『악령』의 러시아 메시아니즘에 대한 현대 러시아 종교 문예학계의 비평 경향 고찰 : 베르쟈예프의 고찰에 대한 논쟁을 중심으로
Reflections on Contemporary Russian Religious Literary Studies on Russian Messianism in Dostoevsky's The Possessed : Focusing on Debates on Berdyaev's Reflections
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This paper aims to reflect on contemporary Russian religious literary studies on Dostoevsky’s eschatological worldview, focusing on Russian messianism in his eschatological novel, The Possessed from the author’s evangelical viewpoint, while referring to their debates on N. Berdyaev’s reflections on Dostoevsky. According to Zyryanov, the contemporary Russian religious literary studies are divided into theological-dogmatic circle and philological circle integrated into the ethno-confessional field of historic poetics. The first circle acknowledges Dostoevsky as a Russian Orthodox writer in accordance with Russian Orthodox dogmas, simultaneously criticizing Berdyaev for his acclaim of Dostoevsky as ‘the most Christian writer’ for prophesying the imminent advent of the third eschatological era and for his criticism of Dostoevsky’s negative Russian messianism. The other circle could be divided into two sub-categories: one acknowledging Dostoevsky as a Russian Orthodox writer in accordance with ethnic Russian Orthodox culture, criticizing Berdyaev’s reflections; and the other one highly estimating Berdyaevs’s reflections. From my evangelical viewpoint, contemporary Russian religious studies should inherit creatively the heritage of Berdyaev’s and other religious philosophers’ sanctuary-free studies, reflecting on the Orthodox dogmas and Russian messianism in the theological dimension.
Abstract
This paper aims to reflect on contemporary Russian religious literary studies on Dostoevsky’s eschatological worldview, focusing on Russian messianism in his eschatological novel, The Possessed from the author’s evangelical viewpoint, while referring to their debates on N. Berdyaev’s reflections on Dostoevsky. According to Zyryanov, the contemporary Russian religious literary studies are divided into theological-dogmatic circle and philological circle integrated into the ethno-confessional field of historic poetics. The first circle acknowledges Dostoevsky as a Russian Orthodox writer in accordance with Russian Orthodox dogmas, simultaneously criticizing Berdyaev for his acclaim of Dostoevsky as ‘the most Christian writer’ for prophesying the imminent advent of the third eschatological era and for his criticism of Dostoevsky’s negative Russian messianism. The other circle could be divided into two sub-categories: one acknowledging Dostoevsky as a Russian Orthodox writer in accordance with ethnic Russian Orthodox culture, criticizing Berdyaev’s reflections; and the other one highly estimating Berdyaevs’s reflections. From my evangelical viewpoint, contemporary Russian religious studies should inherit creatively the heritage of Berdyaev’s and other religious philosophers’ sanctuary-free studies, reflecting on the Orthodox dogmas and Russian messianism in the theological dimension.
참고문헌 (36)
- 노리스, 크리스토퍼, "종말론:최후의 날에 관한 12편의 에세이" (2011), 문학과지성사
- 도스토예프스키, 표도르, "악령 상, 하" (2009), 열린책들
- 듀발, J. 스캇, "요한계시록의 심장: 요한계시록의 열 가지 핵심 주제 이해하기" (2020), 새물결플러스
- 모출스키, 콘스탄틴, "도스토예프스키 2" (2000), 책세상
- 베르자예프, 니콜라이, "도스토예프스키의 세계관" (2011), 행복한박물관
- 이경완, "현대 러시아 정교 비평가들의 고골의 「무서운 복수」 연구에 대한 성서적 고찰 - 고골의 종말론 연구를 중심으로 -", 슬라브硏究, 37(1), pp.149~181 (2021), 러시아연구소[DOI]
- 이경완, "현대 서구와 러시아의 신학적 회귀에 대한 성서적 고찰 - 러시아 종교 문예학을 중심으로 -", 슬라브硏究, 36(1), pp.307~334 (2020), 러시아연구소[DOI]
- 플로롭스키, 게오르기, "러시아 신학의 여정II" (2016), 지식을만드는지식
- 아감벤, "바울의 정치적 종말론: 바디우", pp.핀켈데, 도미니크, 지젝
- 토스카노, 알베르토, "광신: 어느 저주받은 개념의 계보학" (2013), 후마니타스
- 홍성혁, "요엘 4장의 묵시적 종말론 모티프와 그 기능: 야훼의 시온 통치를 통한 새 세상 도래 부각", 구약논단, 20(2), pp.186~216 (2014), 한국구약학회[DOI]
- Бердяев Н.А., "Откровение о человеке в творчестве Достоевского" (2018), T8rugram
- Бердяев Н.А., "Русская идея" (2008), Азбука-классика
- "Ставрогин"[URL]
- "Христианство и антисемитизм"[URL]
- "Кошмар злого добра. О книге И. Ильина «О сопротивлении злу силою»(1926)"[URL]
- "Бахтин и Бердяев о Достоевском" (2020)[URL]
- Бульгаков С., "Русская трагедия" (1996), Респубика
- Достоевский Ф.М, "Полн．собр соч. в 30 т" (1973), Наука
- "Категория соборности в русской литературе" (1995)[URL]
- "Достоевский и Евангелие: А выйду из каторги —писать начну.…" (2011)[URL]
- "О проблемно-методологическом поле религиозной филологии"[URL]
- "Кошмар Н.А. Бердяева, Необходимая оборона(1926)"[URL]
- Кавацца А., "Проблемыисторической поэтики: Анализ, интерпретации, понимание Вып. 14" (2016), Издательство ПетрГУ
- Купина Н.А., "Теория политической лингвистики Русскаяидея в контексте современности: "Бесы" достоевского иаксиологические суждения Бердяева", Политическая лингвистика., 52(2), pp.31~38 (2015)
- Магарил-Ильяева Т, "Богословие Достоевского в пониманииБердяева", Достоевский и мировая культура, 3, pp.117~139 (2020)
- Мень А., "Мировая духовная культура. Христианство. Церковь. Лекции и беседы" (1995), Фонд имени Александра Меня
- "Вечер памяти Н.А. Бердяева" (1989)[URL]
- Перевозчикова Л.С., "Новое религиозное сознание»как идейное течение русской культуры", Научные ведомости, 9, pp.100~104 (2014)
- Сыромятников О.И., "Вестник Вятского государственного гуманитарногоуниверситета", pp.112~121 (2014)
- Щенников Г.К., "Целостность Достоевского" (2001), Издательство Уральского университета
- Эпштейн М.Н., "Вера и образ. Религиозное бессознательноев русской культуре 20-го века" (1994), Hermitage
- Daniel E.R., "Apocalypse in the Middle Ages" (1993), Cornell Univ. Press
- Kantor V., "Berdyaev on Dostoevsky: Theodicy and Freedom, Russian Studies in Philosophy", Russian Studies in Philosophy, 53(4), pp.324~337 (2015)
- McGinn B., "Apocalypse in the Middle Ages" (1993), McGinn B. Cornell Univ. Press
- Žižek S., "God in Pain: Inversions of Apocalypse" (2012), Seven Stories Press