본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Belarus’ Foreign Policy: Evolution, Driving Forces, Choices

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류학제간연구

초록

The objective of this study is to analyze the foreign policy that Belarus, located in the geopolitically gray area between East and West, pursues for its national survival and prosperity, in terms of evolution, driving forces and choices. Since its declaration of sovereignty in 1991, Belarus’ foreign policy has gone through the dialectic evolution process of the following four stages: the so‐called “period of pro‐western neutral line” (Aug. 1991‐Jul. 1994) by the Stanislav Shushkevich regime in the early years of independence; “the pro‐Russian period” corresponding to the first period under the rule of Alexander Lukashenko (Jul.1994‐Sep.2001); “the period of independence from Russia” corresponding to the second period under the rule of Lukashenko; “the period of East‐West equilibrium policy in the third period under the rule of Lukashenko. The establishment and change of Belarus’ foreign policy have been affected by the following four key factors: 1) Russia’s taming of Belarus; 2) the West’s coaxing and pressure for taking Belarus out of the influential area of Russia; 3) Lukashenko’s 18‐year iron‐fist dictatorship; 4) difference in national identity between the eastern and western parts of Belarus. They act as the complex driving forces for deciding foreign policy by mutual actions rather than separate functions for deciding foreign policy. It is above all diplomatic flexibility that the current Lukashenko government needs to expand in order to overcome the offensives of foreign powers on the one hand and to continue social integration and economic development on the other, while consolidating its power and national sovereignty. More specifically, it is necessary to make every effort for not only “the external balancing” of offsetting foreign pressures by coping with the policies of the foreign powers that have relations of deep interests with Belarus but approach Belarus with different purposes, but also “the expansion and strengthening of the diplomatic cooperation relations with the countries friendly toward Belarus. To sum up, the current conditions require “multi‐vector, multi‐faceted foreign policy.”

Abstract

The objective of this study is to analyze the foreign policy that Belarus, located in the geopolitically gray area between East and West, pursues for its national survival and prosperity, in terms of evolution, driving forces and choices. Since its declaration of sovereignty in 1991, Belarus’ foreign policy has gone through the dialectic evolution process of the following four stages: the so‐called “period of pro‐western neutral line” (Aug. 1991‐Jul. 1994) by the Stanislav Shushkevich regime in the early years of independence; “the pro‐Russian period” corresponding to the first period under the rule of Alexander Lukashenko (Jul.1994‐Sep.2001); “the period of independence from Russia” corresponding to the second period under the rule of Lukashenko; “the period of East‐West equilibrium policy in the third period under the rule of Lukashenko. The establishment and change of Belarus’ foreign policy have been affected by the following four key factors: 1) Russia’s taming of Belarus; 2) the West’s coaxing and pressure for taking Belarus out of the influential area of Russia; 3) Lukashenko’s 18‐year iron‐fist dictatorship; 4) difference in national identity between the eastern and western parts of Belarus. They act as the complex driving forces for deciding foreign policy by mutual actions rather than separate functions for deciding foreign policy. It is above all diplomatic flexibility that the current Lukashenko government needs to expand in order to overcome the offensives of foreign powers on the one hand and to continue social integration and economic development on the other, while consolidating its power and national sovereignty. More specifically, it is necessary to make every effort for not only “the external balancing” of offsetting foreign pressures by coping with the policies of the foreign powers that have relations of deep interests with Belarus but approach Belarus with different purposes, but also “the expansion and strengthening of the diplomatic cooperation relations with the countries friendly toward Belarus. To sum up, the current conditions require “multi‐vector, multi‐faceted foreign policy.”

참고문헌 (28)

  1. Abdelal, Rawi, "Memories of nations and states: institutional history and national in post‐soviet Eurasia", Nationalities Papers, 30(3), pp.459~484 (2002)
  2. Brzezinski, Z., "The Grand Chess Board" (2000), Samin
  3. Doran, Peter B., "Belarus and the West: Three Scenarios", CEPA, 117, pp.1~7 (2011)
  4. Duncan, Peter J.S., "Westernism, Eurasianism and Pragmatism: The Foreign Policy of Post‐Soviet States, 1991‐2001" (2002), Palgrave Macmillan
  5. Hong Suk‐woo, "Grey Zones in Eastern Europe: Ukraine, Moldova and Belarus in the Post‐Soviet Age", Sino‐Soviet Affairs, 34(4), pp.189~218 (2011)
  6. Hong Wan‐suk, "Russian‐Ukraine Relations in De‐Soviet Space and Politico‐Economic Security Order in Eurasia", International Area Review, 11(1), pp.375~402 (2007)
  7. The Belarusian Economy and Its Economic Relations with the EU, "Hwang Jeeyoung", SNU‐KIEP EU Center, ~ (2010)
  8. Joh Won‐ho, "Russia and Belarus, What is the Truth of 4‐Day Natural Gas Conflicts?", Russia·CIS Focus, (71) (2010)
  9. Kim Byung‐ho, "Excuse for Putin", Maeil Economic Daily, ~ (2007)
  10. Konoƒ'czuk, Wojciech, "Difficult 'Ally' ‐ Belarus in Russia's Foreign Policy" (2008), Center for Eastern Studies
  11. Korosteleva, Elena, "The Limits of the EU Governance: Belarus' Response to the European Neighbourhood Policy", Contemporary Politics, 15(2), pp.229~245 (2009)
  12. Leshchenko, Natalia, "A fine instrument: two nation building strategies in post‐Soviet Belarus", Nations and Nationalism, 10(3), pp.333~352 (2004)
  13. Mitchel, Lincoln A., "The Belarus Dilemma", Foreign Policy, ~ (2010)
  14. Park Jung‐ho, "Belarus’ National Building and Identity Factors, In National Identities in Eurasia" (2010), Hanul Academy
  15. Robert Legvold, "Sword and Sustenance: The Economic Security in Belarus and Ukraine" (2004), The MIT Press
  16. "Belarus Announces New Foreign Policy", Kommersant, (Apr. 25, 2007), ~ (2007)
  17. "Belarus pursues multiple‐vector peaceful foreign policy", BelTA, (Apr. 4, 2011), ~ (2011)
  18. "Belarus’s Lukashenko to the West: What Did You Expect?", FPI Bulletin, (Dec. 29, 2010), ~ (2010)
  19. "EU un US Impose Sanctions against Belarusian Leadership", Yonhap News, (Feb. 1, 2011), ~ (2011)
  20. "IMF Gives Additional Financial Support to Belarus", Yonhap News, (Oct. 22, 2009), ~ (2009)
  21. "Outposts of Tyranny: Belarus", The Washington Post, (Apr. 12, 2005), ~ (2005)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (12건)