“만들어지고 있는” 민족/국가(nation): 포스트소비에트 벨라루스의 민족주의와 국가정체성
“Becoming" nation: Nationalism in Post-soviet Belarus and state-building
0
조회
0
다운로드
3
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This article discusses the Belarusian case of post-communist development and the role of not only ethnic, but also ‘transnational’ nationalism in Belarus’ state building process. But many european discourses conceptualizes Belarus as a “nonexistent” or “undeveloped” nation. This article argues against these traditional scholarly paradigm of nationalism and configures the characteristics of Belarusian nationalism.Much current discussion of Belarus focuses on the contest between the “Soviet” understanding of the nation propagated by the authoritarian government and the “European” discourse of the democratic opposition. But the victory of Lukashenko in the 2010 presidential election poses a pertinent questions: how to define a socially relevant concept of national identity that can unify Belarusians. In this article will be investigated three types of Belatusian nationalisms - Nativist, Russophile, and Creole strands of nationalism. In this process we can understand the discursive strategy of Lukashenka’s policies and how he can be elected 4 times. After two decades of independence, and with a functioning stable state, Belarusians have come to the point where they need a shared, universally accepted, veritable and satisfying understanding of themselves as a nation, and a common vision of their goals and priorities of development. This article surveys the history of nationalist movements or projects for last two decades in the independent Belarus, especially Lukashenko’s state nationalism, which served as an efficient national ideology for most of Belarusian people and diagnoses the future development of his nationalistic strategy.
Abstract
This article discusses the Belarusian case of post-communist development and the role of not only ethnic, but also ‘transnational’ nationalism in Belarus’ state building process. But many european discourses conceptualizes Belarus as a “nonexistent” or “undeveloped” nation. This article argues against these traditional scholarly paradigm of nationalism and configures the characteristics of Belarusian nationalism.Much current discussion of Belarus focuses on the contest between the “Soviet” understanding of the nation propagated by the authoritarian government and the “European” discourse of the democratic opposition. But the victory of Lukashenko in the 2010 presidential election poses a pertinent questions: how to define a socially relevant concept of national identity that can unify Belarusians. In this article will be investigated three types of Belatusian nationalisms - Nativist, Russophile, and Creole strands of nationalism. In this process we can understand the discursive strategy of Lukashenka’s policies and how he can be elected 4 times. After two decades of independence, and with a functioning stable state, Belarusians have come to the point where they need a shared, universally accepted, veritable and satisfying understanding of themselves as a nation, and a common vision of their goals and priorities of development. This article surveys the history of nationalist movements or projects for last two decades in the independent Belarus, especially Lukashenko’s state nationalism, which served as an efficient national ideology for most of Belarusian people and diagnoses the future development of his nationalistic strategy.
참고문헌 (22)
- 베네딕트 앤더슨, "상상의 공동체" (2004), 나남
- 어네스트 겔너, "민족과 민족주의" (2009), 한반도국제대학원대학교
- 에릭 홉스봄, "만들어진 전통" (2004), 휴머니스트
- Мечковская, Н., "Почему в постсоветской Беларуси все меньше говорятна белорусском языке?", Неприкосновенный запас, 6(80) (2011)
- Шевцов, Ю., "Объединенные нации: Феномен Белоруси" (2005)
- Bekus N., "Nationalism and socialism: “Phase D” in the Belarusian nation-building", Nationalities Papers, 38(6), pp.829~846 (2010)
- Bekus N., "Ethnic identity in post-Soviet Belarus: ethnolinguistic survival as an argument in the political struggle", Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 35(1), pp.43~58 (2014)
- Buhr R.L., "Belarus: an emerging civic nation?", Nationalities Papers, 39(3), pp.425~440 (2011)
- Goujon A., "“Genozid”: A rallying cry in Belarus. A rhetoric analysis of some Belarusian nationalist texts", Journal of genocide research, 1(3), pp.353~366 (1999)
- Goujon A., "Language, Nationalism, and Populism in Belarus", Nationalities Papers, 27(4), pp.661~677 (1999)
- Grüner F., "‘Russia's battle against the foreign’: the anti-cosmopolitanism paradigm in Russian and Soviet ideology", European Review of History—Revue européenne d’histoire, 17(3), pp.445~472 (2010)
- Ioffe G., "Culture Wars, Soul-Searching, and Belarusian Identity", East European Politics and Societies, 21(2), pp.348~381 (2007)
- Ioffe G., "Unfinished Nation-Building in Belarus and the 2006Presidential Election", Eurasian Geography and Economics, 48(1), pp.37~58 (2007)
- Kuzio T., "National Identities and Virtual Foreign Policies among the Eastern Slavs", Nationalities Papers, 31(4), pp.431~452 (2007)
- Laruelle M., "Alexei Navalny and challenges in reconciling “nationalism” and “liberalism”", Post-Soviet Affairs, 30(4), pp.276~297 (2014)
- Pershai A., "Questioning the Hegemony of the Nation State in Belarus:Production of Intellectual Discourses as Production of Resources", Nationalities Papers, 34(5), pp.623~635 (2006)
- Pershai A., "Localness and Mobility in Belarusian Nationalism: The Tactic of Tuteishas'c'", Nationalities Papers, 36(1), pp.85~103 (2008)
- Pershai A., "Minor Nation: The Alternative Modes of Belarusian Nationalism", East European Politics and Societies, 24(3), pp.379~398 (2010)
- "The national language debate in Belarus" (2005)[URL]
- Sahm A., "Political culture and national symbols: Their impact on the Belarussian Nation-building process", Nationalities Papers, 27(4), pp.649~660 (1999)
- Titarenko L., "Post-soviet national identity: Belarusian approaches and Paradoxes", Philosofija, Sociologija, 18(4), pp.79~90 (2007)
- Wilson A., "Belarus: the last European dictatorship" (2011), Yale University Press