록

The purpose of this thesis is to examine ‘the wounds and healing’ arising from the place where personal experiences and historical experiences are overlapped. The literary world of Ha Geun-chan, the author of ‘Soonanidae’ (Ordeals of two generations), was dealt with as the specific object of study With regard to Korean War and the division of the country, Korean literature in the 1950s~1960s was tied up in anti- Communism. Anti-communism was a kind of ruling techniques that reinforces the ruling system through ideological oppression. Under the ideological oppression, Ha Geun-chan created literature relatively freed from the oppression of anti-Communism. How could the writer, who had personal wounds of his father being charged of reactionary and killed by the North Korean People’s Army, form the distance from the ideological regulating power? This is meaningful as a case of wounds from the division being healed by literature. Ha Geun-chan’s major works include Soonanidae (1957), Ferry Stories (1959), White Paper Beard (1959), Hongso (1960), Boon (1961), Royal Tomb and Occupation Forces (1963), the Mountain Rumbling (1964). These novels painfully described the wounds that the war had left. It was sudden misery stormed into the peaceful village, and in a sense, it could be a narration of remorse and wishing that it might have been better if it had been out of touch with the external world. The resistant actions against this are represented by cutting off the river way by ferry (Ferry Stories), crushing bullets with stones (Backwoods Fable), describing war wounds from the war stormed into the mountain village (Mountain Rumbling), destroying the notice of the person killed in battle (Hongso), and describing positive refusal of conscription. (Boon)Ha Geun-chan’s novels dealing with the division of the country and war wounds may be viewed as foolish defense against war. However, such foolishness is a kind of literary methods to soothe war wounds that have already occurred and undoubtedly exist. If the readers in the 1950s and the1960s sympathized with Ha Geun-chan’s novels, it would be because the novels comforted those who were still suffering from war wounds with soothing words. Most of all, his populist attitude of viewing the world from the position of damaged people played an important role in forming the views of regarding the war as the violence of powers and the violence of the nations. If Ha Geun-chan’s literature performed healing functions, it is deeply related to populism. He took the attitude of seeing the war from beneath from the viewpoint of the people. Before discussing the justification of war, he showed how violent the war was and embodied in literature why the war must not break out again in this country. It is well revealed in his language that he tried to maintain people’s viewpoints. Ha Geun-chan’s novels all used Gyeongsang-do crude dialect full of warmth This is where Ha Geun-chan’s literary attitude of adhering to people’s sentiments through the people’s language is confirmed. It can be said to be a ‘carnivalesque imagination’ that heals the wounds of the division with the people’s language through the populist viewpoints.

Abstract

The purpose of this thesis is to examine ‘the wounds and healing’ arising from the place where personal experiences and historical experiences are overlapped. The literary world of Ha Geun-chan, the author of ‘Soonanidae’ (Ordeals of two generations), was dealt with as the specific object of study With regard to Korean War and the division of the country, Korean literature in the 1950s~1960s was tied up in anti- Communism. Anti-communism was a kind of ruling techniques that reinforces the ruling system through ideological oppression. Under the ideological oppression, Ha Geun-chan created literature relatively freed from the oppression of anti-Communism. How could the writer, who had personal wounds of his father being charged of reactionary and killed by the North Korean People’s Army, form the distance from the ideological regulating power? This is meaningful as a case of wounds from the division being healed by literature. Ha Geun-chan’s major works include Soonanidae (1957), Ferry Stories (1959), White Paper Beard (1959), Hongso (1960), Boon (1961), Royal Tomb and Occupation Forces (1963), the Mountain Rumbling (1964). These novels painfully described the wounds that the war had left. It was sudden misery stormed into the peaceful village, and in a sense, it could be a narration of remorse and wishing that it might have been better if it had been out of touch with the external world. The resistant actions against this are represented by cutting off the river way by ferry (Ferry Stories), crushing bullets with stones (Backwoods Fable), describing war wounds from the war stormed into the mountain village (Mountain Rumbling), destroying the notice of the person killed in battle (Hongso), and describing positive refusal of conscription. (Boon)Ha Geun-chan’s novels dealing with the division of the country and war wounds may be viewed as foolish defense against war. However, such foolishness is a kind of literary methods to soothe war wounds that have already occurred and undoubtedly exist. If the readers in the 1950s and the1960s sympathized with Ha Geun-chan’s novels, it would be because the novels comforted those who were still suffering from war wounds with soothing words. Most of all, his populist attitude of viewing the world from the position of damaged people played an important role in forming the views of regarding the war as the violence of powers and the violence of the nations. If Ha Geun-chan’s literature performed healing functions, it is deeply related to populism. He took the attitude of seeing the war from beneath from the viewpoint of the people. Before discussing the justification of war, he showed how violent the war was and embodied in literature why the war must not break out again in this country. It is well revealed in his language that he tried to maintain people’s viewpoints. Ha Geun-chan’s novels all used Gyeongsang-do crude dialect full of warmth This is where Ha Geun-chan’s literary attitude of adhering to people’s sentiments through the people’s language is confirmed. It can be said to be a ‘carnivalesque imagination’ that heals the wounds of the division with the people’s language through the populist viewpoints.

