거란소자 해독을 위한 기초적 연구
A basic study for decipherment of Kitan Small Script
1
조회
0
다운로드
3
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The Kitan script, which represents the Kitan language, was created in the 10th century. There are two kinds of script: Large Script and Small Script. These scripts were nearly forgotten for several centuries after the decay of Kitan Dynasty. It was rediscovered through fortuitous excavation of the Kitan emperors’ tombs in 1922. Recent research has been carried out actively, with many new discoveries being revealed. In this paper, the data of the Kitan Script were fully collated. Generally in this field, identical materials are named differently by different researchers. In order to reduce confusion, identical materials with different names are listed under the representative title. To introduce the method of decipherment of the Kitan Small Script, the decipherment of Langjun Xingji (1134) was given as an example. As it has a Chinese translation in parallel, it has been regarded as the first key to the decipherment of the Kitan Small Script. Based on such studies, we will have a chance to understand the Kitan language lying beyond the Kitan Scripts.
Abstract
The Kitan script, which represents the Kitan language, was created in the 10th century. There are two kinds of script: Large Script and Small Script. These scripts were nearly forgotten for several centuries after the decay of Kitan Dynasty. It was rediscovered through fortuitous excavation of the Kitan emperors’ tombs in 1922. Recent research has been carried out actively, with many new discoveries being revealed. In this paper, the data of the Kitan Script were fully collated. Generally in this field, identical materials are named differently by different researchers. In order to reduce confusion, identical materials with different names are listed under the representative title. To introduce the method of decipherment of the Kitan Small Script, the decipherment of Langjun Xingji (1134) was given as an example. As it has a Chinese translation in parallel, it has been regarded as the first key to the decipherment of the Kitan Small Script. Based on such studies, we will have a chance to understand the Kitan language lying beyond the Kitan Scripts.
참고문헌 (58)
- 김위현, "國譯 遼史(上, 中, 下)" (2012), 단국대학교출판부
- 김주원, "한글과 거란소자에 대한 단상", 건지인문학, 8, pp.91~123 (2012), 전북대학교 인문학연구소
- 남권희, "요나라의 출판문화. 契丹文字 연구현황과 방안 모색", 단국대학교 부설 북방문화연구소 제13회 국제학술대회 발표논문집, pp.31~83 (2013), 단국대학교 부설 북방문화연구소
- 송기중, "한자주변의 문자들", 정신문화연구, 34, pp.21~47 (1988), 한국정신문화연구원
- 이성규, "요사(遼史) 국어해(國語解)의 거란어 연구", 몽골학, (32), pp.163~186 (2012), 한국몽골학회
- 이성규, "요사 국어해의 거란 관직명과 거란소자(契丹小字) 표기 관직명(官職名)의 비교연구", 단군학연구, 29(29), pp.423~446 (2013), 단군학회
- 이성규, "거란문자의 자료와 연구현황", 몽골학, (40), pp.1~28 (2015), 한국몽골학회
- 정재영, "韓國의 口訣", 구결연구, (17), pp.129~189 (2006), 구결학회
- 契丹文字硏究小組, "關於契丹小字硏究", 內蒙古大學學報, pp.1~97 (1977), 內蒙古大學
- 吉如何, "契丹大小字同形字比較硏究", 북방문화연구, 4, pp.29~43 (2013), 단국대학교 북방문화연구소
- 吉如何, "契丹小字原字字形規範與原字總表", 內蒙古大學學報, pp.127~132 (2009), 內蒙古大學
- 金光平, "錦西西孤山契丹文墓誌試釋", 考古學報, pp.69~84 (1957), 中國社會科學院考古研究所
- 金毓黻, "遼陵石刻集錄" (1934), 國立奉天圖書館
