건축물 디자인 평가를 위한 평가체계 및 평가항목개발에 관한 연구 - 중소형 건축물을 중심으로 -
A study on the Development of Assessment Category and Items for Building Design Evaluation - Focused on the Small and Medium Building -
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The purpose of this study is to develop an evaluation category and items for architectural design assessment in attempt to improve design of small scale buildings within Se-Jong City. Some of the domains in existing design assessment are building design, function, environment, and technology. The category and items developed in this study however, is composed to aim for the building’s qualitative design assessment. Therefore the architectural assessment tool in this study includes design assessment of the building. Also, assessment category was comprised to verify the design expression used in improving the function and environmental condition of the building. The study was enforced by extracting raw data from existing architectural design related cases. Classification system and assessment category was developed and presented through combination of expert advice, survey, and sample test. In result of this study, the composition system required for design assessment can be divided into five large classifications ; public and harmony, access, form, environmental design, and space. Total of 24 assessment categories are developed and presented. The assessment category and standard presented in this study reflects the distinct regional characteristics and originality of Se-Jong city, creating one of a kind design assessment tool.
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to develop an evaluation category and items for architectural design assessment in attempt to improve design of small scale buildings within Se-Jong City. Some of the domains in existing design assessment are building design, function, environment, and technology. The category and items developed in this study however, is composed to aim for the building’s qualitative design assessment. Therefore the architectural assessment tool in this study includes design assessment of the building. Also, assessment category was comprised to verify the design expression used in improving the function and environmental condition of the building. The study was enforced by extracting raw data from existing architectural design related cases. Classification system and assessment category was developed and presented through combination of expert advice, survey, and sample test. In result of this study, the composition system required for design assessment can be divided into five large classifications ; public and harmony, access, form, environmental design, and space. Total of 24 assessment categories are developed and presented. The assessment category and standard presented in this study reflects the distinct regional characteristics and originality of Se-Jong city, creating one of a kind design assessment tool.
참고문헌 (10)
- 이광로, "건축계획" (1994), 문운당
- 박한규, "건축설계방법론" (2001), 기문당
- 류임우, "建物 디자인 槪念 導出因子의 選好에 관한 硏究", 대한건축학회논문집 계획계, 20(3), pp.7~14 (2004), 대한건축학회
- 류임우, "장소적 특성을 고려한 디자인 개념의 중요도 분석", 한국주거학회논문집, 17(1) (2006), 한국주거학회
- 강미선, "오피스건물 성능평가지표 개발 및 그 인증 방안에 관한 연구", 대한건축학회논문집 계획계, 19(3), pp.39~48 (2003), 대한건축학회
- 정동환, "건축물의 리모델링 가치분석을 위한 평가방법", 한국건축시공학회 논문집, 2(4) (2002)
- 이도영, "건축물의 미(美)적 판단기준으로서 시각정보 분석에 관한 연구: 거주전용 주택경관을 중심으로 한 사례연구", 대한건축학회논문집 계획계, 18(4), pp.89~98 (2002), 대한건축학회
- 조자연, "독일 병원건축 설계경기의심사평에 나타난 평가항목에 관한 연구", 한국의료복지시설학회지, 9(1), pp.53~60 (2003), 한국의료복지시설학회
- 류임우, "디자인 개념의 중요도를 고려한 설계과정", 대한건축학회논문집 계획계, 20(12), pp.3~12 (2004), 대한건축학회
- 유희준, "건축작품의 디자인 평가상의 평가스케일에 관한 연구", 대한건축학회지, 24(95) (1980)