화행과 러시아어의 상: 실험언어학적 연구
Speech Acts and Russian Aspect: An Experimental Study
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This paper examines how Russian aspect functions in the area of speech act. The main purpose of the paper is twofold. First, it investigates how Russian native speakers use an aspectual distinction in the perspective of direct vs. indirect speech act. Second, it shows how Korean-speaking learners of Russian develop their pragmatic competence in verbal aspect. Following Hong (1998, 1999), who claim that Russian aspect can play a role as an illocutionary force indicating device (IFID) under certain conditions, the paper puts forward two hypotheses. Forty-three learners and twenty-four Russian native speakers participate in the study, an elicited production task and an acceptability judgement task. The results of the study show that Russian native speakers occasionally prefer imperfective in an indirect speech act and perfective in a direct speech act. Moreover, advanced learners approximate to natives in the domain of acceptability judgement rather than production. They do not always outperform intermediate learners in production.
Abstract
This paper examines how Russian aspect functions in the area of speech act. The main purpose of the paper is twofold. First, it investigates how Russian native speakers use an aspectual distinction in the perspective of direct vs. indirect speech act. Second, it shows how Korean-speaking learners of Russian develop their pragmatic competence in verbal aspect. Following Hong (1998, 1999), who claim that Russian aspect can play a role as an illocutionary force indicating device (IFID) under certain conditions, the paper puts forward two hypotheses. Forty-three learners and twenty-four Russian native speakers participate in the study, an elicited production task and an acceptability judgement task. The results of the study show that Russian native speakers occasionally prefer imperfective in an indirect speech act and perfective in a direct speech act. Moreover, advanced learners approximate to natives in the domain of acceptability judgement rather than production. They do not always outperform intermediate learners in production.
참고문헌 (10)
- 박현아, "한국어 화자의 러시아어 일반사실적 불완료상 습득", 박사, 언어학과, pp.2012
- 양용준, "간접화행과 대화 함축의 비교․분석", 영어영문학, 9, pp.63~83 (2002)
- 이남경, "러시아어 의문문의 대화 기능 연구: 질문을 가장한 간접화행", 슬라브어 연구, 11, pp.255~274 (2006), 한국슬라브어학회
- 홍택규, "러시아어 동사 상과 언표내적 행위", 러시아연구, 8(1), pp.137~173 (1998)
- 홍택규, "IFID적 기제로서의 현대 러시아어 상: 간접화행의 문제를 중심으로", 러시아어문학 연구논집, 6(1), pp.235~261 (1999)
- 홍택규, "러시아어 동사 상과 담화응집성: 외적 상을 중심으로", 슬라브학보, 20(2), pp.21~50 (2005), 한국슬라브․유라시아학회
- Лагутин В. И, "Прагматический аспект исследования вопросительныхпредложений" (1990), Кишинев
- Падучева Е. В, "Семантические исследования" (1996), Школа, ЯРК)
- Соколовская К. А., "Прагматическая интерпретация аспектуальнойхарактеристики высказываний", Вопросы языкознания, 5, pp.59~69 (1993)
- Tyurikova, Y, "Expression of Politeness", Impoliteness via the Aspectual Forms in the Imperative in Russian, The Ohio State University, 2008