참고문헌 (21)

  1. 하근찬, "산중고발, 사상계 63호" (1958), 사상계사
  2. 하근찬, "위령제, 사상계 86호" (1960), 사상계사
  3. 하근찬, "내 안에 내가 있다" (1997), 엔터
  4. 하근찬, "산울림" (1988), 겨레
  5. 하근찬, "수난이대" (1972), 정음사
  6. 하근찬, "한국현대문학전집13" (1967), 신구문화사
  7. 차승기, "바흐친의 산문학" (2006), 책세상
  8. 김동혁, "‘문학적 공간’의 분석을 통한 ‘지리적 공간’의 재구성 -하근찬의 「수난이대」를 중심으로", 어문론집, (46), pp.239~266 (2011), 중앙어문학회
  9. 다카기 진자부로, "지금 자연을 어떻게 볼 것인가" (2006), 녹색평론사
  10. 미하일 바흐찐, "프랑수아 라블레의 작품과 중세 및 르네상의 민중문화" (2001), 아카넷
  11. 미하일 바흐찐, "장편소설과 민중언어" (1988), 창작과비평사
  12. 이기훈, "일제하 식민지 사범교육", 역사문제연구, (9), pp.41~76 (2002), 역사문제연구소
  13. 이정숙, "전쟁을 기억하는 두 가지 방식 -하근찬의 전쟁서사 연구-", 현대소설연구, (42), pp.397~436 (2009), 한국현대소설학회
  14. 장현, "하근찬 소설의 모티프 연구", 한국현대문학연구, (26), pp.457~489 (2008), 한국현대문학회
  15. 정문권, "한국 戰後小說의 휴머니즘 연구", 박사, pp.1995
  16. 조봉암, "평화통일에의 길 in 진보당" (1985), 지양사
  17. 최현주, "하근찬의 ‘受難二代’에 드러난 距離의 양상", 한국문학이론과 비평, 1, pp.371~390 (1997), 한국문학이론과 비평학회
  18. 카를로 진즈부르그, "「서문」, 치즈와 구더기", pp.53~60 (2001), 문학과지성사
  19. 하정일, "한국전쟁의 시공간성과 1960년대 소설의 새로움-하근찬을 중심으로", 한국언어문학, 40, pp.637~659 (1998), 한국언어문학회
  20. 허명숙, "민족 수난사의 환유와 신화적 사고의 표상 - 하근찬 소설을 중심으로", 한국문예비평연구, (26), pp.81~108 (2008), 한국현대문예비평학회
  21. 홍인숙, "獨逸 歸鄕文學(Heimkehrerliteratur)硏究 : Wolfgang Borchert와 河瑾燦의<受難 二代>를 비교하여", 박사, pp.1986

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (15건)