- 羅福成., "遼宣懿皇後哀冊釋文", 滿洲學報, pp.1~7 (1933), 滿洲學會
- 孫伯君, "契丹語研究" (2008), 中國社會科學出版社
- 松川 節, "契丹文字はどこにある? 契丹大字碑文の新發見", FIELD+, 8, pp.4~5 (2012), 東京外國語大學 AA硏究所
- 辛兌鉉, "契丹文哀冊に就いて", 青丘學叢, 28, pp.1~17 (1937), 青丘學會
- 契丹語言文字研究, "愛新覺羅", 京都大學東亞歴史文化研究會, ~ (2004)
- 愛新覺羅, "거란문자로 기록된 주요 자료. 서울대학교 중앙유라시아연구소 2010년 문명아카이브 해제 프로젝트", 1~25 (2010)
- 愛新覺羅, "韓半島から眺めた契丹ㆍ女眞" (2011), 京都大學學術出版會
- 愛新覺羅, "Current Trends in Altaic Linguistics: A Festschrift for Professor Emeritus Seong Baeg-in on his 80th Birthday", pp.339~404 (2013), Altaic Society of Korea
- 閻萬章, "錦西西孤山出土契丹文墓誌硏究", 考古學報, pp.69~84 (1957), 中國社會科學院考古研究所
- 吳英喆, "契丹語靜詞語法範疇硏究", 博士, pp.2005
- 吳英喆, "契丹語靜詞語法範疇硏究" (2007), 內蒙古大學出版社
- 契丹小字新發見資料釋讀問題, "吳英喆", 東京外國語大學 AA硏究所, ~ (2012)
- 吴英喆, "关于契丹小字的新资料《萧敌鲁墓志铭》和《耶律详稳墓志》", 알타이학보, (22), pp.111~119 (2012), 한국알타이학회[DOI]
- 吳英喆, "契丹文字資料の発見と「贋物」─契丹研究者の悩み", FIELD+, 8, pp.10~ (2012), 東京外國語大學 AA硏究所
- と10~12世紀東部ユーアジア, "アジア遊學", 2013, 166~178, pp.勉誠出版
- 吳英喆, "Current Trends in Altaic Linguistics: A Festschrift for Professor Emeritus Seong Baeg-in on his 80th Birthday", pp.409~419 (2013), Altaic Society of Korea
- 吳英喆., "契丹語靜辭領屬語法範疇硏究", 北方文化硏究, 4, pp.13~19 (2013), 단국대학교 북방문화연구소
- 吳英喆., "再論契丹文天幹陰陽之別", 北方文化硏究, 5, pp.57~63 (2014), 단국대학교 북방문화연구소
- 吴英喆, "关于若干契丹原字的读音", 알타이학보, (24), pp.129~134 (2014), 한국알타이학회
- 羽田亨, "契丹文字の新資料", 史林, 10(1), pp.82~96 (1925), 東洋史研究会
- 劉鳳翥., "<蕭旼墓誌銘>爲贋品設", 赤峰學院學報, 36(1), pp.6~11 (2015), 赤峰學院學報編輯部
- 劉鳳翥., "契丹文字研究類編 (全4冊)", pp.274~278 (2015), 中華書局
- 劉鳳翥, "遼上京地區出土的遼代碑刻彙輯" (2009), 社會科學文獻出版社
- 即實, "<糾鄰墓誌>校抄本及其他", 內蒙古大學學報, pp.79~106 (1991), 內蒙古大學
- 即實, "謎林問徑 — 契丹小字解讀新程" (1996), 遼寧民族出版社
- 即實, "謎田耕耘 — 契丹小字解讀續" (2012), 遼寧民族出版社
- 陳乃雄, "陳乃雄論文集" (1996), 內蒙古敎育出版社
- 陳曉偉, "再論契丹“五色紀年說” – 以契丹小字爲中心", 文史 (2011), 中華書局
- 清格爾泰, "契丹小字中的動詞附加成分", 民族語文, pp.1~9 (1992), 中國社會科學院
- 清格爾泰, "契丹小字釋讀問題" (2002), 不二出版株式會社
- 清格爾泰, "清格爾泰文集 五" (2010), 內蒙古科學技術出版社
- 清格爾泰, "契丹小字研究" (1985), 中國社會科學出版社
- 清格爾泰, "契丹小字硏究方法簡論", pp.1~39 (1979), 內蒙古大學蒙古語文硏究室
- と10~12世紀東部ユーアジア, "アジア遊學", 2013, 179~187, pp.勉誠出版
- Abel-Rémusat, J. P., "학술원논문집", pp.39~ (2000)
- Crossley, Pamela., "The Manchus" (1997), Blackwell Publishers
- Janhunen, Juha., "Khitan: Understanding the language behind the scripts", Scripta, 4, pp.107~132 (2012), The Hunminjeongeum Society
- Kane, Daniel, "The Kitan language and script (Handbook of Oriental Studies VIII, 19.)" (2009), Leiden & Boston
- Lehmann, Winfred, "Historical Linguistics: An Introduction" (1992), Routledge
- "Sovetskaia etnografia", 1963, 399~413, pp.Institute of Ethnography of the Academy of Sciences of the USSR
- Wu Yingzhe, "New Materials on the Khitan Small Script, A Critical edition of Xiao Dilu and Yelü Xiangwen" (2010), Global Oriental
- Wylie, Alexander, "On an Ancient Inscription in the Neu-chih Language", The Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society of Great Britain and Ireland, 17, pp.331~345 (1860), Royal Asiatic Society of Great Britain and Ireland
- Zaytsev, Viacheslav P., "ロシア科學アカデミー東洋文獻研究所所蔵契丹大字寫本(荒川慎太郎(訳))", 內陸アジア言語の研究, 27, pp.123~159 (2012)
- "Письменные памятники Востока", 2011, 130~150
- "Acta linguistica Petropolitana: Transaction of the Institute for Linguistic Studies", 2015, 167~208
