2007년 상법총칙 상행위 판례회고
Review of the case law on the general provisions of the Commercial Law in 2007
0
조회
0
다운로드
8
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Abstract
<Abstract> Review of the case law on the general provisions of the Commercial Law in 2007 Ahn, Soo Hyun This year the Supreme Court of Korea made several important case laws affecting the commercial activities of a merchant. Firstly, there was a case which denied the application of Article 14 of the Commercial Code to an employee with a partial comprehensive rights of representation. Secondly, a case denied the application of the transfer of business regulation to a transaction of corporate restructuring or a transfer of trust business. Thirdly, the court also determined that the commercial extinctive prescription of 5 years should be applied to a claim for restitution of unjust enrichment based on a guarantee insurance contract. This approach, although it is seemed to change the court's previous position, is not basically different from the general view of the academic commentators and court's position. Fourthly, the court confirmed its traditional conclusion that an attorney is not a fictitious merchant which is subject to the Commercial Code. Finally, the court also decided that a claim of the agreed interest based on a loan between merchants also included a claim of the legal interest. This Article reviews the facts and decisions of these cases in detail and examines their legal implications in general.
참고문헌 (6)
- "상법총칙상행위법강론" (2002), 법문사
- 이철송, "상법총칙상행위" (2007), 박영사
- "상법강의(상)" (2007), 박영사
- 최기원, "상법학신론(상) 사례해설부" (2006), 박영사
- 신현윤, "2006년 상법판례의 회고와 전망-부분적 포괄대리권을 가진 상업사용인(제15조)를 중심으로-", 20집 (2007), 상사판례학회
- "부분적 포괄대리권을 가진 사용인에 상법 제14조가 유추적용되는지 여부" (2007)
